More from KC Star - Unfazed by shadow of younger brother, Nick Wiggins contributing to WSU's success
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wichita State media love thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by WuDrWu View PostSince we're being factual with facts lately, I'd like to point out that all 3 of Louisville's losses are not to teams "likely" to be in the NCAA tournament. While UK and Memphis are likely, UNC is not and is more likely out right now
You are nit picking. UNC was a sub point of a sub point in my argument about Louisville.
You are in the minority in your opinion about UNC. Lunardi has them as a 9 seed. Palm has them as a 10. Majority opinion among bracketologists is that they are in, and not even in the "last 4 in" grouping.
You are incorrect to say you are speaking about facts. You are entitled to your opinion that UNC is not very likely to make the tourney, but that is your opinion, not fact.
Other than that, right on!
Comment
-
http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/jeff-*******/post?id=2944&ex_cid=espnapi_public
I can't read it all unfortunately because I'm not an insider.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostYou are nit picking. UNC was a sub point of a sub point in my argument about Louisville.
You are in the minority in your opinion about UNC. Lunardi has them as a 9 seed. Palm has them as a 10. Majority opinion among bracketologists is that they are in, and not even in the "last 4 in" grouping.
You are incorrect to say you are speaking about facts. You are entitled to your opinion that UNC is not very likely to make the tourney, but that is your opinion, not fact.
Other than that, right on!
And I agree, it's pretty funny that to keep Louisville in the rankings that a single top 50 win classifies as real justification.
#winning
Edit: modified 100 to 50.You miss 100% of the shots you don't take....
.....but, statistically speaking, you miss 99% of the shots you do take.
Comment
-
The blurb referenced was one of the silly blurbs they do next to the top 25. Room for about one sentence, maybe two. Such small space for analysis it is almost worthless.
That said, wouldn't "they lost a game this week but also got a decent win" work as a valid, concise argument against the "they just lost a game, what have they done to merit not falling further than you dropped them" crowd?
Winning a single top 50 game wasn't being used for justification of a #1 ranking. It was being used for justification of keeping them in the poll at all. Big difference. Scenario 1 would be silly. Scenario 2 makes sense to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostThe blurb referenced was one of the silly blurbs they do next to the top 25. Room for about one sentence, maybe two. Such small space for analysis it is almost worthless.
That said, wouldn't "they lost a game this week but also got a decent win" work as a valid, concise argument against the "they just lost a game, what have they done to merit not falling further than you dropped them" crowd?
Winning a single top 50 game wasn't being used for justification of a #1 ranking. It was being used for justification of keeping them in the poll at all. Big difference. Scenario 1 would be silly. Scenario 2 makes sense to me.
#winningYou miss 100% of the shots you don't take....
.....but, statistically speaking, you miss 99% of the shots you do take.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ICTShockerFan View Posthttp://insider.espn.go.com/blog/jeff-*******/post?id=2944&ex_cid=espnapi_public
I can't read it all unfortunately because I'm not an insider.
all snark aside, this is one of the more accurate assessments of the team from outside our fanbase that i've seen. when jeff ******* is impressed enough to actually pay attention to your squad long enough to write an article, you've reached elite status
take care of business saturday!Dominance is a state of mind.
Comment
-
One quick note before we present the rankings: With Wichita State’s move to the American Athletic Conference, the Shockers have moved out of the mid-major club. We wish the Shockers well against Cincinnati, UConn, SMU, and more.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ICTShockerFan View Posthttp://insider.espn.go.com/blog/jeff-*******/post?id=2944&ex_cid=espnapi_public
I can't read it all unfortunately because I'm not an insider.
WSU is great...it all starts with the Marshall Mentality - grit and toughness. "But Wichita has been tough throughout his tenure. That's not what separates this group from last year. Here are the key differences:"
1. Talent
2. Fred VanVleet
3. Ron Baker
4. Improved offense
5. Low-maintenance and leadership
6. Tekele Cotton
7. Big man by committee
with a paragraph+ about each of those 7 things.
"But there's honestly not much to worry about if you're Gregg Marshall," he ["one coach" referred to earlier in the article] added. "This team is loaded. They are capable of beating anyone in the entire country."Last edited by chicagoshocker; January 17, 2014, 12:41 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shoxfan11 View PostThis doesn't really count as "media", but, former Steelers' kicker Jeff Reed:
Jeff Reed @TheRealJeffReed 6h
Before i forget to give out props, congrats to the Wichita State hoops team...18-0 start...in case u were wondering, my pops played there!!!
From Wikipedia:
"Reed's father, Morris, played basketball for Wichita State and his mother, Pam, was a cheerleader for Wichita State."
Comment
-
60% increase in enrollment applications at WSU:
http://www.kwch.com/news/local-news/...t/-/index.htmlShockerNet is a rat infested cess pool.
Comment
Comment