The AAC will be its own biggest enemy if it cannot figure out how to get the bottom of the conference to greatly improve. So, some of that talk is partially right. Those bottom dwellers are a drag on the conference to being elite and able to recruit to the level of most of the P5 and Big East as a conference.
This year, the AAC was very close to the Big Ten and Pac-12 in conference rating. The Big Ten had only one team barely worse than 200 RPI, but had 4 more teams between 150-200. The Pac-12 was better having only 1 team just below 200 and only 1 between 150-200. While the AAC only had 3 teams lower than 150, 2 of them below 270 was a killer. Bringing those teams up and it improves everyone which means more bids.
The more bids a conference can usually expect, the better the recruiting. This league certainly has teams that can be very capable on a regular basis besides the 3 dancing this year -- Memphis, UConn, Temple with SMU and Tulsa close behind. UCF, sans injuries was right in the mix. No reason South Florida, Tulane, and ECU can't do that to.
This year, the AAC was very close to the Big Ten and Pac-12 in conference rating. The Big Ten had only one team barely worse than 200 RPI, but had 4 more teams between 150-200. The Pac-12 was better having only 1 team just below 200 and only 1 between 150-200. While the AAC only had 3 teams lower than 150, 2 of them below 270 was a killer. Bringing those teams up and it improves everyone which means more bids.
The more bids a conference can usually expect, the better the recruiting. This league certainly has teams that can be very capable on a regular basis besides the 3 dancing this year -- Memphis, UConn, Temple with SMU and Tulsa close behind. UCF, sans injuries was right in the mix. No reason South Florida, Tulane, and ECU can't do that to.
Comment