lilshock, I don't think they can't do that for players that haven't signed yet.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Marshall show questions
Collapse
X
-
If a player hasn't signed I don't believe that they can announce that they're here. Now, they can focus the camera on them at some point and those educated enough in recruiting and who pay attention to who's visiting when could give them a wonderful welcoming :DInfinity Art Glass - Fantastic local artist and Shocker fan
RIP Guy Always A Shocker
Carpenter Place - A blessing to many young girls/women
ICT S.O.S - Great local cause fighting against human trafficking
Wartick Insurance Agency - Saved me money with more coverage.
Save Shocker Sports - A rallying cry
Comment
-
Coach as always said some funny and interesting things. Nothing too much of a surprise but interesting to see his emphasis.
HCGM amply praised how hard JT Durley was working, at practice, in the game, and in the classroom. All that was great to hear. :clap:
Coach said one assistant remarked to him that playing against Ramon would make for "a long, miserable night." :whistle:
Coach said if people have trouble standing until the Shockers allow a bucket maybe they could do jumping jacks or other conditioning to prepare. :lol:
One worrying thing was the trainer apparantly told HCGM that turf toe never really goes away--that AE might have to deal with it for a long time or even his whole life. Can this really be so? That was very surprising for me. Still coach seemed to think AE could play soon and it would mostly depend on how comfortable he felt playing with pain. Coach also said he thought of AE as one of the best 4 or 5 on the team and he just has to work at finding him minutes since his natural position is at a 4 behind Ramon.
Marshall said he was interesting in redshirting Felter but that it would depend on one or both of AE and MG being ready for the start of the season. He also said redshirting has to be a two-way street (as poasters on here recently suggested).
Marshall said he likes to have a 9 or 10 men seeing playing time in a game. That made his earlier comment about an 8 or 9 man rotation seem kind of off the cuff.Shocker Nation, NYC
Comment
-
"Marshall said he likes to have a 9 or 10 men seeing playing time in a game. That made his earlier comment about an 8 or 9 man rotation seem kind of off the cuff."
I like the sound of this. I would love to see at least 9, possibly 10 get action in most games.
Comment
-
Originally posted by owencOriginally posted by martymooseEither myself or one of my friends ask a question involving KU and his response was he couldn't see KU ever scheduling us under any conditions. Apparently he had tried to put together deals with them on a couple different occasions but Self essentially said it will never happen. Of course at that time Self was a little bit on the hot seat and WSU was flying high.
Chris
Comment
-
Turg and Schaus decided together that it would be policy only to play home and home, whether that be KU or anyone else.Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. Winston Churchill
Comment
-
Originally posted by bloodgoldTurg and Schaus decided together that it would be policy only to play home and home, whether that be KU or anyone else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shocks771Originally posted by bloodgoldTurg and Schaus decided together that it would be policy only to play home and home, whether that be KU or anyone else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ZardozOriginally posted by shocks771Originally posted by bloodgoldTurg and Schaus decided together that it would be policy only to play home and home, whether that be KU or anyone else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by martymooseActually, I think KU put an offer on the table about 10 years ago with Smithson of a 2 for 1 and Smithson turned it down. Smithson wanted 1 for 1.
FWIIW, they had played I think 10 years in a row at that point (or at least 10 out of 11 or something like that).
Chris
Comment
-
Originally posted by owencOriginally posted by martymooseActually, I think KU put an offer on the table about 10 years ago with Smithson of a 2 for 1 and Smithson turned it down. Smithson wanted 1 for 1.
FWIIW, they had played I think 10 years in a row at that point (or at least 10 out of 11 or something like that).
ChrisFollow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/Shox_KCfan
Comment
-
Nebraska plays Creighton.
Iowa State plays Northern Iowa and Drake.
Oklahoma and Oklahoma State play Tulsa.
Texas plays Rice.
Kansas plays ________.
And now they're too chicken for 2 for 1's. Severe, severeeee case of paranoia.Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
- a smart man
Comment
-
Originally posted by newshock1234why was that game in 92 so bad? What made KU say never again?
I think there were three main issues:
1) There was some disagreement over how many tickets KU would get. KU claims they were told one number and then when it came time to deliver WSU only gave them another number that was like 10% of the first number. Problem was that KU had already sold the hell out of the first number to various alums in the Wichita area. That meant they had to go back and basically pick favorites among those that had bought tickets.
2) There was some issue over the the condition of the visitors locker room. I think it may have even been that there was no visitors locker room available for KU. The KU players had to change in the hall or something like that ;-]
3) The student section was sort of out of control. Basically they were being pretty nasty (yelling personal things and stuff like that) and then things got heated and stuff was thrown at KU players. I think part of this was because they thought KU had run up the score (KU won by 30)
Some of this may have just been that Roy Williams was always sort of a whiner but I remember at the time the consensus was that it was sort of out of control and that WSU was messing with KU. I seem to remember the writeup on it being that the KU players didn't feel safe.
KU did return the favor a bit the next year though in Lawrence. Ran up the score even worse (won by 49). This was also a Roy Williams favorite when he was displeased.
Chris
Comment
Comment