To illustrate the problems with offense in the B12, just look at the assist-to-turnover rankings. This gives a pretty good gauge of how well teams play within a team concept that prioritizes making the right decisions, both to get the assist and avoid the turnover. Here are the B12 national rankings:
t7. Iowa State (tied with Wichita State)
66. Baylor
96. West Virginia
102. TCU
106. Kansas
138. Oklahoma
181. Texas
188. Kansas State
229. Oklahoma State
313. Texas Tech
For comparison, here is the ACC:
2. Pittsburgh
4. Notre Dame
6. Virginia
15. North Carolina
24. Duke
33. Miami
34. Syracuse
118. NC State
128. Boston College
138. Wake Forest
t181. Virginia Tech
t181. Louisville
219. Georgia Tech
262. Clemson
291. Florida State
This pretty much matches my observations in which Iowa State looks like the only B12 team with much sophistication in offensive scheme and ball movement. It turns out that, if you are not physically overmatched like many of the B12's OOC opponents, it is relatively easy to look good defensively if your opponents are mostly trying to go 1 on 1.
t7. Iowa State (tied with Wichita State)
66. Baylor
96. West Virginia
102. TCU
106. Kansas
138. Oklahoma
181. Texas
188. Kansas State
229. Oklahoma State
313. Texas Tech
For comparison, here is the ACC:
2. Pittsburgh
4. Notre Dame
6. Virginia
15. North Carolina
24. Duke
33. Miami
34. Syracuse
118. NC State
128. Boston College
138. Wake Forest
t181. Virginia Tech
t181. Louisville
219. Georgia Tech
262. Clemson
291. Florida State
This pretty much matches my observations in which Iowa State looks like the only B12 team with much sophistication in offensive scheme and ball movement. It turns out that, if you are not physically overmatched like many of the B12's OOC opponents, it is relatively easy to look good defensively if your opponents are mostly trying to go 1 on 1.
Comment