Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NIL Collective

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post

    That's some irony right there
    Exactly! Really ironic!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post

      That's some irony right there
      Or go to the other side and steal their grass and bring to your house.

      Comment


      • Or piss on it and kill it

        Comment




        • Yup .. Definitely not pay for play

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post


            Yup .. Definitely not pay for play
            SMU did it before. Surprised it took them this long.

            People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -Isaac Asimov

            Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded
            Who else posts fake **** all day in order to maintain the acrimony? Wingnuts, that's who.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by shock View Post

              SMU did it before. Surprised it took them this long.
              lmao, right? Heck, they might even be realizing a discount at $36k compared to those shady deals of old!

              Comment


              • Since there is no note worthy announcements about our NIL/Armchair strategies collective I would assume the managers are playing it close to the vest or, it is abysmally poor

                Comment


                • Someone needs to take this to court already so we can understand the boundaries. Right now there is just a massive gray area on this. What SMU (well their collective), IS pay to play. I think that's pretty clear. But is that enforceable. Also the fact that its only the male athletes that benefit could put it up against Title IX. Just so many unanswered questions of what is and isn't allowed here.

                  If this is the way to go .. we need to figure out how to compete. If they are giving 36k to all of their players .. seems reasonable that WSU's collective could find a way to come up with enough for 40-50k for the MBB team as a baseline with some extra to try to grab some really high profile athletes. 40k per player would be 520k for the MBB scholarship roster. It's a lot of money but seems doable if we are saying MBB is our sport to support at WSU (yes that doesn't give anything to baseball or softball or any others).
                  Last edited by Stickboy46; August 8, 2022, 08:10 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post
                    Someone needs to take this to court already so we can understand the boundaries. Right now there is just a massive gray area on this. What SMU (well their collective), IS pay to play. I think that's pretty clear. But is that enforceable. Also the fact that its only the male athletes that benefit could put it up against Title IX. Just so many unanswered questions of what is and isn't allowed here.

                    If this is the way to go .. we need to figure out how to compete. If they are giving 36k to all of their players .. seems reasonable that WSU's collective could find a way to come up with enough for 40-50k for the MBB team as a baseline with some extra to try to grab some really high profile athletes. 40k per player would be 520k for the MBB scholarship roster. It's a lot of money but seems doable if we are saying MBB is our sport to support at WSU (yes that doesn't give anything to baseball or softball or any others).
                    We have a big advantage over SMU and we need to take advantage of it. It only takes us 520k to pay 40k while it takes them 3.5 million to pay 35k because they have football. We should be able to outbid every school in the American that has football.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Topshock View Post

                      We have a big advantage over SMU and we need to take advantage of it. It only takes us 520k to pay 40k while it takes them 3.5 million to pay 35k because they have football. We should be able to outbid every school in the American that has football.
                      The KU model

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Dan View Post

                        The KU model
                        36K is chump change for KU

                        Comment


                        • I think Dan is meaning that they pour all available resources into anything not named football.
                          People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -Isaac Asimov

                          Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded
                          Who else posts fake **** all day in order to maintain the acrimony? Wingnuts, that's who.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post
                            Someone needs to take this to court already so we can understand the boundaries. Right now there is just a massive gray area on this. What SMU (well their collective), IS pay to play. I think that's pretty clear. But is that enforceable. Also the fact that its only the male athletes that benefit could put it up against Title IX. Just so many unanswered questions of what is and isn't allowed here.

                            If this is the way to go .. we need to figure out how to compete. If they are giving 36k to all of their players .. seems reasonable that WSU's collective could find a way to come up with enough for 40-50k for the MBB team as a baseline with some extra to try to grab some really high profile athletes. 40k per player would be 520k for the MBB scholarship roster. It's a lot of money but seems doable if we are saying MBB is our sport to support at WSU (yes that doesn't give anything to baseball or softball or any others).
                            The NIL will have zero impact on Title IX because the schools aren't officially involved in allocation of funds.

                            And there are some female golfers and gymnasts and such that are also making bank off of NIL because they're smoking hot and there are businesses out there that see a lot of value in that.
                            Infinity Art Glass - Fantastic local artist and Shocker fan
                            RIP Guy Always A Shocker
                            Carpenter Place - A blessing to many young girls/women
                            ICT S.O.S - Great local cause fighting against human trafficking
                            Wartick Insurance Agency - Saved me money with more coverage.
                            Save Shocker Sports - A rallying cry

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by SubGod22 View Post

                              The NIL will have zero impact on Title IX because the schools aren't officially involved in allocation of funds.

                              And there are some female golfers and gymnasts and such that are also making bank off of NIL because they're smoking hot and there are businesses out there that see a lot of value in that.
                              "Officially" might be able to be challenged in court IMO. Any communication at all with the NIL collectives could be seen as involvement. You might be right .. just seems like a massive gray area here.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by SubGod22 View Post

                                The NIL will have zero impact on Title IX because the schools aren't officially involved in allocation of funds.

                                And there are some female golfers and gymnasts and such that are also making bank off of NIL because they're smoking hot and there are businesses out there that see a lot of value in that.
                                "You Just Want to Slap The #### Outta Some People"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X