Oh, are you? game thread

[SekShocker]

Re: Huh?

Kenny Powers?

You need to watch East Bound and Down on HBO.

Kenny Powers cracks me up

I wish I had an assistant like Stevie Janowski!!!!!!!

If at first you don't succeed, than maybe you just suck -- Kenny Powers

[SubGod22]

Re: Huh?

Kenny Powers?

You need to watch East Bound and Down on HBO.

Kenny Powers cracks me up

I wish I had an assistant like Stevie Janowski!!!!!!!

Don't we all!!!

If at first you don't succeed, than maybe you just suck -- Kenny Powers

He's got some good ones

[shockfan89_]

While I will agree pitching seems to be our strong point (our pitching coach is our recruiting coodinator, maybe we should revisit that), if you look at our post season play over the past 3 years it has been our hitting that has carried us with the exception of the Super Regional versus UC Irvine.

                     Hits        Avg R   Hits   Hits  Runs   Given 
                     per        scored  given  given  given  up per
Year   Games   Hits  game  Avg.   game    up    up/G   up    game
2006    4      51   12.75  .352   8.25    46    11.5   28     7.0
2007    7      74   10.57  .303   4.71    51    7.23   21     3.0
2008    6      62   10.33  .291   6.33    75    12.5   47     7.83

Of the 17 games played:
14 were against teams ranked #24 or higher
12 were against teams ranked #13 or higher
7 were against teams ranked #5 or higher


Aren't these the games that really matter? If pitching is our strength why doesn't that show in the post season #s? With the exception of 2007 we are giving up 12 hits per game and over 7 runs per game? If our hitting is so weak why do these numbers against the TOP COMPETITION IN THE COUNTRY look so good? We are averaging 11 hits per game against the top teams in the nation???

[GoShockers89]

Like I said before, I am fully aware that no changes at hitting coach will be made in the short term...but the defenses of JT in this thread borderline on laughable.

Here's to a weekend ahead of 5-3, 2-1, and 4-3 wins!!

[William]

Ok, here's the deal, if you think that the offenses of the 2000's are on par with the offenses of the 1990's when the shockers were a legit team on the national scene, then more power to ya but I couldn't dissagree more.

[t7017s]

Nobody is saying that the 2000s hitting has been on par with the 90s. But you have to realize that we haven't had the 90s talent thus far in the 2000s. Its all about perspective and those of you who want to throw JT or Gene under the bus because we haven't been to Omaha just don't have any comprehension of what we have in them. No appreciation whatsoever for the amazing program they maintain. Look I'm all for giving kudos to the best pitching coach in the country in Brent, but pitching alone has not held this program where its at. A perennial top 15 program in the country is nothing to be ashamed of guys. Christ we are having a down year and are running 7 new guys onto the field every game. Its freaking baseball and you just cant win them all. This is not football where you get 12 freaking games a year and any loss could kill your season. Some of you just don't have any rational perspective to the state of this program. Bash Gene and JT all you want but one of these days when they aren't here you will sure as hell wish they were. I assure you. You can't just replace guys like them. They are not a dime a dozen. Funny how Gene has built this monster that can't be fed. Meanwhile over on the basketball court there are 10k people that would kill and maim just to have a team with half the consistency, success, facilities, reputation, talent, accolades, etc. Some of you just need to back up and take a look at the big picture sometimes instead of throwing childish fits when we lose a game. I guarantee nobody would want to can Dean Smith if he was our basketball coach. That would be the equivalent. Think about that... Seriously though! Think about that and have a little appreciation for what we have and will continue to have as long as this staff is around.

[SekShocker]

Nobody is saying that the 2000s hitting has been on par with the 90s. But you have to realize that we haven't had the 90s talent thus far in the 2000s. Its all about perspective and those of you who want to throw JT or Gene under the bus because we haven't been to Omaha just don't have any comprehension of what we have in them. No appreciation whatsoever for the amazing program they maintain. Look I'm all for giving kudos to the best pitching coach in the country in Brent, but pitching alone has not held this program where its at. A perennial top 15 program in the country is nothing to be ashamed of guys. Christ we are having a down year and are running 7 new guys onto the field every game. Its freaking baseball and you just cant win them all. This is not football where you get 12 freaking games a year and any loss could kill your season. Some of you just don't have any rational perspective to the state of this program. Bash Gene and JT all you want but one of these days when they aren't here you will sure as hell wish they were. I assure you. You can't just replace guys like them. They are not a dime a dozen. Funny how Gene has built this monster that can't be fed. Meanwhile over on the basketball court there are 10k people that would kill and maim just to have a team with half the consistency, success, facilities, reputation, talent, accolades, etc. Some of you just need to back up and take a look at the big picture sometimes instead of throwing childish fits when we lose a game. I guarantee nobody would want to can Dean Smith if he was our basketball coach. That would be the equivalent. Think about that... Seriously though! Think about that and have a little appreciation for what we have and will continue to have as long as this staff is around.

AMEN!!!!!!!!!! What a great post, seems like you or somebody has to make one of these every year after we have lost a few games.

Another thing, and it might be minor, but having played baseball it might not be either, is the bats, the difference in the way the ball flies of the bats today as compared to what they did before they regulated them to -3's is huge. Those old bats were like rocket launchers.

[SekShocker]

Re: Huh?

Kenny Powers?

You need to watch East Bound and Down on HBO.

