Mizuno Invitational @ Rice

[1972Shocker]

Sarah McGee hitting a robust .800 with 7 block assists.

Dominating. Actually Sarah is 9-0-11 on her attacks for an 0.818 hitting percentage. Add her blocks into the mix and she is doing some serious scoring.

:goshocks:

[The Mad Hatter]

According to GameTracker Shocks take Set 2 by a 25-12 score.

Do you have the GameTracker link?

Thanks.

[dregn]

http://www.cstv.com/gametracker/launch/gt_wvolley.html?event=834568&school=ncaa&sport=wvolley&camefrom=&startschool=&

[1972Shocker]

10-12-10 Sweep.

[1972Shocker]

This is going to be quick and painless.

Quick yes. Painless? Not for Harvard.

[dregn]

What happened with Katie that she wasn't avaliable?

[1972Shocker]

What is going on with Katie. I did not hear -- is she sick?

[SpanglerFan316]

Against a team like Harvard, can't we avoid some of these service errors?

[SpanglerFan316]

What is going on with Katie. I did not hear -- is she sick?

Ab strain or pull

[dregn]

Sounds like on Lamb's last comment they wanted to rest Katie and Amanda, sounds like maybe small injuries that they can play through, but rest is good?

[WuDrWu]

This is going to be quick and painless.

Quick yes. Painless? Not for Harvard.

See above "frog" comment.

[1972Shocker]

Tomorrow should be much tougher and more interesting.

Hopefully, both Katie and Amanda will be available and at least close to full strength.

:goshocks:

[WuDrWu]

I still think matches like that should involve far more of the Emily Adneys, Jada Withams, Dana Loganbills, Jackie Churches and anyone else that isn't going to redshirt.

I also think that having only one setter on the team, on a top 25 team, for the entire season is playing with fire. I understand why, totally, but I just don't think it is the best idea.

[1972Shocker]

I still think matches like that should involve far more of the Emily Adneys, Jada Withams, Dana Loganbills, Jackie Churches and anyone else that isn't going to redshirt.

I also think that having only one setter on the team, on a top 25 team, for the entire season is playing with fire. I understand why, totally, but I just don't think it is the best idea.

I don't know about the setter issue one way or the other. I will defer to Lambo on that. I am sure he is thinking about this year and the future.

Regarding your 1st point I agree.

[SpanglerFan316]

I still think matches like that should involve far more of the Emily Adneys, Jada Withams, Dana Loganbills, Jackie Churches and anyone else that isn't going to redshirt.

I also think that having only one setter on the team, on a top 25 team, for the entire season is playing with fire. I understand why, totally, but I just don't think it is the best idea.

I agree but Feekin would burn a year with little actual setting if she played this year.

More Dana, Jackie, Jada, Kim, EA, etc. :yes: