Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OT...Getting Sick of this Spit

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Awesome Sauce Malone View Post
    Of course it was planned. Just like the incident last week and the one before that.
    Well, let me re-phrase. Our two choices seem to be "work related attack" and "terrorist attack".

    Work related is generally more spur of the moment. Yes, an individual may have been on a slow burn for awhile and thought/plotted, so it could be planned.

    A terrorist attack more well planned. In this case, family was given an excuse for watching the child, he attended the function, left, attack with his wife (that's generally not work related) when he knew they attendees would not be expecting. It also may lead all the way back to his trip to Saudi Arabia and his marriage. Hardly, a work related type of plan. Sorry I was not clear enough.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by ShockTalk View Post
      Well, let me re-phrase. Our two choices seem to be "work related attack" and "terrorist attack".

      Work related is generally more spur of the moment. Yes, an individual may have been on a slow burn for awhile and thought/plotted, so it could be planned.

      A terrorist attack more well planned. In this case, family was given an excuse for watching the child, he attended the function, left, attack with his wife (that's generally not work related) when he knew they attendees would not be expecting. It also may lead all the way back to his trip to Saudi Arabia and his marriage. Hardly, a work related type of plan. Sorry I was not clear enough.
      Look Im on the opposite side of pretty much everyone in this thread. i find it humorous that after the attack on planned parenthood last week in Colorado the first comment after it was mentioned was shaming someone because there were not enough facts.
      with that said I am not attacking your or disagreeing with you. But get kind of tired of people compartmentalize these acts. Generally with what I know of workplace violence it doesnt tend to be an immediate thing. it festers and boils and later on down the road it happens. It might not be as well thought out but still planned none the less. Walking into a building and shooting it up is not just a random act. Whether the guys name is John or Sayed.

      Either way this is absolutely horrifying and disgusting. I dont want anyone to die. But i also wonder why we are working on 3 pages on this while we just had something similar just this last week and not a peep from the folks here? Since I have said this im fully prepared to read "Well yeah it was a terror threat but" No buts!

      Comment


      • #48
        It would be difficult for me to believe that a young couple with a baby would both do this, with so much foresight and planning, and not be religiously motivated. I suppose they could be/were insane. If it were just the guy, I could buy planned workplace violence as an explanation. There are just too many signs pointing to this being an act of jihad.

        Comment


        • #49
          More Stupid comments

          Originally posted by ShockRef View Post
          Our illustrious leader blurted out again (before any facts known about today's tragedy) about legislating more gun control.
          Interesting that when all law enforcement rained down on the area, all of them were carrying... Guns!

          He is the most incompetent leader in the history of this country. He is truly embarrassing.

          Just a few of his recent dumbass quips...
          "They are the JV Squad"
          "ISIL is contained"
          The list goes on and on. He is good for one dumbass quote per day.

          Elections have consequences.

          That is all.
          And recent dumbass quips from republicans who all receive NRA money:
          "Let's pray for these poor people." - Lindsey Graham
          "Let's pray for these poor people." - Ted Cruz
          "My thoughts and prayers go out to these people." - Senator Ron Johnson
          "Our thoughts are with these families." - Senator Mitch McConnell (he got almost a million during his relection campaign from the NRA).

          Shock ref, do we elect these people to pray or do we elect these people to fix problems? Note if we elect them to pray, I want to nominate the Pope for president. I bet God hears his prayers much better than these guys.

          Read the truth and it will set you free:
          Prayers aren’t working. White House hopefuls on the Democratic side of the aisle called for stricter gun laws in the wake of the shooting in San Bernardino that left at least 14 dead. But aft…

          Comment


          • #50
            Article headline states, "GOP Offers Prayers not Solutions". What are the solutions?
            Livin the dream

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by wufan View Post
              Article headline states, "GOP Offers Prayers not Solutions". What are the solutions?
              who knows.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Awesome Sauce Malone View Post
                who knows.
                Apparently, Republicans are supposed to know.

                If they hadn't said anything at all, the article would be, "GOP silent, insensitive in wake of shooting".

                The media sucks and I'm sick of them.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by shocka khan View Post
                  One more thing we should not forget if San Bernardino turns out to be fundamentalist religious terrorism: Most of the 9/11 hijackers (I believe all but one) same from Saudi Arabia.

                  Al Quaida was provided material support and sympathy from Saudi Arabia.

                  ISIS was provided material support and sympathy from Saudi Arabia.

                  The muslim's wife who helped him with the attack yesterday was from Saudi Arabia.

                  Anyone see a pattern here?
                  They're all Muslims?

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by shocka khan View Post
                    We guard their oil fields and sell their armies guns and armaments, they take the oil money and funnel it to radicals and revolutionaries who want to attack our homeland.
                    And yet... we're killing off oil pipelines meant to keep more oil production and revenues in North America, and AWAY from the middle east. Disjointed nonsense.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by RoyalShock View Post
                      Apparently, Republicans are supposed to know.

