The 65% number is wrong. Marshall has been here 13 years. There has been an average of 2.2 transfers per year. the concentration of JuCo guys means there were typically more Sr's than any other class. To be safe let's say there were 3 guys who graduated each year. That makes a little over 5 mew players each year. Lets call it 70, but that's more complicated than we need to be.
There's been a little over 5 recruits each year and 2.2 of them have left the program. That's in the 40 - 45% range. That's in the range of 60% success rate, which isn't that different from the cherry-picked 75% rate for Sampson.
One huge difference is that Marshall was recruiting guys willing to play in the MVC and then turn those guys into consistent winners in the NCAA tourney. That's going to bump the number of players who were willing to play at WSU, but didn't fit the success model.
The other side of that argument is that 11 (I think) have left the program in the 3 years in the AAC. 11 in 3 years raises eyebrows. Could be an adjustment to recruiting higher level players, where there's not as much experience, or it could be a reflection of the massive turnover in assistants
Heiar probably wasn't too thrilled when Jans was (apparently) moved above him in the staff hierarchy, but he still left for a similar position when Jans was hired at another school. Heiar would have been associate head coach had he stayed, but he chose not to have that position here.
Waterman played for Marshall and apples don't fall far from the tree, so we probably have Marshall, Waterman, and Marshall, Jr. all chewing ass. That would be a MAJOR problem.
There's been a little over 5 recruits each year and 2.2 of them have left the program. That's in the 40 - 45% range. That's in the range of 60% success rate, which isn't that different from the cherry-picked 75% rate for Sampson.
One huge difference is that Marshall was recruiting guys willing to play in the MVC and then turn those guys into consistent winners in the NCAA tourney. That's going to bump the number of players who were willing to play at WSU, but didn't fit the success model.
The other side of that argument is that 11 (I think) have left the program in the 3 years in the AAC. 11 in 3 years raises eyebrows. Could be an adjustment to recruiting higher level players, where there's not as much experience, or it could be a reflection of the massive turnover in assistants
Heiar probably wasn't too thrilled when Jans was (apparently) moved above him in the staff hierarchy, but he still left for a similar position when Jans was hired at another school. Heiar would have been associate head coach had he stayed, but he chose not to have that position here.
Waterman played for Marshall and apples don't fall far from the tree, so we probably have Marshall, Waterman, and Marshall, Jr. all chewing ass. That would be a MAJOR problem.
Comment