how were post game comments?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MVC Tourney - WSU vs UNI Game Thread
Collapse
X
-
Talk about a nemesis: if the UNIs hadn't had that goofball loss at Loyola right after winning here -- if they hadn't been SWEPT by Loyola, for heaven's sake -- they'd have been part of a three-way tie with the Jailbirds and evansville at 12-6, and they'd have been either the #2 or #3 seed (they split with IllSt, swept UE). S
So they'd have been in the other bracket, the Shocks wouldn't have faced them until Sunday, and would have had a Saturday game against presumably the winner of SIU vs. Evansville (I'm assuming the 1-3 round robin record against the other 12-6 teams would have landed the Aces as the #4 seed), which would have been darn near a free pass to the championship. Instead, the UNIs messed up the Shocks by losing, then messed them up by winning. Pain in the butt.
Of course, the Shocks weren't exactly innocent bystanders in the game Saturday, and if WSU had done its job at Koch Arena three weeks ago then UNI would have been seeded fourth no matter what, so there's a limit on how much sympathy they deserve. Sometimes you just have to do your job and win, and then these weird quirks of fate don't get in the way. But what a strange quirk it was.
Meanwhile, mjb, here's what appeared post-game on goshockers: http://sidearm.sites.s3.amazonaws.co...WSU.pdf?id=910
Comment
-
This game sucked, but we should be in the NCAA. But losing like this is the worst way to come into the tournament. We didn't lose to an opponent at the top of their game. We didn't lose giving our best effort, our best game.
We lost to a team that struggled to score a single point in the first 10 minutes. We lost to a team did literally the same play possession after possession. It is the worst game I've ever seen Marshall coach. We made no visible adjustments to combat the absolute simplest game plan we've ever played against.
If UNI plays like that against Evansville they'd lose by 15, and the aces are far from world beaters.
We lost because we played like garbage on offense. It is not possible to beat an NIT level team with that offense. That was Bradley on their worst game of the season bad. We did the same thing over and over again and expected different results. Fred driving, getting double teamed and passing to Ron. Our underclassmen have been ignored this tournament.
We played just a little better and barely won against a terrible Loyola team yesterday. It was a miserable tournament.
Overall, I expect a 10 seed. I have a hard time being optimistic about winning a single game against literally any NCAA team though, let alone a run. Just too bad at offense. We'll beat ourselves, no need for an unfavorable match up. Not a good team this year compared the past four, not a good season. Not good in close games. Too selfish when games get tight. No team in D1 hurt by 3s like us.
I won't waste another word on it. We'll go to the tournament and we'll lose at some point. I'm not sure why this season turned out like this. The juxtaposition of expectation and result is hard to bear. Should not have gone down like this.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CBB_Fan View PostI'm not sure why this season turned out like this. The juxtaposition of expectation and result is hard to bear. Should not have gone down like this.
First, it was Fred getting injured. Then, Landry went down. Then Grady.
I thought everything was going to be fine once everyone came back. For the most part, it was. Though, you could still see warts show up in games (@Seton Hall, @ISUr, home vs UNI, all weekend in STL).
It very perplexing how this team can go from seeming world beaters one day, to struggling to beat almost anyone the next week. How they can go from getting everyone involved and rolling to having to go strictly to Ron and Fred.
I hope they get in and I hope they have a chance to go down swinging. It would be almost impossible to imagine this chapter of Shox basketball (Fred and Ron) ending in the NIT. I believe the committee just might actually share that sentiment; every year they have been in it has been memorable.The Assman
Comment
-
Originally posted by SHURTZtheHERTZ View PostThis is the saddest thing of all. Ever since the beginning of the season, something was off.
First, it was Fred getting injured. Then, Landry went down. Then Grady.
I thought everything was going to be fine once everyone came back. For the most part, it was. Though, you could still see warts show up in games (@Seton Hall, @ISUr, home vs UNI, all weekend in STL).
It very perplexing how this team can go from seeming world beaters one day, to struggling to beat almost anyone the next week. How they can go from getting everyone involved and rolling to having to go strictly to Ron and Fred.
I hope they get in and I hope they have a chance to go down swinging. It would be almost impossible to imagine this chapter of Shox basketball (Fred and Ron) ending in the NIT. I believe the committee just might actually share that sentiment; every year they have been in it has been memorable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ISASO View PostNot having a single big man who demanded the ball and deserved touches inside handicapped the offense. We knew this would be the single most critical problem to solve a year ago. Did we get that done? Not so much.
Comment
-
I think UNI and Ben Jacobsen deserve a bunch of credit but aren't getting much on this board. Our defense was good enough to win but we have to hit some open shots. Sure, we could've gone zone to stop the dribble penetration but who knows how effective it would've been? Holding a team to 47 in regulation should be enough.
Comment
-
2 of 24 from the three for a season low 8.3% for the 222nd best 3 point shooting team in D-1. After this performance the Shocks drop to 258th (of 351) best 3 point shooting team.“Losers Average Losers.” ― Paul Tudor Jones
Comment
-
Originally posted by DUShock View Post2 of 24 from the three for a season low 8.3% for the 222nd best 3 point shooting team in D-1. After this performance the Shocks drop to 258th (of 351) best 3 point shooting team.
Comment
-
@proshox: This is often the case and was on many possessions yesterday, credit to UNI defense, anecdotally however, we did get a number of quality open looks and failed to convert. HCGM recruits good shooters but this season has they have been Jekyll & Hyde.“Losers Average Losers.” ― Paul Tudor Jones
Comment
-
Originally posted by DUShock View Post2 of 24 from the three for a season low 8.3% for the 222nd best 3 point shooting team in D-1. After this performance the Shocks drop to 258th (of 351) best 3 point shooting team.
It's just unbelievable how predictable it is.Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
- a smart man
Comment
-
Originally posted by pie n eye View PostThat's really what it boils down to. We are one the best defensive teams in the country so even a poor three point shooting night (by other teams standards like 30%) should be enough for us to win most games. Definitely yesterday.
I thought Ben Jacobsen's great adjustment was taking Koch out in the early to mid part of the second half to unclog the lane for washspun. Koch was totally ineffective
We had at least 15 good looks from three by five different guys and couldn't make a single one. We played quite well enough to win but came up one layup, one three pointer or defensive my one banked three pointer from winning"I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
---------------------------------------
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
"We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".
A physician called into a radio show and said:
"That's the definition of a stool sample."
Comment
Comment