Originally posted by AndShock
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2016-17 Bracketology
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by SlyShock View PostCasting a wide net there. Realistically, our ceiling is a 7 with the selection committee. It's just not going to happen any other way. Do we know we deserve better? Absolutely, but we've seen year in and year out how this goes. I'd predict an 8 seed given our current situation. Highly doubt we end up anything over 10.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockerFever View PostOn CBS Sports Channel, Steve Lappas just called out his CBS cohort Jerry Palm. Making fun of the fact that Palm has WSU seeded 11. Has a dinner bet going with Rothstein (Palm's doomsday sidekick) about WSU being an 11.
I mean, I just find it hilarious that his own CBS colleagues are calling him out this badly and routinely. Does Lunardi ever get called out on ESPN? NOPE.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wufan View PostNepotism. Having seen him on television, it's quite clear that Doug Gottliebs dad impregnated his sister.
Maybe we should consider sterilization for the whole fam damily? I bet it would improve the gene pool.
Comment
-
Yesterday during halftime of one of the games, Jay Williams was flabbergasted Lunardi had ILST in over IOWA, although Lunardi owned him pretty good ("unlike the committee, I think losses matter"). I remember Jay Williams being pretty dismissive towards us last year too. He's the epitome of blind deference to P5's and only having a job because DOOK. Quickly reminded me why I never watch ESPN.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostYeah, the inclusion of Cal is insane. Only 6 of the 107 brackets on the matrix have them in. To have them in ahead of WSU is bonkers.
RPI
WSU - 29
Cal - 56
KenPom
WSU - 10
Cal - 55
vs KenPom "A rated" games
WSU: 2-4
Cal: 1-8
vs KenPom "B rated" games
WSU: 6-0
Cal: 3-3
Best win
WSU @ISUr (RPI 30, KenPom 49)
Cal: @USC (RPI 39, KenPom 59)
Comment
-
Originally posted by AG1219 View PostThe crazy thing about this is if wsu beat Cal it wouldn't be a top 50 win that is needed to gain at large. They are not good enough to be a good win, but are better than wsu.FINAL FOURS:
1965, 2013
NCAA Tournament:
1964, 1965, 1976, 1981, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2006, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021
NIT Champs - 1 (2011)
AP Poll History of Wichita St:
Number of Times Ranked: 157
Number of Times Ranked #1: 1
Number of Times Top 5: 32 (Most Recent - 2017)
Number of Times Top 10: 73 (Most Recent - 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017)
Highest Recent AP Ranking:
#3 - Dec. 2017
#2 ~ March 2014
Highest Recent Coaches Poll Ranking:
#2 ~ March 2014
Finished 2013 Season #4
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockerGirl View PostYesterday during halftime of one of the games, Jay Williams was flabbergasted Lunardi had ILST in over IOWA, although Lunardi owned him pretty good ("unlike the committee, I think losses matter"). I remember Jay Williams being pretty dismissive towards us last year too. He's the epitome of blind deference to P5's and only having a job because DOOK. Quickly reminded me why I never watch ESPN.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RoyalShock View PostIf Lunardi's job is to predict what the committee will do - as I understand it to be - saying "unlike the committee, I think losses matter" means he's not doing his job.
Comment
-
Here is a 15 minute interview with Schaus about the selection process if anyone wants something to listen to. I couldn't figure out how to link directly to the podcast from my phone but you should be able to play it from inside the tweet.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AndShock View Posthttps://twitter.com/russeisenstein/s...92268777598977
Here is a 15 minute interview with Schaus about the selection process if anyone wants something to listen to. I couldn't figure out how to link directly to the podcast from my phone but you should be able to play it from inside the tweet.
Comment
Comment