If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I'd take Anthony Grant in the MVC in a heartbeat. He's a good coach who just had a rough time at UA. Those P5 jobs aren't what they're cracked up to be. If GF gets canned at Bradley, AG could work miracles there.
"It's amazing to watch Ron slide into that open area, Fred will find him and it's straight cash homie."--HCGM
Perfect example of a guy leaving a school for greener pastures, but forgot that maybe that greener pasture is greener because it's fertilized with a ton of **** (football money).
How does being a football school make it harder to succeed in basketball? There are many examples of good basketball programs being at football schools.
I guess you could say that fans don't care about basketball because they are so interested in football, but fans will come out basically anywhere if you give them a winner.
How does being a football school make it harder to succeed in basketball? There are many examples of good basketball programs being at football schools.
I guess you could say that fans don't care about basketball because they are so interested in football, but fans will come out basically anywhere if you give them a winner.
My post can appear like a blanket statement for all football schools if you read it that way, I'm speaking specifically to Grant's situation at Alabama. Going from VCU to Alabama in basketball.... tell me how my comment isn't accurate?
I went to Wikipedia and did some research. I think unless you're from Michigan, Ohio, Florida or California, it's going to be difficult, if not impossible, to sustain success at a high level in both football and basketball. Note that those states have a lot more population than Alabama.
For 'big football' schools:
Texas has three final fours.
Oklahoma has had four, but one came in 1939, a second one in the early '50's (when the NIT was the hottest ticket in town). They've never won a national championship.
Alabama has never been in a final four.
USC has been to 2 final fours.
Florida State has been to one final four.
Now for the big basketball schools (except for UCLA):
Indiana - 8
Kentucky - 16
Kansas - 14
North Carolina - 18
Duke - 15.
All the big basketball schools have never had consistent, winning success in football.
The fact of the matter is that the alums support a consistent, winning tradition in sports and the only schools successful in both football and basketball for sustained periods (and competed for national championships) were in states that have relatively large populations. Running a top-flight program in either football or basketball is an expensive proposition. Running a top-flight program in both is hugely expensive. Usually the successful program drains resources from the 'unsuccessful' program.
Alabama not being a state with a relatively large population would make me conclude that they could be good at either football or basketball and they made that choice a long time ago.
By the way, and noting we have an Arkansas fan posting here, Arkansas won their last football NC in 1977. They also won in 1964, their only 2.
They won one BBNC under Nolan Richardson (I forgot the year and Wikipedia didn't post it). They have 6 final four appearances.
They have had more success in BB than in FB, apparently.
@shocka khan: also something to think about would be to look at the numbers of championships since the Big East formed, and started the scramble for TV dollars. My guess would be that your traditional Football powers have even less shared success in both sports since then.
By the way, and noting we have an Arkansas fan posting here, Arkansas won their last football NC in 1977. They also won in 1964, their only 2.
They won one BBNC under Nolan Richardson (I forgot the year and Wikipedia didn't post it). They have 6 final four appearances.
They have had more success in BB than in FB, apparently.
You're giving us too much credit. Arkansas did not win a FB NC in 1977. Our only one is 1964. We won in basketball in 1994.
I went to Wikipedia and did some research. I think unless you're from Michigan, Ohio, Florida or California, it's going to be difficult, if not impossible, to sustain success at a high level in both football and basketball. Note that those states have a lot more population than Alabama.
For 'big football' schools:
Texas has three final fours.
Oklahoma has had four, but one came in 1939, a second one in the early '50's (when the NIT was the hottest ticket in town). They've never won a national championship.
Alabama has never been in a final four.
USC has been to 2 final fours.
Florida State has been to one final four.
Now for the big basketball schools (except for UCLA):
Indiana - 8
Kentucky - 16
Kansas - 14
North Carolina - 18
Duke - 15.
All the big basketball schools have never had consistent, winning success in football.
The fact of the matter is that the alums support a consistent, winning tradition in sports and the only schools successful in both football and basketball for sustained periods (and competed for national championships) were in states that have relatively large populations. Running a top-flight program in either football or basketball is an expensive proposition. Running a top-flight program in both is hugely expensive. Usually the successful program drains resources from the 'unsuccessful' program.
Alabama not being a state with a relatively large population would make me conclude that they could be good at either football or basketball and they made that choice a long time ago.
Florida has had success both in football and basketball. That was the only school I could think of with fairly recent success in both sports
Comment