Originally posted by ShockdaWorld
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WSU vs. Rambler Game Thread
Collapse
X
-
"I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
---------------------------------------
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
"We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".
A physician called into a radio show and said:
"That's the definition of a stool sample."
-
Originally posted by WheatShock View PostHis hand was on the defender and he may have used it a bit. It wasn't an obvious push off (if he did at all), and its a common move that is rarely called unless a player hooks the defender to hold him off. Like I said, very ticky tack.
Overall I thought Nurg played well last night, he defended, passed well, and got the rebounds he should get (including 1 bullcrap foul call late)."You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cdizzle View PostRashard Kelly is really helping us win right now. Best guy at pursuing the basketball we have right now. And his defense on Doyle there with a minute left was just perfect.
Frankamp had a great first half. Probably his best half since the Seton Hall game.
Reaves sure seems to have a Baker/Wessel-esque ability to end up around the ball.
I love the 1-1-3, and contrary to popular opinion on this thread it has helped us out tremendously during Marshall's tenure. But there's little doubt we stayed in it too long last night. On the other hand, it did stop the FT-parade that happened the last 8 minutes of the first half. And it helped hide Shaq's apparent lack of desire to play any defense at all last night.
Smith will need to be much, much better on Saturday. He has shown that he can be.
Nurger seems very adept at passing out of double teams for someone who just started drawing double teams.
That could have been a big shot not only for the Shockers season, but for Zach Brown's season as well.
Also agree about the zone. You HAVE to adjust quicker than that. When they were throwing everything in and our in the Top 5 at FG %, you can't let shooters shoot practice shots. Very frustrating that it took so long to realize that and it nearly cost us.
Oh and Nurger's foul, like many of the ones last night, was phantom GARBAGE.Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
- a smart man
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stickboy46 View PostIt was either a timeout or a foul on Loyola. They weren't even close to tieing it up. Austin had the ball with 100% possession and was a calling a timeout for about 3 seconds before the Loyola player reached in.
Comment
-
Custer and Richardson have played together for like 12 years. With a lot of success. Richardson would have loved to have been offered here.
The 2 have played something like 20+ games on Devlin Court. Those 2 are winners.
I get their non-con, it was soft but they played well and they do what average teams need to do to be not average. They play to their strengths.
Jackson shoots layups. Doyle drives. Custer and Richardson shoot 3s. Play to your strengths. Double the post. They do an excellent job at that.
Maybe they were just in a funk for 3 games vs Toledo, the Drake and ISU. I don't know, but the team I watched last night is going to win a bunch of their last 13 games.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockdaWorld View PostI think we may be talking about two different plays. The one I'm talking about, he was standing in front of the defender with his back to him.Its a good landing if you can walk away, its a great landing if the plane can be reused the next day.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockdaWorld View PostI think we may be talking about two different plays. The one I'm talking about, he was standing in front of the defender with his back to him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuDrWu View PostCuster and Richardson have played together for like 12 years. With a lot of success. Richardson would have loved to have been offered here.
The 2 have played something like 20+ games on Devlin Court. Those 2 are winners.
I get their non-con, it was soft but they played well and they do what average teams need to do to be not average. They play to their strengths.
Jackson shoots layups. Doyle drives. Custer and Richardson shoot 3s. Play to your strengths. Double the post. They do an excellent job at that.
Maybe they were just in a funk for 3 games vs Toledo, the Drake and ISU. I don't know, but the team I watched last night is going to win a bunch of their last 13 games.
I am starting to fall in love with this team. They play a lot of smart basketball. Not perfect, but a lot.
There was a possession, where Kelly impressed me with his ball skills. Ball skills that I did not think he had.
Relative to an earlier question and comment about Shaq's play, I think the answer is attitude, not injury.
Where would this team be without Darral and Rauno? Darral, the fierce. Rauno, the late bloomer.
Landry's injury last year just might be bitter sweet. He is playing with a lot of confidence and at a very high level.
I am not a big fan of Conner, but I thought he played well last night. I thought he showed more energy and aggression that he normally does.
Why was C.J. in street clothes last night?
d"Prediction is very difficult, especially if it is about the future."
--Niels Bohr
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ricardo del Rio View PostLandry's injury last year just might be bitter sweet. He is playing with a lot of confidence and at a very high level.
Originally posted by Ricardo del Rio View PostI am not big fan of Conner, but I thought he played well last night. I thought he showed more energy and aggression that he normally does.
Originally posted by Ricardo del Rio View PostWhy was C.J. in street clothes last night?
d
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockerFever View PostI also wanted to give props out to the several fans who left with 2 minutes left in a 6 point game. We've been getting drubbings all year at home. We finally have a close, exciting game and there's people heading to the exits during a game that started an hour earlier than normal. What am I missing? Can somebody explain to me what's the point of these people even attending WSU basketball games?
Gotta get home for that quickie before their nightie-night time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by proshox View PostLoyola is good, but WSU's zone defense made that a game. You can't give wide open looks to an efficient offense. HCGM kept changing personnel as if they were the problem instead of changing back to man to man....until it was almost too late.
We go back to man and the lead stretches. There is no mystery here.
Marshall wants his COY award back, apparently.
Comment
-
Comment