Originally posted by revenge_of_shocka_khan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Coronavirus 2019-nCoV
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Windiwu View PostDo all these people who refuse to wear masks also refuse to buy car insurance or wear seat belts... Obviously those are also government instances of interferring in your freedom to do as you wish. Do you also demand the freedom to drive drunk?Livin the dream
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Windiwu View PostDo all these people who refuse to wear masks also refuse to buy car insurance or wear seat belts... Obviously those are also government instances of interferring in your freedom to do as you wish. Do you also demand the freedom to drive drunk?
Comment
-
On mask wearing, I’ve seen some very disingenuous statements in the public, and feel that some of them are being conflated with general public “maskers” and “anti-maskers”. Below are my disagreements.
Anti-maskers: You have no right to tell me what to do.
In areas of public health, we have ceded that gov regs are permissible for the public safety. Seat belts and no smoking are two obvious things.
Maskers: If you are refusing to wear a mask Then you are selfish.
There are many ways to protect the public. Poor quality, poorly fitted masks is pretty low. Did you ever wear a mask for flu season?
Anti-maskers: it’s difficult to breath
If you don’t require oxygen it shouldn’t be for low stress activities.
maskers: it’s not difficult to breathe.
Try exerting yourself in a mask. You wear out quickly.
Anti-maskers: masks don’t work.
N95 masks work pretty well. Well fitted, high quality surgical masks work if you don’t touch your face ever and never drink or eat in public.
Maskers: masks save lives
The standard fair of cloth crap people put on their face are garbage. They constantly touch their face, pull it down so they can enunciate, and remove it to eat or drink.Livin the dream
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by wufan View PostOn mask wearing, I’ve seen some very disingenuous statements in the public, and feel that some of them are being conflated with general public “maskers” and “anti-maskers”. Below are my disagreements.
Anti-maskers: You have no right to tell me what to do.
In areas of public health, we have ceded that gov regs are permissible for the public safety. Seat belts and no smoking are two obvious things.
Maskers: If you are refusing to wear a mask Then you are selfish.
There are many ways to protect the public. Poor quality, poorly fitted masks is pretty low. Did you ever wear a mask for flu season?
Anti-maskers: it’s difficult to breath
If you don’t require oxygen it shouldn’t be for low stress activities.
maskers: it’s not difficult to breathe.
Try exerting yourself in a mask. You wear out quickly.
Anti-maskers: masks don’t work.
N95 masks work pretty well. Well fitted, high quality surgical masks work if you don’t touch your face ever and never drink or eat in public.
Maskers: masks save lives
The standard fair of cloth crap people put on their face are garbage. They constantly touch their face, pull it down so they can enunciate, and remove it to eat or drink.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wufan View Post
Has to give you a lot of confidence.
They are better than the kerchiefs I see people wearing. I don't think there's anything out there that can give you absolute protection. I'd rather wear something than nothing. And just to note, my girlfriend paid $10 for 4 in Houston - they look exactly like the ones I got over the weekend (for about a buck apiece- they say they are Bonmed). I know of people who can get masks from companies that sell dental supplies (or if you have one of those hospital supply catalogs you might be able to get the real deal from them). Lastly, if you want to pay about $5 per pop, you can even get the 3M N95's, which are probably as good as they get (provided they aren't knock-offs).
You can be a little more brave about this than I can, when you start having it circulate pretty freely in McPherson, I may ask you again if you feel the same way. When you get up to about a couple hundred active cases, let me know.
Speaking of that, her beautician now has Covid. She's out of the woods because she hadn't been there in two weeks, but I'm sure it caused drama (I'm not in Houston).
I'm a risk analyst. It's about managing risk. You wear a mask when you are out, in conjunction with other risk mitigation efforts (staying locked down, not getting out any more than you have to, shrinking your social circle), the best one being staying locked down. I don't think anyone is saying that social distancing isn't effective. You can debate masks with me, I will still wear mine.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by wufan View Post
I fit in to your group of high risk as noted above. Just FYI.
I wore a mask (the ones that are not effective) for several hours per day while I watched a loved one in their final days (not CV-19 related) and the experience was beyond painful. Literally I couldn't breathe. While it would be exceedingly difficult for me to work or do even the most basic of tasks while wearing a mask, I would take the same approach were I completely healthy. If you want to wear a mask, wear a mask. I have zero problem with that. I watch people all day long take the masks on and off, stand next to others (with or without masks), touch their faces constantly if not obsessively and touch others without washing or spraying down.
Whomever made the comment about being same as having the right to drive drunk.....that possibly wins the award for most moronic post of all time.
Maybe, MAYBE in a perfect world where everyone wore a mask all the time (including at home) and washed their hands after touching anything or anyone, stayed 6 feet away from everyone (including family they live with), never touched their face and had the ability to isolate in a safe room if they ever tested positive (assuming that free, immediate response self tests were constantly available to everyone everywhere for free) then just maybe the masks might be responsible for a slight reduction in transmission. As it is they give false hope, reduce social distancing (they absolutely do NOT reinforce it) and are scientifically proven not to be effective.
This is just another extension of the problem that's plaguing this country of late (last 20 years or so). We obsess on the most bizarre of circumstances and apply what we think is the fix to everyone. Same thing with the Floyd issue. One man dies, the whole system must be thrown out. One mistake, or one tragedy, and we start over. It's insanity, and it has to stop.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by Windiwu View PostDo all these people who refuse to wear masks also refuse to buy car insurance or wear seat belts... Obviously those are also government instances of interferring in your freedom to do as you wish. Do you also demand the freedom to drive drunk?
Comment
-
We went from 40 cases to 75 cases in the last two weeks. Three clusters contribute to half of that. One quarter is definitely community spread. The other 1/4 is presumed due to travel or large outdoor sporting events.Livin the dream
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by wufan View PostWe went from 40 cases to 75 cases in the last two weeks. Three clusters contribute to half of that. One quarter is definitely community spread. The other 1/4 is presumed due to travel or large outdoor sporting events.
Comment
-
Originally posted by revenge_of_shocka_khan View Post
Or attending mass protests, campaign rallies, in-person church services and so forth. Since there are NO large outdoor sporting events going on right now, let's just call this for what it is, because it is obvious it is not 'large sporting events', that seems to be a classification mechanism to allow for more efficient and accurate data analysis. I'm not arguing that it is correct, I am just saying the name is a little off.Livin the dream
Comment
-
The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment