Mine too...but I'm learning some things from this conversation. A lot of these metrics certainly point to the B12 being better than I thought defensively. But I have to agree with CDizzle, does that mean their offenses were sub par in the tournament? I really don't know. If so, was it just natural regression, or was it because they were playing teams that were more "fired up" defensively?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Games of Interest (2015-16 Edition)
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by MoValley John View PostMy brain hurts.
"KU is a bunch of pansy asses."
"Yeah, but they are really good pansy asses."
"Mathematically, there's just not enough data to prove they are pansy asses, but they do pass the pansy ass scheduling test."
"Also they can be pansy asses AND ninny-muggins at the same time!"
"Your mom liked my ninny-muggins last night."
"Your wife's photos I posted are rated a 10 on SkinPom -- and man, did she pass MY eye test."Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
-
I think my favorite thing is when we insult KU for the heck of it because we are WSU fans and then people come along with metrics to show us that's wrong.
I don't think there is any real doubt that KU is a good program. That's not the point at all. @Kung Wu:, I'd say your breakdown is exactly correct :) That's the depth of this argument, yet people try to make it an actual thing.
I'm allowed to insult KU, the Big 12 and Creighton as much as I want, regardless of facts.
Comment
-
Which basketball team is softer, the Harlem Globetrotters or the Bud Light Daredevils?
I want metrics and facts, no opinions or eye tests.There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostLet's look at KU vs New Mexico State from last year's tournament. New Mexico State was a slightly better than average offensive team (ranked 124th nationally).
2015 D1 average - 102 pts per 100 possessions.
2015 Kansas - Defensive Efficiency: 91.7 (10th nationally)
KU’s expected defensive efficiency when adjusted for playing vs New Mexico State: 93.9
In the round of 64, KU won 75-56 in a game with 61 possessions. KU’s defensive efficiency for that game: 91.8 (slightly better than expectations)
Shorthand, I could describe KU’s defensive performance vs New Mexico State as follows:
KU vs New Mexico State: -2.1
Using that shorthand format, here are all the Big 12 Tourney games from last year:
KU vs New Mexico State: -2.1
KU vs Wichita State:+9.6
OU vs Albany: +8.3
OU vs Dayton: +4.2
OU vs Michigan State: +9.1
Baylor vs Georgia State: -4.0
Iowa State vs UAB: -11.7
Texas vs Butler: -4.7
West Virginia vs Buffalo: -6.7
West Virginia vs Maryland: -11.0
West Virginia vs Kentucky: +9.2
Oklahoma State vs Oregon: +4.2
Average: +0.4
Conclusion:
The Big 12's tournament performances last year were almost an exact match to KenPom's expectations. Some games were better, some worse, but in 12 games, the Big XII teams played defense right in line with their season long rankings. If you want to argue that scheduling caused their season long defensive ratings to become inflated, then we should have seen them underperform once the Big Dance started and they began playing only non-conf opponents on neutral floors. The fact that the 12 games in the Big Dance are very much in line with the overall rankings helps to confirm the validity of the overall rankings.
Basically, Big 12 teams were ranked as quality defenses entering the tournament, and they performed as such in their tournament games. As far as last year goes, the NCAA Tournament helped to confirm that the Big 12 was full of quality defensive teams.Livin the dream
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave Stalwart View Post
I'm allowed to insult KU, the Big 12 and Creighton as much as I want, regardless of facts.
#ForAmerica"When life hands you lemons, make lemonade." Better have some sugar and water too, or else your lemonade will suck!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Play Angry View PostKU struggling just a bit with RPI #159 Oklahoma State in Stillwater.
Seriously, sad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Play Angry View PostKU struggling just a bit with RPI #159 Oklahoma State in Stillwater.2014 RTS Fantasy Championship National Champion $200,000 (2460 teams)
2012 NFFC Online National Champion $100,000 (1872 teams)
2014 DFWC National Champion $9,250 (288 teams)
2015 RTS Fantasy Championship 2nd Place $25,000 (3120 teams)
2015 NCAA Bracketology (351 pts more than all 136 at the bracket matrix)
Kentucky Wildcats National Champions 2012 1998 1996 1978 1958 1951 1949 1948
The Ohio State Buckeyes National Champions 2014 2002 1970 1968 1961 1957 1954 1942
Comment
Comment