This thread perfectly shows the insanity of some message board posts.
Generally speaking, an improvement in seeding makes for an easier road to the Final 4.
No caveats or additions to that statement are needed. To argue against it is LITERALLY insane. :-)
pie n eye, by your own rationale that 1 seeds advance because they are typically great basketball teams, you are cementing the idea that the committee generally puts the best teams in the best seeds and the worst teams in the worst seeds. Nobody here has claimed that a 1 seed is a sleepwalk to the sweet 16, but many have claimed the obvious, that a 1 seed makes for the EASIEST path to the sweet 16, final four, etc. I can't believe there is an argument here.
Generally speaking, an improvement in seeding makes for an easier road to the Final 4.
No caveats or additions to that statement are needed. To argue against it is LITERALLY insane. :-)
pie n eye, by your own rationale that 1 seeds advance because they are typically great basketball teams, you are cementing the idea that the committee generally puts the best teams in the best seeds and the worst teams in the worst seeds. Nobody here has claimed that a 1 seed is a sleepwalk to the sweet 16, but many have claimed the obvious, that a 1 seed makes for the EASIEST path to the sweet 16, final four, etc. I can't believe there is an argument here.
Comment