If KSU gets in it is bullshit. But I think they will go ahead and drop their last 2, so it will be moot anyway.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2016-17 Bracketology
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostFor those wondering...
On Selection Sunday last year the bracketmatrix had WSU in 137 of 144 brackets, with an average seed of 9.86. They were projected as the 5th-to-last team in. The 11 seed and a play-in game was a surprise, but not completely out of nowhere.
Today, the matrix just updated, and WSU is in 111 of 113 brackets, with an average seed of 9.42. They are projected as the 10th-to-last team in. WSU is not actually on the bubble, no matter what Jerry Palm says. Only a loss on Friday can change that.
That said, what's your reasoning that a Saturday loss would be no case for concern?Dominance is a state of mind.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jhook89 View PostThat was after our loss to ISUr in Arch Madness last year though. This whole scenario hinges on us losing in St. Louis. If we do lose that will completely change our numbers this year for the worse. At that point would be a fair time to compare the numbers.
For the record, I think we will win Arch Madness and not even have to worry about this.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dwbarcl View PostMixed emotions about this on BJ underground
Their entire self-worth as a program is tied to conference affiliation and the accomplishments of others. It's hilarious. Especially when you read about how they still have too many "MVC-level players."
News flash: Gregg Marshall won 9 NCAA games in 4 years with an entire roster of MVC-level players. Individual teams make quality, not conference affiliation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dwbarcl View PostMixed emotions about this on BJ underground
Illinois State v Virginia...literally tens of points scored. Take the under no matter what.Wichita State, home of the All-Americans.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cdizzle View PostEverything you need to know about BJ fans: "Even if we did lose, we're in the Big East and they're in the MVC"
Their entire self-worth as a program is tied to conference affiliation and the accomplishments of others. It's hilarious. Especially when you read about how they still have too many "MVC-level players."
News flash: Gregg Marshall won 9 NCAA games in 4 years with an entire roster of MVC-level players. Individual teams make quality, not conference affiliation.
Comment
-
Last year also had an X-Factor that couldn't be predetermined, so even a post loss comparison wouldn't necessarily be apples to apples. We simply couldn't know how the committee would treat the injuries, and we still don't know. Maybe they completely ignored them, and we really should have gotten a 10 seed if they were did their due diligence. Maybe they had us out and the injuries were the only reason we even got a play-in.
I do think that this year we should be safe though, though a Friday loss would create a lot of questions we really don't want answered. There are a lot of reasons for this, one big one being the eye test. Simply put, the low offense games last season made us look worse than the 100 point romps we've had recently.
But some of it has to do with the shallowness of the A10, the falloff of the MWC, and the rise of 6-12 power conference bubble team. It takes a special type of person to think a barely .500 team should be in the dance over us, and that is what it would take. And I'm not talking about .500 in conference.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CBB_Fan View PostLast year also had an X-Factor that couldn't be predetermined, so even a post loss comparison wouldn't necessarily be apples to apples. We simply couldn't know how the committee would treat the injuries, and we still don't know. Maybe they completely ignored them, and we really should have gotten a 10 seed if they were did their due diligence. Maybe they had us out and the injuries were the only reason we even got a play-in.
I do think that this year we should be safe though, though a Friday loss would create a lot of questions we really don't want answered. There are a lot of reasons for this, one big one being the eye test. Simply put, the low offense games last season made us look worse than the 100 point romps we've had recently.
But some of it has to do with the shallowness of the A10, the falloff of the MWC, and the rise of 6-12 power conference bubble team. It takes a special type of person to think a barely .500 team should be in the dance over us, and that is what it would take. And I'm not talking about .500 in conference.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockerFever View PostIn Jerry's world, a WSU WIN over OU is holding them back from getting in. Meanwhile a KSU LOSS by 30 points to OU is keeping them in.
I know that's a snapshot thing but I find it hilarious.
Comment
Comment