Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

American Athletic Conference

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by jdmee View Post
    Per WSU's 2016 Financial Statement

    WSU's total revenue was $28,451,036
    WSU's expenses were $25,478,440

    Net positive of $2,972,596

    WSU's NCAA distribution was $1,086,082
    WSU's Conference distribution was $82,985
    Total distributions were $1,169,067

    or about 4.1% of total revenues.

    WSU without any distributions would still be in the black last year by $1,803,529

    Get out this year please.
    Keep the change, Elgin.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by 1972Shocker View Post
      That WSU would never leave or that they would never give a greater share of NCAA money to the teams that earned them? Or both?
      He said he thought WSU was in the right conference and hoped WSU would see it that way also - but said Bardo has been transparent in that WSU is going to evaluate it's options. He said he thinks WSU has decided that bringing back football is not a good option.

      On the question of shares - it was "never" would they consider adjusting the share formula. He sad WSU got more benefits by being in the MVC than the MVC gets benefit from WSU being in the conference and so the present share formula they believe is fair. It also sounded like CU had before they left the conference had submitted a proposal to adjust the formula and they had rejected it.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by SB Shock View Post
        On the question of shares - it was "never" would they consider adjusting the share formula. He sad WSU got more benefits by being in the MVC than the MVC gets benefit from WSU being in the conference and so the present share formula they believe is fair. It also sounded like CU had before they left the conference had submitted a proposal to adjust the formula and they had rejected it.
        There is no way he believes this.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by SB Shock View Post
          He said WSU got more benefits by being in the MVC than the MVC gets benefit from WSU being in the conference and so the present share formula they believe is fair.
          I think this pretty much sums up Elgin at this point. Completely out of touch with reality.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by SB Shock View Post
            He said WSU got more benefits by being in the MVC than the MVC gets benefit from WSU being in the conference and so the present share formula they believe is fair.
            Wow, that is some kind of delusional thinking right there.
            Its a good landing if you can walk away, its a great landing if the plane can be reused the next day.

            Comment


            • Without going back to see how much each tournament share was worth through the years, using this years # of approximately 1 share = $1.59mil over 6 years; WSU is worth an average of $742,000/yr in NCAA shares over the last 5 years. Any concern of WSU being another 'mouth to feed' in a conference, probably should quit worrying. They will bring their fair share to the table.

              WSU has earned a total of 14 shares 2012-2016, or 2.8 shares per season.
              -Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind-

              GO SHOX!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by SB Shock View Post
                On the question of shares - it was "never" would they consider adjusting the share formula. He sad WSU got more benefits by being in the MVC than the MVC gets benefit from WSU being in the conference and so the present share formula they believe is fair. It also sounded like CU had before they left the conference had submitted a proposal to adjust the formula and they had rejected it.
                This alone should make WSU want to expedite the process to GTFOASAP
                The Assman

                Comment


                • He must talk to Mark Adams too much

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post
                    He must talk to Mark Adams too much
                    Is getting rid of Mark part of the AAC package?

                    I love that Mark has a passion for the Shockers and for the "little guy" (doesn't apply to WSU), but having him commentate EVERY GAME gets tired. Plus, his consent hyperbole gets rather annoying.
                    The Assman

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by SHURTZtheHERTZ View Post
                      Is getting rid of Mark part of the AAC package?

                      I love that Mark has a passion for the Shockers and for the "little guy" (doesn't apply to WSU), but having him commentate EVERY GAME gets tired. Plus, his consent hyperbole gets rather annoying.
                      I like Mark, but he loses his credibility when he goes overboard. Like saying Jeremy Morgan is a Top 10 college player and comparing him to Lonzo Ball and such.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by AndShock View Post
                        There is no way he believes this.
                        It was very clear he does and by his tone he is pissed that WSU doesn't also see it his way.
                        It clear many in the MVC envy WSU basketball program but at the same time think WSU is arrogant and believe we will be back into the abyss sooner rather than later.

                        Comment


                        • I think I posted it somewhere else, but Adams compared Aundre Jackson of Loyola to Adrian Dantley, who played 15 seasons in the NBA and is in the Basketball Hall of Fame. Yeah, he lacks perspective on these matters.
                          "In God we trust, all others must bring data." - W. Edwards Deming

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post
                            I like Mark, but he loses his credibility when he goes overboard. Like saying Jeremy Morgan is a Top 10 college player and comparing him to Lonzo Ball and such.
                            That one example that stuck out in my head as well. Come on Mark, stay in your lane.
                            The Assman

                            Comment


                            • Linked Forbes article on the Shockers' Final Four run explains the potential financial synergy available to the AAC if they expand by adding the Shockers, VCU and Dayton. IMO an expanded AAC would be among the top 3 conferences regards annual invitees to the NCAA Tournament. If the expanded AAC averaged 6 invitees and each of them lost their first game the unit value to the AAC would be $1.5 million this year and $8 million over the next 5 years.

                              Imagine the revenue the expanded AAC would receive by adding the Shockers and the Shockers then replicating their last 6 year performance in the NCAA tourney.

                              https://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2014/03/20/how-a-single-ncaa-tournament-win-is-worth-1-6-million/#357e54b432b0

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by SB Shock View Post
                                It was very clear he does and by his tone he is pissed that WSU doesn't also see it his way.
                                It clear many in the MVC envy WSU basketball program but at the same time think WSU is arrogant and believe we will be back into the abyss sooner rather than later.
                                It's that britches thing.
                                The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
                                We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X