If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Coach A: "Come with us and you're going to be playing with a winner. We're going to make you a winner. You're going to have an opportunity to work hard and earn a lot of playing time from that hard work. We're going to help you develop your body and your mind. If that's what you want, then come play ball with us".
Coach B: "We need you. You can lead our team and we can build a team around you. We want you playing for us. You're going to be a star".
Obviously, I just made that up to show the difference between a "low key" approach and a "hard sell" approach. After hearing those types of comments for months with daily contacts, what do you think the attitude of the players who sign with each coach would be when they hit campus? Which approach do you think fits Marshall better?
It's not absolutely necessary to get all the recruiting done in the fall, but it's everybody's first choice, especially the coaching staff.
Obviously it is not everybody's first choice or there would be no players available to sign after November 1st. Many players, especially the upper echelon, whose choice is after all the most important one in the equation prefer to wait until the Spring or even Summer and this appears to be a growing trend. Many of these are wanting to wait so they can evaluate the lay of the land with possible player movement among the better programs. For example, what's it looking like for Landry Shamet and Markis McDuffie at Wichita State? This can have a major influence on player choices.
The more you play in the 4 and 5 star pool the more you will be faced with this situation.
I do agree that probably all fans and most coaches wish it was over by the November signing period. But that is just not the world we are living in at this point.
If the kid really wants to commit but still take 2 official visits after that, those schools should cancel. No way is Marshall going to host a kid that has already committed.
So if that's how Nolley wants to play it, that's further proof of his flakiness. Let Underwood deal with him.
If the kid really wants to commit but still take 2 official visits after that, those schools should cancel. No way is Marshall going to host a kid that has already committed.
So if that's how Nolley wants to play it, that's further proof of his flakiness. Let Underwood deal with him.
If the kid really wants to commit but still take 2 official visits after that, those schools should cancel. No way is Marshall going to host a kid that has already committed.
So if that's how Nolley wants to play it, that's further proof of his flakiness. Let Underwood deal with him.
I don't think the kid is a flake. I just think the writer doesn't know what the hell he is talking about. Not only would Marshall not like a kid committing and then taking a visit to his program, but Underwood would hate it. As we all know, committing is the unofficial way of telling other schools to back off (even though some still pursue until the recruit signs on the dotted line). Taking visits after committing is not how this stuff works.
So I would put that idiotic comment on the writer, not Landers.
Comment