If it helps, here's a no call from the same ref: http://gfycat.com/BadMenacingEsok
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oklahoma State ***OFFICIAL*** Game Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jdshock View PostIf it helps, here's a no call from the same ref: http://gfycat.com/BadMenacingEsokFINAL FOURS:
1965, 2013
NCAA Tournament:
1964, 1965, 1976, 1981, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2006, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021
NIT Champs - 1 (2011)
AP Poll History of Wichita St:
Number of Times Ranked: 157
Number of Times Ranked #1: 1
Number of Times Top 5: 32 (Most Recent - 2017)
Number of Times Top 10: 73 (Most Recent - 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017)
Highest Recent AP Ranking:
#3 - Dec. 2017
#2 ~ March 2014
Highest Recent Coaches Poll Ranking:
#2 ~ March 2014
Finished 2013 Season #4
Comment
-
Originally posted by jdshock View PostIf it helps, here's a no call from the same ref: http://gfycat.com/BadMenacingEsok"You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockdaWorld View PostOver and over, frame by frame, and no movement out of Shaq. Arms stayed straight up even after Forte jumped into him and bounced off. Not the reason we lost by a long shot, but certainly a bad call.
Unless of course I am misinterpreting the rule and Shaq is NOT legally allowed to stand straight up with his hands extended straight over his head inside the arc. And if that's the case, he may as well lean into the little turds that come flying into him. May as well make them think twice about the next one if you're going to get a call anyway.
An “interpretation” means that the committee is clarifying a previous rule that might not have been clear. In this instance, the interpretation concerns the restricted arc. Under the previous rules, a defender inside the restricted arc could not take a charge and any contact with an offensive player would result in a blocking foul being called.
Now, so long as the defender maintains verticality (meaning he jumps straight up and holds his arms straight up in an attempt to block a shot), that defender will not be called for a blocking foul even if he is inside the restricted area. This interpretation effectively prevents an offensive player from picking up a cheap foul by leaning into a shot blocker who leapt from inside the restricted arc. But a defender who remains grounded is still subject to the rules concerning the restricted arc. So, too, is a defender who leaps out toward an offensive player, or who extends his arms parallel to the floor (Note: if you’re a stickler for the rulebook, this kind of play is also a blocking foul if the defender is outside the restricted arc).
"I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
---------------------------------------
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
"We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".
A physician called into a radio show and said:
"That's the definition of a stool sample."
Comment
-
Originally posted by im4wsu View PostFrom teamspeedkills.com, it appears that the secondary defender must not have any foot on the ground inside the arc. This is also what I recalled from the explanatory video given earlier in the season"You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."
Comment
-
Originally posted by jdshock View PostI slowed it down all the way, and it looks to me like his arms don't budge until the guy barrels into him. I do think that might be what got the foul called, though.
But whatever. We sucked on Saturday.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockdaWorld View PostSo everything was correct. Standing inside the arc is grounds for a blocking foul regardless of how vertical you are and how long you've been there. Better off to jump straight up and if they happen to hit the floor, oops.ShockerNet is a rat infested cess pool.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Keyser Soze View PostDude, c'mon. I know blaming the refs is basically a sport, but that wasn't even close to a charge. It was crazy how slowly Shaq responded to help. He didn't come within 3 feet of clearing the block/charge line.Last edited by proshox; December 19, 2016, 07:38 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SHOCKvalue View PostAAC's not going to make a decision based on a sample size of one game. Good grief.
"We can only hope that the AAC Heads, their school AD’s, and coaches are intelligent enough to understand that one game in a rebuilding year does not take precedence over the outstanding record WSU and Coach Marshall have built over the last 10 years or so. Unfortunately, there are always soothsayers looking for the slightest flaw and it may only take one or two.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jdshock View PostI think you're both right. I clipped the video: http://gfycat.com/YawningSillyGuineapig
In my opinion, that shouldn't be called a foul, but he's definitely in the arc so it's not a charge.
What else is a guy supposed to do there? Forte could literally draw that same foul every single time if that's how things were to be called. No credit at all to the defensive player and rewarding an out of control drive with a guy flailing his hands in the air to get the bail out.
I HATE that ****. So much referee anticipation there. Garbage call.Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
- a smart man
Comment
-
Shamet was beat the moment Forte touched the ball. If Shamet drops back toward the baseline to cut off the drive, Forte would have shot an open 3. Shamet closed, which cut the 3 off, but then Forte could drive around him. Morris didn't have time to get set outside the arc, and apparently would have been OK if he had jumped straight up, but it's an automatic foul on him if he doesn't. That's just weird and will never be called consistently.The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
Comment
-
Exactly. Shamet did everything right except anticipate Forte could go left thus exposing ShaQ for a **** call. Yes inexperienced Freshman guard used to playing high school ball. He heard about it in practice today.Last edited by AZ Shocker; December 20, 2016, 04:00 AM.FINAL FOURS:
1965, 2013
NCAA Tournament:
1964, 1965, 1976, 1981, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2006, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021
NIT Champs - 1 (2011)
AP Poll History of Wichita St:
Number of Times Ranked: 157
Number of Times Ranked #1: 1
Number of Times Top 5: 32 (Most Recent - 2017)
Number of Times Top 10: 73 (Most Recent - 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017)
Highest Recent AP Ranking:
#3 - Dec. 2017
#2 ~ March 2014
Highest Recent Coaches Poll Ranking:
#2 ~ March 2014
Finished 2013 Season #4
Comment
Comment