                      If they hadn't said anything at all, the article would be, "GOP silent, insensitive in wake of shooting".

                      The media sucks and I'm sick of them.
                      Most republicans get their money from the NRA. You and I both know that lobbyist money is directed and intended to achieve a legislative result, or in this case, no result at all.

                      You may believe the media sucks, but to make an analogy, it's raining hard, the lake behind the dam (the NRA) is getting full and at some point it will break.

                      Again, praying will not fix the problem, action will.

                      Here's an easy one for those wondering what to do:
                      Every individual on the no-fly list can go to their local gun store and buy all the guns and ammo they want. Legally. We won't let them fly on planes because we're concerned they might blow one up, but we are not apparently concerned with them going to their neighborhood gun store and stocking up.

                      And if that strikes you as odd, you might ask yourself why we haven't seen legislation drafted to address this gap.

                      The reason (or politician, for that matter) is that any republican that writes a bill addressing gun ownership will automatically incur the wrath of the NRA. Whether it makes sense or not.

                      Another area that could be fixed easily is the lack of consistency between state gun registries. Seems like there should be a framework that ensures consistency. Having the federal government do it makes sense. The NRA could be engaging people at this point to ensure the best possible outcome, but they don't want to.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by SHOCKvalue View Post
                        And yet... we're killing off oil pipelines meant to keep more oil production and revenues in North America, and AWAY from the middle east. Disjointed nonsense.
                        "All the jobs" supposedly created by the Trans-Canada pipeline will disappear as soon as the pipeline is built. As an construction engineer you ought to understand that.

                        The second part of this, and the part that you don't know about, is that the pipeline will actually carry a tar sand slurry from Canada, which at the current price of oil (and the future price for at least the next year or two) will not support the added expense of extracting the oil from the tar sands.

                        The third part of this, which again you don't know, is this: They were digging open-air pits in the Beaumont, Texas area as a proof of concept. Extracting the oil from the tar sand requires the use of noxious solvents in an open-air environment which means that chemical vapors from the process will drift over peoples businesses and homes. Not only that, what do you do with the remnants of the solvent and contaminated sand? That's another superfund site waiting to happen. Like always, the chemical companies make the mess and then the taxpayers pay to clean it up (corporate welfare at its best).

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by RoyalShock View Post
                          Apparently, Republicans are supposed to know.

                          If they hadn't said anything at all, the article would be, "GOP silent, insensitive in wake of shooting".

                          The media sucks and I'm sick of them.
                          I expect my elected officials to know regardless of political affiliation. But you cannot keep saying "well we'll pray for them" when you are in a position to enact some sort of change.
                          "

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by shocka khan View Post
                            "All the jobs" supposedly created by the Trans-Canada pipeline will disappear as soon as the pipeline is built. As an construction engineer you ought to understand that.

                            The second part of this, and the part that you don't know about, is that the pipeline will actually carry a tar sand slurry from Canada, which at the current price of oil (and the future price for at least the next year or two) will not support the added expense of extracting the oil from the tar sands.

                            The third part of this, which again you don't know, is this: They were digging open-air pits in the Beaumont, Texas area as a proof of concept. Extracting the oil from the tar sand requires the use of noxious solvents in an open-air environment which means that chemical vapors from the process will drift over peoples businesses and homes. Not only that, what do you do with the remnants of the solvent and contaminated sand? That's another superfund site waiting to happen. Like always, the chemical companies make the mess and then the taxpayers pay to clean it up (corporate welfare at its best).
                            Kahn you really need to ease up on the guessing of what people do. I'm not a civil engineer. The word engineer has not once graced me in an academic setting or a professional one.

                            The oil that was going to be transported with the additional capacity that the Keystone XL would have allowed will now be coming here via train and semi-truck. Out of the three methods of oil transport there, which one do you suppose poses the smallest risk to life and property? It is a pretty easy answer, because the best option is better in such regards by order of magnitude.

                            The point isn't about the construction jobs or environmental tangents you ran down; it is about keeping money away from the middle east kooks. ANY North American oil production helps that.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Awesome Sauce Malone View Post
                              I expect my elected officials to know regardless of political affiliation. But you cannot keep saying "well we'll pray for them" when you are in a position to enact some sort of change.
                              "
                              You don't start talking or enacting change the day of a tragedy. Wait until the emotions die down and the issue can be discussed rationally. I despise the left for their jumping on every crisis and tragedy before the victim's bodies are cold.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                A better framework would have prevented this. We need more frameworks. Going forward, in an impactful, dedicated manner, initiating a common and forward thinking framework, we can overcome the challenges of the past and lead us to greater unity and purpose in the future.
                                There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X