2022-23 NOMINATIONS: "Cone of Shame"

[WstateU]

WHICH KID///Hope they meant the one in white....I thought the kid in black showed remarkable restraint.....

Definitely a solid ‘haymaker’...

Trivia time. Does anyone know where the term “haymaker” was derived from? Hint, it’s 'Wheatshocker' related. Ross and I were ‘haymakers’ back in the day… heck, I still do some haymaking today...





I know the suspense is killing everyone...

[Stickboy46]

WHICH KID///Hope they meant the one in white....I thought the kid in black showed remarkable restraint.....

Both of them. No matter how dumb the kid in White is being, you have zero excuses for throwing a punch on the court.

[molly jabali]

WHICH KID///Hope they meant the one in white....I thought the kid in black showed remarkable restraint.....

[Kung Wu]

You mean eyelash. My husband wouldn’t know either. And those were extreme.

Oops, yeah eyelash! Haahaha

[Stickboy46]

[Shocker Mama]

Yeah, she should be suspended because of those eyebrow extensions. Eeesh.

You mean eyelash. My husband wouldn’t know either. And those were extreme.

[RoyalShock]

Yeah, she should be suspended because of those eyebrow extensions. Eeesh.

And for missing someone at most 10 feet away, with a basketball, by more than a foot.

[SubGod22]

Yes. However, the gal that pushed the ball in her face lit the match. She should have dropped the ball or dropped it back towards out of bounds. Absolutely NOT an excuse to throw the ball at anyone. She probably should have gone to her knees like she was hurt. A review would have probably gotten a foul or a T.

Well, that girl did get a T for her part in it. Any time you instigate a T worthy response you should get one as well for lighting that match.

Launching a ball at someone is never a good idea. It's even worse when you miss as badly as she did. All of that is made even worse than it was when you go chasing them down and try to start more ****.

[ShockTalk]

Considering their season is likely over at this point, probably not.

Seems like the officials handled it well enough from what I've read.

It should have been double T's and done with, but you can't go chasing people down and escalating ****.

Yes. However, the gal that pushed the ball in her face lit the match. She should have dropped the ball or dropped it back towards out of bounds. Absolutely NOT an excuse to throw the ball at anyone. She probably should have gone to her knees like she was hurt. A review would have probably gotten a foul or a T.

[WuShock Reaper]

I feel sorry for the 'guy' or 'gal' who marries her... yikes!

Well we now know how her "significant other" will be served their meal when they ask "can you make me a ham sandwich?"

[SubGod22]

The ball launcher should probably face a multi game suspension, but we all know that won't be the case.

Considering their season is likely over at this point, probably not.

Seems like the officials handled it well enough from what I've read.

It should have been double T's and done with, but you can't go chasing people down and escalating ****.

[WstateU]

Yeah, she should be suspended because of those eyebrow extensions. Eeesh.

I feel sorry for the 'guy' or 'gal' who marries her... yikes!

[WstateU]

The ball launcher should probably face a multi game suspension, but we all know that won't be the case.

She did her best impression of Sandy Koufax; a 'smooth' lefty…

[Kung Wu]

The ball launcher should probably face a multi game suspension, but we all know that won't be the case.

Yeah, she should be suspended because of those eyebrow extensions. Eeesh.

[rrshock]

The ball launcher should probably face a multi game suspension, but we all know that won't be the case.