Originally posted by WuDrWu
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WSU VERSUS PITTSBURG PREDICTIONS AND PREGAME DISCUSSIONS
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by SubGod22 View PostI think the difference is that most of them are already talking about Gonzaga.
And I doubt the most popular thread on Shockernet would be "Wonder if Gonzaga is crapping their pants thinking about a matchup with us....".Last edited by WuDrWu; March 17, 2013, 08:31 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuDrWu View PostAnyone besides the 2 coaches and Demetric left over from the last time these 2 teams met in Kansas City?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Downtown Shocker Brown View PostMe.
12 Ashton Gibbs Senior 6-2 190
14 Nick Rivers Senior 6-0 180
35 Nasir Robinson Senior 6-5 225
11 Dante Taylor Junior 6-9 240
1 Tray Woodall Junior 5-11 190
Here is the box score
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=293270221
http://fightpittfight.com/pittsburgh...burgh-boxscore
Team Rosters 09-10 and current
"Valley-shaking, nation-waking 29-game win streak." - Paul Suellentrop, The Wichita Eagle
Comment
-
Gonzaga is prepping to have to play us. They should be. We are a team. Pitt is a good team with A great player. We have quite a few very good players.
I don't expect a walk-over... in the first half. But we will beat these fools down worse than we did Seton Hall in 2006.
Shockers 75 - 55 Pittsburg
The next round will be the war. Olynyk is a great player and legit 7 ft. If EO is going to be a defensive presence, this will be his chance. We need solid guard play, excellent rebounding, and the ability to protect the ball. This is the key to all teams in the tournament though. I like our chances.
Shockers 80 - 75 Gonzaga.
Comment
-
The TV people are wrong. Pitt can score with anybody. They usually don't score a lot because they play at a super slow pace. Those comments were just an overreaction to the Notre Dame game.
Pitt is an interesting matchup because one guy does not dominate for them. Their top three guys are Tray Woodall (23.5% of possessions), Talib Zanna (22.8% possessions) and Lamar Patterson (21.6% possessions). All three are very efficient players. Don't be surprised if Demetric guards Woodall and Cotton guards Patterson. Patterson is taller and bigger and he'd be a mismatch for anyone else.
Comment
-
Bracket Projection: Wichita State
Can Wichita State hit enough 3-pointers to pull off an upset?
Updated: March 17, 2013, 6:10 PM ET By Bill Doherty | ESPN Insider
Anyone else with insider feel free to make your breakdown of the article for those without
http://insider.espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/tournament/2013/story/_/page/lunardi13wichitastate/2013-ncaa-tournament-bracket-projections-wichita-state-shockers
"Valley-shaking, nation-waking 29-game win streak." - Paul Suellentrop, The Wichita Eagle
Comment
-
Originally posted by HarpBros View PostHere is the box score
http://espn.go.com/ncb/boxscore?gameId=293270221
Comment
-
Take it for what is it worth, but if the various statistical ranking systems are to be trusted, Pitt should have been much better than a 8 seed and this isn't nearly as good a draw as we could have gotten even if we were worse than a 9 seed (UCLA for instance). Their composite ranking is #13 in the nation to our #34. Granted, our injury issues affect our ranking, but if that #13 number is even remotely close to being accurate, Pitt is way underseeded.
Here are the teams they have lost to this year:
Michigan - 67-62
Cincinnati - 70-61
Rutgers - 67-62
Marquette (2x) - 74-67OT and 79-69
Louisville - 64-61
Notre Dame - 51-42
Syracuse - 62-59
Rutgers is the only mediocre team in that bunch. All the others are NCAA teams, and most are good seeds.
Here are their best wins:
Georgetown - 73-45
Villanova (2x) - 58-43 and 73-64OT
UCONN - 69-61
Syracuse - 65-55"Cotton scared me - I left him alone." - B4MSU (Bear Nation poster) in reference to heckling players
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Mad Hatter View PostTake it for what is it worth, but if the various statistical ranking systems are to be trusted, Pitt should have been much better than a 8 seed and this isn't nearly as good a draw as we could have gotten even if we were worse than a 9 seed (UCLA for instance). Their composite ranking is #13 in the nation to our #34. Granted, our injury issues affect our ranking, but if that #13 number is even remotely close to being accurate, Pitt is way underseeded.
Here are the teams they have lost to this year:
Michigan - 67-62
Cincinnati - 70-61
Rutgers - 67-62
Marquette (2x) - 74-67OT and 79-69
Louisville - 64-61
Notre Dame - 51-42
Syracuse - 62-59
Rutgers is the only mediocre team in that bunch. All the others are NCAA teams, and most are good seeds.
Here are their best wins:
Georgetown - 73-45
Villanova (2x) - 58-43 and 73-64OT
UCONN - 69-61
Syracuse - 65-55
Also, we had common opponents in DePaul and Detroit. They won all of their gams beating Detroit in Pittsburgh by 13 and solidly beating DePaul in two games by large (15-25 point) margins.Kansas is Flat. The Earth is Not!!
Comment
-
Comparative Stats from StatSheet.com - Pittsburgh - NCAA Tourney
"I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
---------------------------------------
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
"We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".
A physician called into a radio show and said:
"That's the definition of a stool sample."
Comment
Comment