Originally posted by Singeril
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Coach Gregg Marshall Investigation
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Shockm View Post
Obviously, there are many variables and obviously, it’s impossible to know whether or how many donations are because of great national athletic publicity. However, for you to totally discount that there is a correlation is simply ridiculous, beyond common sense, and shows either a lack of emotional integrity, bias, or lack of intelligence.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Singeril View Post
Where did I "totally discount" there was a correlation? never did anything of the sort. Talk about emotional integrity, bias, and lack of intelligence....Wow. Re-read my posts and show me where I "totally discounted" the influence. I'm saying, however, that the amount that is passed down from the athletic department to the other colleges is not what you might think. I am also disputing the claim that was made earlier, even in jest, that there are some faculty members that wouldn't be at the university if it weren't for the success of Marshall (and I am a HUGE fan of his). And, as we have read here before, there is much in the athletic department that is actually completely separate from the university.Last edited by shoxlax; October 18, 2020, 04:59 PM.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by shoxlax View Post
Fair point. However, most of the Liberal Arts and Fine Arts programs aren’t bleeding enrollment. Hence the fight last year on required electives. In other words, the College of Engineering, Barton School of Business and Innovation Campus are swallowing up their standing on campus. So when someone screams “look at me, we have an injustice” it makes you wonder if attempting to stay relative is part of their motive.
Comment
-
Does Teacher John Doe in this hypothetical situation have a $15 million dollar buyout that was negotiated after the teacher brought in unprecedented national attention to the university?
I really don’t care to hear the opinion of many WSU faculty in this situation, least of all from LAS faculty who have other colleges to thank for their over-inflated paychecks. Not to mention, they’re not really even paid from the same pool of money that Gregg is, so what do they care?"In God we trust, all others must bring data." - W. Edwards Deming
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Singeril View Postif a history teacher DID commit one of these “alleged offenses”, there wouldn’t be much mercy coming during the investigation.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Shockm;n1255399]
The result of your example is that no one would have known about the alleged offenses, except possibly for a few students of that History or Sociology Teacher. The Sociology teacher should have kept his mouth closed. He isn’t relevant no matter how much he wishes to be. Most Sociology Majors go into obscurity after they graduate because there aren’t many jobs to support them. I don’t know all of the particulars about WSU Sociology, but Hayton may very well be lucky to have a job.[/QUOTE
Whether it is a sociology teacher or if sociologists have jobs is also irrelevant. But if any teacher did the things Marshall is alleged to have done, it would be known in the Sunflower and Eagle very quick—a lot faster than it has taken for any of this to come to light to this point (if it is even legitimate). Word moves VERY fast on campus between students.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockingButTrue View Post
I thought the investigation was supposed to end either last week or this week?
If the allegations are substantiated, he will be fired for cause or they could say the AD department knew about it and addressed it years ago thereby letting Marshall off the hook. They then still need to protect the school from potential lawsuits.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shock Top View PostSo, Mr. Hayton would be fine being suspended and his reputation ruined if I randomly called in the the university and say he abused me and that I wanted to remain anonymous?
I mean, he wouldn’t not want the university to take my allegations seriously, right?!
What did Hayton mean with his comment
“The fact that WSU won’t take a principled stand against physical and verbal abuse is yet another black mark on this institution’s reputation.”
Looks ike a biased comment to me.
Read more here: https://www.kansas.com/news/politics...#storylink=cpy
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by shoxlax View Post
Fair point. However, most of the Liberal Arts and Fine Arts programs are bleeding enrollment. Hence the fight last year on required electives. In other words, the College of Enot ngineering, Barton School of Business and Innovation Campus are swallowing up their standing on campus. So when someone screams “look at me, we have an injustice” it makes you wonder if attempting to stay relative is part of their motive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Singeril View PostWhether it is a sociology teacher or if sociologists have jobs is also irrelevant. But if any teacher did the things Marshall is alleged to have done, it would be known in the Sunflower and Eagle very quick—a lot faster than it has taken for any of this to come to light to this point (if it is even legitimate). Word moves VERY fast on campus between students.
I have no proof but I’d venture a guess that sexual harassment, and other indiscretions of different kinds between staff and students, and staff and graduate student staff that we never hear about. I’m not saying it happens often but I wouldn’t be surprised if a number of complaints against WSU personnel have occurred in the past 25 years or so that we’ve never heard of in a newspaper. Settlements are made, people are disciplined, people move, and life goes on. I’ve personally seen the scenario I just laid out in public education once, and business a couple of times. I only heard about them from individuals who were involved. No publicity. No muss, no fuss. Mostly just rumors. We hear mostly about it when complaints are brought to the police and the police bring charges but not all cases bring arrests.Last edited by Shockm; October 18, 2020, 06:15 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shockm View Post
Bull!
I have no proof but I’d venture a guess that sexual harassment, and other indiscretions of different kinds between staff and students, and staff and graduate student staff that we never hear about. I’m not saying it happens often but I wouldn’t be surprised if a number of complaints against WSU personnel have occurred in the past 25 years or so that we’ve never heard of in a newspaper. Settlements are made, people are disciplined, people move, and life goes on. I’ve personally seen the scenario I just laid out in public education once, and business a couple of times. I only heard about them from individuals who were involved. No publicity. No muss, no fuss. Mostly just rumors. We hear mostly about it when complaints are brought to the police and the police bring charges but not all cases bring arrests.
Comment
-
Does anyone know what "yet another black mark on this institution’s reputation" is supposed to mean? Is there a stack of black marks with which I am not familiar and if so, what are they?
And why is the world isn't the author of this comment not challenged on that statement?Last edited by Kung Wu; October 19, 2020, 09:49 AM.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
An employer normally suspends an employee while an investigation is done in circumstances where the allegation involves recent conduct, and there is a need to keep the accused and the accuser apart until it gets sorted out. This is an allegation that Is five years old, and the accuser(s) are nowhere in the vicinity. Hard to see why a suspension would be warranted.
- Likes 4
Comment
Comment