Originally posted by Shockadelica
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2015-16 Media love thread
Collapse
X
-
ESPN Insider - http://espn.go.com/blog/ncbrecruitin.../post?id=15702
There’s a school of thought that says future NBA players and high-level talent are what wins in March -- but is there a correlation between recruiting five-star talents and churning out 25-win seasons or earning conference titles? Over the past couple of weeks, we have gone through ESPN’s ranking of the past four recruiting classes and taken a look at how recruiting classes have compared to results.
We put a little more focus on total wins and success over the course of a full season as opposed to a team getting hot and going on a run in March. One thing to note regarding the overachievers is that we left out some programs that put an emphasis on prospects that don’t impact our recruiting rankings. As a result, programs like Iowa State (transfers) and Gonzaga (European players) didn’t make the cut -- despite obviously overachieving compared to their recruiting class rankings.
#5 - Wichita State: Over the past four seasons, the Shockers have 111 wins, a Final Four appearance and a No. 1 seed. Over the 2012-15 span, the Shockers had zero ranked recruiting classes. This has been well-documented. Fred VanVleet, despite being an ESPN 100 prospect, and Ron Baker essentially came out of nowhere to become one of the best backcourts in college basketball -- while Cleanthony Early developed quickly into an NBA draft pick. Gregg Marshall has done a tremendous job since taking over at Wichita State, and shows no signs of slowing down.
Footnote: I may have cabbaged up this post to meet guidelines. If so, I apologize. The essence of the writer's opinion is who gets the most out of the least or something like that."Prediction is very difficult, especially if it is about the future."
--Niels Bohr
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ricardo del Rio View PostESPN Insider - http://espn.go.com/blog/ncbrecruitin.../post?id=15702
There’s a school of thought that says future NBA players and high-level talent are what wins in March -- but is there a correlation between recruiting five-star talents and churning out 25-win seasons or earning conference titles? Over the past couple of weeks, we have gone through ESPN’s ranking of the past four recruiting classes and taken a look at how recruiting classes have compared to results.
We put a little more focus on total wins and success over the course of a full season as opposed to a team getting hot and going on a run in March. One thing to note regarding the overachievers is that we left out some programs that put an emphasis on prospects that don’t impact our recruiting rankings. As a result, programs like Iowa State (transfers) and Gonzaga (European players) didn’t make the cut -- despite obviously overachieving compared to their recruiting class rankings.
#5 - Wichita State: Over the past four seasons, the Shockers have 111 wins, a Final Four appearance and a No. 1 seed. Over the 2012-15 span, the Shockers had zero ranked recruiting classes. This has been well-documented. Fred VanVleet, despite being an ESPN 100 prospect, and Ron Baker essentially came out of nowhere to become one of the best backcourts in college basketball -- while Cleanthony Early developed quickly into an NBA draft pick. Gregg Marshall has done a tremendous job since taking over at Wichita State, and shows no signs of slowing down.
Footnote: I may have cabbaged up this post to meet guidelines. If so, I apologize. The essence of the writer's opinion is who gets the most out of the least or something like that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Onegreatracer View PostA quick highlight video I threw together of some of my favorite plays of the year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Prau...ature=youtu.be
Comment
-
Originally posted by Onegreatracer View PostA quick highlight video I threw together of some of my favorite plays of the year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Prau...ature=youtu.be
Comment
Comment