Should Shocker fans buy tickets for the Omaha regional just in case? Last year I bought tickets for the STL regional ahead of time and it worked out well.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2015 Bracketology
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Shocker-maniac View PostShould Shocker fans buy tickets for the Omaha regional just in case? Last year I bought tickets for the STL regional ahead of time and it worked out well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AndShock View PostMight as well because you won't have any problem unloading them but it's doubtful we end up in Omaha this year.
We definitely need to run the table to even have a chance at Omaha though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shocker-maniac View PostBecause a 4-seed isn't high enough to get geographic preference? Or other factors?
In this case, no more than 2 protected seeds will be sent to Omaha (one for each pod). There are a whole host of others with similar proximity (Kansas, Wisconsin, Iowa State, and so on) who we are duking it out with for those two spots.
We could end up as high as a 2 seed and still be behind two others in the pecking order for the Omaha regional. Sucks when the Committee clumps the sites so much in certain regions like they did this year. Having just one more semi-close location like Denver, Dallas, Little Rock, etc. would have created such better balance.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Play Angry View PostTop 4 seeds are protected, but that only means they won't be placed at a geographic disadvantage for their Round of 64 game. Usually they get treated favorably w/r/t location but there is no guarantee.
In this case, no more than 2 protected seeds will be sent to Omaha (one for each pod). There are a whole host of others with similar proximity (Kansas, Wisconsin, Iowa State, and so on) who we are duking it out with for those two spots.
We could end up as high as a 2 seed and still be behind two others in the pecking order for the Omaha regional. Sucks when the Committee clumps the sites so much in certain regions like they did this year. Having just one more semi-close location like Denver, Dallas, Little Rock, etc. would have created such better balance.ShockerNet is a rat infested cess pool.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View Post#4 seeds risk seeing Kentucky in the Sweet 16. #3 seeds get that matchup delayed for at least 1 more round. Considering Lunardi's current group of #4 seeds includes WSU, UNI, Iowa State, and OU, it seems any of those teams could easily end up in Kentucky's region as all are relatively close geographically. It will be an interesting race to the finish to see which teams can finish well and possibly jump into the #3 seed. Even if WSU went to a different region than Kentucky, I'd much rather see WSU as a #3 seed and avoid the likes of Duke, Virginia, and Gonzaga (the other likely #1s) for a bit longer.
One last thing...
Sorry Mr. Therapy, I just couldn't resist.
There's no way a sane person would care or still remember a random person's posts from months ago.Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
- a smart man
Comment
-
Futher proving that he's a hack, Jerry Palm drops us to an 8 seed. The teams that he has ahead of us that shouldn't be are too numerous to list, but you can see for yourself here:
Comment
-
Jerry Palm is HORRIBLE at bracketology. He regularly finishes way below the average blogger who just does it for fun.
Just for reference, over at the http://bracketmatrix.com/, WSU is currently a 5 seed. There are something like 100 people's predictions being tracked. I see ONE 8 seed out of the whole group!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shock Therapy View PostFuther proving that he's a hack, Jerry Palm drops us to an 8 seed. The teams that he has ahead of us that shouldn't be are too numerous to list, but you can see for yourself here:
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology
Oh well, just keep winning. Luckily guys like him have nothing to do with the actual bracket process.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shock Therapy View PostFuther proving that he's a hack, Jerry Palm drops us to an 8 seed. The teams that he has ahead of us that shouldn't be are too numerous to list, but you can see for yourself here:
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology
Regards the seeding for the Shockers in this year's tournament, too many teams will have superior records for the Shockers to be seeded higher than #3, even if the Shockers win out. Barring a major meltdown by one of the following teams, I think the seeds will be:
1 - Kentucky, as they are very likely to be undefeated and ranked #1 in both polls
1 - Gonzaga
1 - Virginia
1 - Duke, as they beat Wisconsin in Madison early in the season
2 - Wisconsin
2 - Villanova
2 - Arizona
2 - Kansas, due to historical bias and an 11th consecutive Big 12 Title
Leaving the Shockers to compete with the likes of Louisville, UNC and Utah for the #3 seed
Comment
-
Originally posted by wushock27 View PostLouisville is VASTLY overrated... They will be exposed very early in the tournament, but hitting a very soft part of their ACC schedule now
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shock Therapy View PostSo is North Carolina. And Notre Dame, while being really good, had such a horrible noncon schedule that I would be genuinely surprised if the comittee gives them the 3 seed that all the bracketologists think that they deserve.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shocker1976 View PostIMO you are correct but history informs that Conference Membership and the name on Jersey helps in the seeding process of the NCAA Tournament. So teams like Kansas, Louisville, UNC and Notre Dame will capture seeds that they do not IMO deserve.
Comment
Comment