Our NET jumped 5 spots from 46 to 41.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2019-20 Bracketology
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ShockerPrez View PostI'm still optimistic that one win gets us at least a first 4 bid. 2 wins and we are in.
- Likes 7
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuDrWu View Post
I'm sorry but you lose all credibility when you have a team on your own cut line (Texas) who gets obliterated by a lesser team on it's own floor in the last game of the season, for no reason, and it doesn't move the needle. Not saying WSU has to be in before them, but someone else is worthy that won. Having Texas in is nothing but big name bias and over valuing a few games that you intentionally want to over value.-Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind-
GO SHOX!
Comment
-
Just a quick look at Lunardi's bracket.
All teams that have a worse net than us that he has in
Stanford. 30 NET
Rutger 32 NET
LSU 29 NET
Indiana
Texas
UCLA
NCSt
ASU
OU
Cincy (i can forgive this since we are 0-2)
He also has Texas Tech. 22 NET, 73 RPI, 7-13 Q1/Q2 record, and a 192 non-con SOS that they went 9-4 in.Last edited by Kashman; March 9, 2020, 06:37 PM.
Comment
-
The only thing I'm going to look at from the mothership's bracketology are the 23 teams for 13 spots. Only crazy bid stealers are SF and Wofford. If Gonzaga and ETSU can win, we should be ok with the 13.
That will leave us with NCState, Texas Tech, OU, Texas, Providence, Marquette, Xavier, Rutgers, Indiana, Purdue, USC, Stanford, Arizona State, UCLA, Miss State, Arkansas, WSU, Cincy, Memphis, ETSU, Richmond, SFA and UNI.
Personally I think we're no worse than 11 on that list, but I know I'm biased.
I can't believe 24 wins in this conference can't get you in. All the bubble teams have flaws. Get to the finals and regardless, logistically I believe WSU is in.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dan View PostOur NET jumped 5 spots from 46 to 41.
NET: 41 (11 seed)
KenPom: 39 (10 seed)
BPI: 40 (10 seed)
Sagarin: 32 (8 seed)
KPI: (8 seed)
Strength of Record: 33 (9 seed)
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by FlyingWheat View Post
The problem with only winning one is that it means losing a third time to Cinci. I can’t see us getting in if that’s the case. Unfortunately, I think we have to win two."When life hands you lemons, make lemonade." Better have some sugar and water too, or else your lemonade will suck!
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuDrWu View Post
I'm sorry but you lose all credibility when you have a team on your own cut line (Texas) who gets obliterated by a lesser team on it's own floor in the last game of the season, for no reason, and it doesn't move the needle. Not saying WSU has to be in before them, but someone else is worthy that won. Having Texas in is nothing but big name bias and over valuing a few games that you intentionally want to over value.
Just wait till next Sunday.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuShock16 View PostPalm must have changed his bracket again this morning because I’m seeing Cincy fully in Round of 64 and WSU playing Richmond in the First 4.
Comment
Comment