Originally posted by wufan
View Post
So if you believe that decisions should be left to local officials one time (when you don't like the president, for example) and then believe at a later time that you don't think local officials make good decisions, absent a religious conversion, I would guess you are practicing situational ethics.
I trust my local elected (and unindicted) officials over him. According to what I've read,
1) This disease is more contagious than the measels
2) People can spread the disease without showing any symptoms.
So how does opening social businesses, allowing people to congregate and making masks optional control the spread of this? It doesn't.
Note I would not have a problem with this if we can at least come up with some treatments to drop the mortality rate down to an acceptable level (3% or less for me). We are not there yet.
I'm viewing this more as a publicity stunt to cater to the political extreme, as it serves no useful purpose EXCEPT to cater to a potential constituency when he stands for reelection.
Comment