1st possession. 2 offensive rebounds given up.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rebounding Huge Weakness-
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Shockm View Post
And those misses resulted in a Top 40 Rebounding Team 17 out of 18 years. Lots of excuses. NO ACCOUNTABILITY. which is what GM preached all the time
Last year (2020) WSU finished tied for 27th nationally in team rebounds at 39.3 per game. Thus far this year they are tied for 30th (updated to 15 games) at 39.7 per game (actually more boards per game). Here are some team rebounding stats from the last 5 years:
2019: Tied for 57th at 37.8.
2018: Tied for 9th at 40.5.
2017: Tied for 5th at 40.8.
2016: Tied for 99th at 37.5 (Play-in)
2015: Tied for 104th at 35.6 (The year we beat the ChickenHawks).
Reference: http://www.espn.com/mens-college-bas.../stat/rebounds
Comment
-
Number of rebound opportunities matters. Rebound differential is my go to.Infinity Art Glass - Fantastic local artist and Shocker fan
RIP Guy Always A Shocker
Carpenter Place - A blessing to many young girls/women
ICT S.O.S - Great local cause fighting against human trafficking
Wartick Insurance Agency - Saved me money with more coverage.
Save Shocker Sports - A rallying cry
Comment
-
Originally posted by SubGod22 View PostNumber of rebound opportunities matters. Rebound differential is my go to.
Team A shoots 10-40 and has 10 offensive rebounds.
Team B shoots 10-20 and has 5 offensive rebounds.
Team A has a 5 rebound edge but only grabbed 33% of available rebounds. Team B “loses” by 5 but grabbed 50% of available rebounds.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by pie n eye View Post
Here is why rebound rate is a better stat in my opinion.
Team A shoots 10-40 and has 10 offensive rebounds.
Team B shoots 10-20 and has 5 offensive rebounds.
Team A has a 5 rebound edge but only grabbed 33% of available rebounds. Team B “loses” by 5 but grabbed 50% of available rebounds.Infinity Art Glass - Fantastic local artist and Shocker fan
RIP Guy Always A Shocker
Carpenter Place - A blessing to many young girls/women
ICT S.O.S - Great local cause fighting against human trafficking
Wartick Insurance Agency - Saved me money with more coverage.
Save Shocker Sports - A rallying cry
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by SubGod22 View PostNumber of rebound opportunities matters. Rebound differential is my go to.
Tonight we were -4. The only games we have finished rebounding in the + column are Tulsa twice who is rated lower than us on percentage opportunities (250 last I checked), and Ole Miss who is actually a very good rebounding team and ranks in the Top 50 (last I checked). We out rebounded Mississippi by +3.
ORU is ranked lower than us but still out rebounded us by -2. That shows how bad we are.
By the way, Eldridge’s story in the paper said we were 340 on defensive rebounds. I’ve never researched anything but total rebounds. Total rebounds are the numbers I gave you above. We are worse on defensive rebounding.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pie n eye View Post
Here is why rebound rate is a better stat in my opinion.
Team A shoots 10-40 and has 10 offensive rebounds.
Team B shoots 10-20 and has 5 offensive rebounds.
Team A has a 5 rebound edge but only grabbed 33% of available rebounds. Team B “loses” by 5 but grabbed 50% of available rebounds.
This must be similar to what #s Taylor is talking about.The Assman
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shock Top View Post
Team B also gets 66% of available defensive RBS. Whereas, Team A only grabs 50%.
This must be similar to what #s Taylor is talking about.
And he said we are #340 on defensive rebs. We are #243 on this table (total rebs) that goes through today. Feb. 10. I don’t think it includes tonight.
https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-ba...ing-percentage
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shockm View Post
This is an NCAA rebounding percentage table. It shows only total percentages. Taylor’s broke it down even more with offense and defensive rebounds.
And he said we are #340 on defensive rebs. We are #243 on this table (total rebs) that goes through today. Feb. 10. I don’t think it includes tonight.
https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-ba...ing-percentage
Offensive rebound rate - https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-ba...rebounding-pct
Defensive rebound rate - https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-ba...rebounding-pct
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockerFever View Post
Maybe they became great rebounders at his practices.
If you want to blame coaching for the lack of boards, it's the guys with a couple years under Marshall who are disappointing and it's the guys who've had about equal coaching from Marshall and Brown that rebound better.
If Poor Bear and Udeze became great rebounders under Marshall's practices, they would still be great rebounders after just a couple of months under Brown's coaching.The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment