Jesus. I have/had the top 2 WR. Both turned up lame. My D/ST turned in 32 pts, RBs turned in 26, TE scored 0. I started Alex Smith over the QB I drafted. This is awful.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fantasy football anyone?
Collapse
X
-
2 glorious yards, I won by two glorious yards! Sorry about that @ShockdaWorld: - I thought you had me, but all your TDs got thieved last night.
Comment
-
Playoffs Question:
When I set up the league, I pretty much kept the settings as the normal standard settings. I happened to look at the playoff setup and saw that it is set so that the Top 4 teams make it with each playoff round covering two weeks. I am not sure how I feel about that and wondered what you all thought. Do you all like that...and if not, what would you think of these options:
-4 teams, one week per round
-6 teams, 1 and 2 get first-round byes, one week per round
-8 teams, one week per round
-4 teams, two weeks per round (stick with the current setup)
My personal thought might be the 6-team setup. It would keep people more interested over the course of the season and keep someone in 7th/8th place from mailing it in over the last month. Yet, it also requires you to still have a pretty good season to make the playoffs. This isn't the Missouri Valley Conference here where a bad team can get hot in the three weeks of playoff time to win the title.
Your thoughts?78-65
Comment
-
I'm torn. I like the 6 team idea, but I also like the two weeks per round for the playoffs idea. I hate that you may have the best team all season and roll into the last couple weeks when say, somebody rests your number one qb to save him for the playoffs and your backup guy gets pummelled. Of course, the way this season's going so far, I'll be lucky to make it into the Thursday night bracket."You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuShock16 View PostPlayoffs Question:
When I set up the league, I pretty much kept the settings as the normal standard settings. I happened to look at the playoff setup and saw that it is set so that the Top 4 teams make it with each playoff round covering two weeks. I am not sure how I feel about that and wondered what you all thought. Do you all like that...and if not, what would you think of these options:
-4 teams, one week per round
-6 teams, 1 and 2 get first-round byes, one week per round
-8 teams, one week per round
-4 teams, two weeks per round (stick with the current setup)
My personal thought might be the 6-team setup. It would keep people more interested over the course of the season and keep someone in 7th/8th place from mailing it in over the last month. Yet, it also requires you to still have a pretty good season to make the playoffs. This isn't the Missouri Valley Conference here where a bad team can get hot in the three weeks of playoff time to win the title.
Your thoughts?
Also, on another note, Greg Olsen is my man. He's one of my favorite picks. I'm not so sure about Stefon Diggs. Had to decline. Sorry about that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave Stalwart View PostAlso, on another note, Greg Olsen is my man. He's one of my favorite picks. I'm not so sure about Stefon Diggs. Had to decline. Sorry about that.78-65
Comment
-
Just posted a note on the league board...
I have entered our league into a contest. It is quite simple. We are not allowed to have anyone start a player who is on bye week. So...you cannot quit.
What's the benefit? Well, a league that qualifies by not having a bye-week starter will win a trip to hold next year's draft at the ESPN Headquarters. Each person would receive $1,000 PLUS airfare and hotel for the trip. Now, I don't know the chances of actually winning this, but I would be willing to take 5 minutes each week to make sure my lineup is good to find out.
So...can we all make that agreement to keep our lineups up-to-date?
78-65
Comment
-
This is my worst nightmarePeople who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -Isaac Asimov
Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded
Who else posts fake **** all day in order to maintain the acrimony? Wingnuts, that's who.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuShock16 View PostOy vey. Having the lowest-scoring team and having the highest-scoring set of opponents is usually not a good combination. Hang in there.People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -Isaac Asimov
Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded
Who else posts fake **** all day in order to maintain the acrimony? Wingnuts, that's who.
Comment
-
Standings
Sorry I've been slacking...here's some updated standings. Illinois State Still Sucks, and so does my team.Attached Files
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuShock16 View PostJust posted a note on the league board...
I have entered our league into a contest. It is quite simple. We are not allowed to have anyone start a player who is on bye week. So...you cannot quit.
What's the benefit? Well, a league that qualifies by not having a bye-week starter will win a trip to hold next year's draft at the ESPN Headquarters. Each person would receive $1,000 PLUS airfare and hotel for the trip. Now, I don't know the chances of actually winning this, but I would be willing to take 5 minutes each week to make sure my lineup is good to find out.
So...can we all make that agreement to keep our lineups up-to-date?
http://www.espn.com/fantasy/football...ntasy-football"You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."
Comment
Comment