Mark Adams is Awesome

[Steeleshocker]

Mark was rolling. I imagine he will be having coffee with his manager in the morning.

I believe he's an independent contractor. Hence how he could do the ESPN games and our semi-final matchup.

[BikeIdiot]

He is on a roll.


Mark Adams @EnthusiAdams 2h2 hours ago
True non-CONF road gms '15
Duke (1)
UK (1)
KU (2)
Nova (1)
Ariz (2)
Syracuse (2)
Notre Dame (0)
UCLA (1)
Ohio St (1)
GTown (0)
Murray St (4)

[Ricardo del Rio]

He is on a roll.


Mark Adams @EnthusiAdams 2h2 hours ago
True non-CONF road gms '15
Duke (1)
UK (1)
KU (2)
Nova (1)
Ariz (2)
Syracuse (2)
Notre Dame (0)
UCLA (1)
Ohio St (1)
GTown (0)
Murray St (4)

I don't know. He is stirring the pot.

[DUShock]

I don't know. He is stirring the pot.

Yes sir, but it needs to be stirred.

[SHOXAAC]

Yes sir, but it needs to be stirred.

Some like it shaken, not stirred. In this case stir away.

[Ricardo del Rio]

I don't follow the details of RPI calculations, so here is a test question.

Which is more desireable for Big Dance seeding purposes?
a. A home win over a team with a 200+ RPI

b. A 3 point, road loss to a team with a 100 or less RPI

Please don't say, "It depends." (Just kidding)

[shockmonster]

I don't follow the details of RPI calculations, so here is a test question.

Which is more desireable for Big Dance seeding purposes?
a. A home win over a team with a 200+ RPI

b. A 3 point, road loss to a team with a 100 or less RPI

Please don't say, "It depends." (Just kidding)

If I hadn't seen who your are, I would have guessed that jh4p posted this question.

[wufan]

Not sure which is better, but I believe you use winning percentage as a multiplier and score is irrelevant.

[Jamar Howard 4 President]

I don't follow the details of RPI calculations, so here is a test question.

Which is more desireable for Big Dance seeding purposes?
a. A home win over a team with a 200+ RPI

b. A 3 point, road loss to a team with a 100 or less RPI

Please don't say, "It depends." (Just kidding)

It depends ;-)

Truthfully, more often than not, the road loss to the top 100 team is better for your RPI than a home win over a 200+ team.

[RoyalShock]

Mark Adams @EnthusiAdams · 3h 3 hours ago
I could fix this overnight. Outlaw all guarantee games and require all home and home games or neutral site games only. Dilemma solved!

This one is surprisingly naive. Want to see the P5 circle the wagons and then close ranks? Implement those rules.

[Ricardo del Rio]

Originally Posted by Ricardo del Rio I don't follow the details of RPI calculations, so here is a test question.

Which is more desireable for Big Dance seeding purposes?
a. A home win over a team with a 200+ RPI

b. A 3 point, road loss to a team with a 100 or less RPI

Please don't say, "It depends." (Just kidding)

If I hadn't seen who your are, I would have guessed that jh4p posted this question.

I was being straight up dumb. I have no idea of the answer to my own question.

[Jamar Howard 4 President]

Why is it "straight up dumb" to ask a question when you don't know the answer? Isn't that was questions are for?

Or are you a lawyer?

[Jamar Howard 4 President]

This one is surprisingly naive. Want to see the P5 circle the wagons and then close ranks? Implement those rules.

Exactly!

[shockmonster]

This one is surprisingly naive. Want to see the P5 circle the wagons and then close ranks? Implement those rules.

Royal- I can't believe that he doesn't know exactly what he's saying. He knows it won't happen and that he is the lone voice in the wilderness. However, it serves a purpose to expose the problem and remind the media and NCAA seeding committee that these problems exist. I think that is why he is saying what he is saying. He's not trying to change the system. He's giving a voice that without him isn't expressed because too many athletic directors and coaches are afraid to become a pariah and won't fight.

[pie n eye]

Royal- I can't believe that he doesn't know exactly what he's saying. He knows it won't happen and that he is the lone voice in the wilderness. However, it serves a purpose to expose the problem and remind the media and NCAA seeding committee that these problems exist. I think that is why he is saying what he is saying. He's not trying to change the system. He's giving a voice that without him isn't expressed because too many athletic directors and coaches are afraid to become a pariah and won't fight.

It's naive to think they haven't already circled the wagons.