Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Has anybody on here even attempted to have a political conversation with a 2018 Libtard? It's quite comical. I don't recommend it. They're basically limited to the latest CNN click-bait headline. That's the extent of the topical depth of the average #notmypresident'er.

    I'll start off in my usual deprecating manner by saying, "Look, I don't condone a lot of what the president says on Twitter..." I barely get that far before they start showing signs of melting. I follow up with, "For the sake of health and peace of mind, don't you think it's best to judge the current president on the results he is achieving and less on how he's achieving them? (This is where they blurt out 'BUT WHAT HAS HE DONE?!'). He is a brash, NYC real estate developer (those guys are borderline mafioso in their tactics); his ways are generally not our ways. Recognize that most of what you hear in the media and perhaps even from the White House is agenda driven, usually out of context, and/or just doesn't carry well across normal communication lines."

    "But he's working with the Russians!!!"
    "He's got his finger on the button and HE'S GONNA USE IT!!!"
    "He was declared mentally unfit for office!!!"
    "He's a RACIST!!!"
    "He grabs them by the *****!!!"

    *sigh*

    To gain perspective on the issue, I merely have to harken back to my grandmother and her utter disdain for Slick Willy based only on the party he represented and the exotic places he liked to dip his cigars... Historically, Willy wasn't a bad president at all. I suppose the great political divide in America is only going to get worse until all the old conservatives die off. Then we'll fully socialize this country bypassing the tipping point (which I believe immediately followed the Obama presidency) ushering in the Great American Decline. Trump, for all his faults, is sacrificing the one thing he holds dear (his reputation/ego) by attempting to stave off via shock politics what is the likely eventuality for America; secularism, socialism, atheism, amoralism.


    T


    ...:cool:

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ShockingButTrue View Post
      You're research effort was short sighted. Or, to put it in current political jargon a "false equivalent."
      The first two are primary sources. Comparing the details of previous agreements puts this one in context.

      Comment


      • ShockingButTrue
        ShockingButTrue commented
        Editing a comment
        Not-even-close... Think about it.

    • Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded View Post
      Has anybody on here even attempted to have a political conversation with a 2018 Libtard?
      Well...

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Anthroshock View Post

        The first two are primary sources. Comparing the details of previous agreements puts this one in context.
        This heifer agrees with your sources. Thank God this counterfeit Snowflake didn't win the election.

        Comment


        • Anthroshock
          Anthroshock commented
          Editing a comment
          No one cares about Hillary Clinton except right-wing republicans.

        • ShockingButTrue
          ShockingButTrue commented
          Editing a comment
          You misunderstood. It was the "context."

      • I don’t really care about her but if she broke the law (the same law I would go to jail if I broke it), and she was an elite who had influence, she should be prosecuted too.

        Comment


        • ShockingButTrue
          ShockingButTrue commented
          Editing a comment
          Yet another reason why Trump is now the President.

      • Originally posted by Shockm View Post
        I don’t really care about her but if she broke the law (the same law I would go to jail if I broke it), and she was an elite who had influence, she should be prosecuted too.
        Other facts brought up this morning in relations to this issue. There was no "Intelligence" (evidence-meaning people who had knowledge of collusion or paper/e-mail evidence) of Collusion of Trump and they went after him by launching an investigation into his election campaign approximately 1 year prior to the election, while the FBI brought up an "investigation lite" to Hillary Clinton. All they knew was that two peripheral campaign people had been to Russia and made contact with business officials while Clinton and the Dem Committee were allowed to scrub their servers and destroy evidence, and then immunity was given to Mills, Abedin, etc. and a decision had been made prior to interviewing Clinton. The Justice Department had made their minds up early not to prosecute Clinton and receive any consequences.

        Comment


        • Hey, did anyone see the "Trump Foundation" is under indictment in NY? Is that correct?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by ShockingButTrue View Post
            Hey, did anyone see the "Trump Foundation" is under indictment in NY? Is that correct?
            They've had this in their back pocket to be released or re-publicized at the appropriate time. The appropriate time being whenever DJT receives a second of positive media pub.

            North Korea summit happens - cue "Trump's Dirty Foundation" two days later. They've got plenty more where that came from. If I were Trump I would identify the biggest offenders of those using the "free press" for political manipulation and hire a private detective to have them trailed releasing every single stinking thing they've ever done that could be construed as wrong or embarrassing. Send it all to the National Enquirer. Eventually they would get the hint.

            I bet this district attorney in NYC would have a s-load. Half of the people you investigate would be committing an affair... some with the same sex. You just blast that info out into the mainstream and ruin their lives. Hell, he could tweet about it for all I care. People would begin to really fear a Trump Tweet.

            Here's an example from a recent Trump Tweet (my addition is in blue):

            "The sleazy New York Democrats, and their now disgraced (and run out of town) A.G. Eric Schneiderman, are doing everything they can to sue me on a foundation that took in $18,800,000 and gave out to charity more money than it took in, $19,200,000. I won’t settle this case!..." P.S. How's that new boyfriend working out for you Eric? Does the Mrs. know?...


            T


            ...:cool:

            Comment


            • Just had a mild disagreement with a leftist who does not think that the economy is stronger

              Comment


              • Originally posted by pinstripers View Post
                Just had a mild disagreement with a leftist who does not think that the economy is stronger
                BispNUMCUAAEhlL.jpg

                "You Just Want to Slap The #### Outta Some People"

                Comment


                • Originally posted by pinstripers View Post
                  Just had a mild disagreement with a leftist who does not think that the economy is stronger
                  Good Lord, it's indisputable.
                  Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by pinstripers View Post
                    Just had a mild disagreement with a leftist who does not think that the economy is stronger
                    Maybe he/she meant it's not stronger for illegal aliens?


                    T


                    ...:cool:

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by pinstripers View Post
                      Just had a mild disagreement with a leftist who does not think that the economy is stronger
                      Did you also ask them if the Earth was flat and the moon landing a hoax?

                      One can disagree on the origin or nexus (or, unfortunately, potential upcoming bubbles) of the economic trend-lines, but to argue it is not doing well at this snapshot in time is basically akin the to above.

                      Tell them to put on their tin foil dunce hat and go sit in the corner.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by SHOCKvalue View Post

                        Did you also ask them if the Earth was flat and the moon landing a hoax?

                        One can disagree on the origin or nexus (or, unfortunately, potential upcoming bubbles) of the economic trend-lines, but to argue it is not doing well at this snapshot in time is basically akin the to above.

                        Tell them to put on their tin foil dunce hat and go sit in the corner.
                        Speaking of "tin foil"...

                        "You Just Want to Slap The #### Outta Some People"

                        Comment


                        • Asked if that meant Democrats would not support a bill backed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell(R-Ky.) to keep immigrant families together while seeking asylum on the U.S. border, Schumer said they want to keep the focus on Trump.

                          Comment


                          • shockfan89_
                            shockfan89_ commented
                            Editing a comment
                            Shocker huh? Everyone knew this was story was fake from the beginning when it was proven that the initial pictures actually came from Obama's time in office. The Democrats need a distraction from the IG report since it proves there can be no obstruction of justice and Comey was fired for cause. They also need a campaign issue for the mid-terms since the blue wave seems to be more of a ripple.
                        Working...
                        X