Originally posted by wichshock65
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2020-21 Bracketology
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by WuDrWu View PostHas there been a discussion of the NCAA's contingency plan?
2020-21D1MBB_TournamentReplacementPolicy.pdf (ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com)
I think the entire thing is incredibly relevant to both WSU and the ACC, as well as a couple of items I don't fully understand.
Am I reading this correctly? Once a bracket has been released, if a one bid team can't go, the conference can name a replacement, assuming they've been properly submitted, AND can provide 7 consecutive days of negative testing. I can all but promise you one bid leagues aren't going to have a team prepared for that contingency. WAY TOO expensive.
Also, I can't find where they say they'll find a replacement if a fill in team CAN'T provide that......and I assume because it will add to the at large.
If 1-6 bottom feeders get tossed for lack of protocol, and replaced by P5 at large, I won't be surprised.
Thoughts? Have I missed something?
Crazier protocol is that the first four out become "replacement teams" ... Those replacement teams will fill in directly at the same seed of the team that tested positive and had to be replaced. This is exactly how Duke is going to end up with a Top 4 seed this year
Comment
-
I'm starting to think that Aresco isn't scheduling WSU for any makeup games because he thinks the Shox are in. A loss against Memphis or SMU might be an elimination game. Not playing them eliminates that possibility. I think Waterman made a comment supporting that theory.
The downside is the long layoff. I've watched a couple of teams coming off of long layoffs and they've been rusty.The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Thinking the same thing (not rescheduling). The dots seem to line up for that line of thinking from Aresco. Shocks need to stay focused and win at Tulane and Temple!!!
Go Shocks!!!FINAL FOURS:
1965, 2013
NCAA Tournament:
1964, 1965, 1976, 1981, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2006, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021
NIT Champs - 1 (2011)
AP Poll History of Wichita St:
Number of Times Ranked: 157
Number of Times Ranked #1: 1
Number of Times Top 5: 32 (Most Recent - 2017)
Number of Times Top 10: 73 (Most Recent - 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017)
Highest Recent AP Ranking:
#3 - Dec. 2017
#2 ~ March 2014
Highest Recent Coaches Poll Ranking:
#2 ~ March 2014
Finished 2013 Season #4
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post
We are likely the "auto bid" but we are high enough we would be an at large even if we werent the autobid
It will be interesting to see if Jerry Palm stays consistent.
Comment
-
Blind resume time. 3 current bubble teams that are IN (as of now) plus WSU.
Screen Shot 2021-03-01 at 9.53.53 AM.png
- Likes 4
Comment
-
We’re team 2. Metrics still hate us. Team 4 is Drake. Gaudy records and metrics shouldn’t be rewarded when you played absolutely no one and didn’t try to play anybody either. I dunno who tf team 3 is but they shouldn’t be sniffing the dance. Let me guess. Some P5 middling crap turd?Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
- a smart man
Comment
-
For those Curious, if the team sheets are the same as last year, here is where we stand on the metrics that are actually listed on the team sheets. Our results based metrics say we are solidly in. Our predictive metrics say NIT.
NET: 66
KPI: 37
SOR: 35
BPI: 99
KP: 74
SAG: 66
filedata/fetch?id=1283492&d=1614618670&type=thumbYou do not have permission to view this gallery.
This gallery has 1 photos.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1972Shocker View PostTeam 1 - Colorado State
Team 2 - Wichita State
Team 3 - VCU
Team 4 - Drake.
I think.
Comment
Comment