Originally posted by wufan
View Post
The good thing is that he only made his own family sick. So that makes this a hypothetical, but still worthy of discussion.
We are just not going to agree on this. Reckless behavior is reckless behavior, period. And if you know the risks and impacts on innocent people when you engage in reckless behavior, you ought to be held accountable.
Not only that, this guy probably does not have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of, or has few assets and is 'probably' making themselves judgement-proof. Interesting story, I had exactly one date with a graduate of UT, business major. She did not believe in automobile insurance, refused to drive with it, resorted to all kinds of legal gymnastics to make herself judgment-proof, including transferring her homestead and whatever savings she had to the control of her minor child. I thought she was half a bubble off plumb, but there's a perfect example of what I am describing.
So if you can't punish him criinally and you can't punish him civilly, how do you hold him accountable?
Comment