Kenny Powers cracks me up

I wish I had an assistant like Stevie Janowski!!!!!!!

Don't we all!!!

If at first you don't succeed, than maybe you just suck -- Kenny Powers

He's got some good ones

Most of them you can't post on here, but they are good!!!!!!

[SHOCKvalue]

Paragraph breaks are AWESOME!

[ShockTalk]

t7017s and SekShocker -- 1) I'm very proud of my alma mater's baseball program, in the past and now!

2) My statements on what I believe is downward trend of our offense is not based on this year alone, but that this year is somewhat a product of what has gone on since 2000. Yes, this team's position players are very young and they may very well turn out great. I hope so.

3) WSU baseball has a prestigious standing. However, being in the MVC, WSU does not have the advantage of a prestigious conference to help it recruit when times are not as good (pre-2000). KU and KSt were once our doormats ... no longer. I don't even want to think of our record against ORU. To keep our standing in the college baseball world, we will have to do a better job finding or producing a better offense. I want, and will leave, the "how to get there" to Gene.

4) Yes, changes have been made to the bats. However, it's odd that the average run production in college baseball has remained fairly level over the last 30 years. The average run production in college baseball from 2003-2007 is the same as it was from 1989-1995. It spiked in the late 90s, but it also spiked in the mid to late 80s.

5) Funny how success does breed a monster. And, oh, how much its fans want that monster to stay around. And Dean Smith's offensive production didn't slip for 7 straight years to a level that would have been considered sub-par the previous 20.

:wsu_posters:

[William]

t7017s and SekShocker -- 1) I'm very proud of my alma mater's baseball program, in the past and now!

2) My statements on what I believe is downward trend of our offense is not based on this year alone, but that this year is somewhat a product of what has gone on since 2000. Yes, this team's position players are very young and they may very well turn out great. I hope so.

3) WSU baseball has a prestigious standing. However, being in the MVC, WSU does not have the advantage of a prestigious conference to help it recruit when times are not as good (pre-2000). KU and KSt were once our doormats ... no longer. I don't even want to think of our record against ORU. To keep our standing in the college baseball world, we will have to do a better job finding or producing a better offense. I want, and will leave, the "how to get there" to Gene.

4) Yes, changes have been made to the bats. However, it's odd that the average run production in college baseball has remained fairly level over the last 30 years. The average run production in college baseball from 2003-2007 is the same as it was from 1989-1995. It spiked in the late 90s, but it also spiked in the mid to late 80s.

5) Funny how success does breed a monster. And, oh, how much its fans want that monster to stay around. And Dean Smith's offensive production didn't slip for 7 straight years to a level that would have been considered sub-par the previous 20.

:wsu_posters:

awesome post, it's sad that every time somebody spills a little truth around here, somebody has to cry blasphemy from the mountaintops.

[t7017s]

t7017s and SekShocker -- 1) I'm very proud of my alma mater's baseball program, in the past and now!

2) My statements on what I believe is downward trend of our offense is not based on this year alone, but that this year is somewhat a product of what has gone on since 2000. Yes, this team's position players are very young and they may very well turn out great. I hope so.

3) WSU baseball has a prestigious standing. However, being in the MVC, WSU does not have the advantage of a prestigious conference to help it recruit when times are not as good (pre-2000). KU and KSt were once our doormats ... no longer. I don't even want to think of our record against ORU. To keep our standing in the college baseball world, we will have to do a better job finding or producing a better offense. I want, and will leave, the "how to get there" to Gene.

4) Yes, changes have been made to the bats. However, it's odd that the average run production in college baseball has remained fairly level over the last 30 years. The average run production in college baseball from 2003-2007 is the same as it was from 1989-1995. It spiked in the late 90s, but it also spiked in the mid to late 80s.

5) Funny how success does breed a monster. And, oh, how much its fans want that monster to stay around. And Dean Smith's offensive production didn't slip for 7 straight years to a level that would have been considered sub-par the previous 20.

:wsu_posters:

Really...

1961–62 8-9 7-7 ACC tournament first round
1962–63 15-6 10-4 ACC tournament semifinal
1963–64 12-12 6-8 ACC tournament semifinal
1964–65 15-9 10-4 ACC tournament first round
1965–66 ACC tournament semifinal
1966–67 26-6 12-2 NCAA Final Four
1967–68 28-4 12-2 NCAA runner-up
1968–69 27-5 12-2 NCAA Final Four
1969–70 18-9 9-5 NIT first round
1970–71 26-6 11-3 NIT champion
1971–72 26-5 9-3 NCAA Final Four
1972–73 25-8 8-4 NIT semifinal
1973–74 22-6 9-3 NIT first round
1974–75 23-8 8-4 NCAA Sweet 16
1975–76 25-4 11-1 NCAA first round
1976–77 28-5 9-3 NCAA runner-up
1977–78 23-8 9-3 NCAA first round
1978–79 23-6 9-3 NCAA first round
1979–80 21-8 9-5 NCAA first round
1980–81 29-8 10-4 NCAA runner-up
1981–82 32-2 12-2 NCAA champion
1982–83 28-8 12-2 NCAA Elite Eight
1983–84 28-3 14-0 NCAA Sweet 16
1984–85 27-9 9-5 NCAA Elite Eight
1985–86 28-6 10-4 NCAA Sweet 16
1986–87 32-4 14-0 NCAA Elite Eight
1987–88 27-7 11-3 NCAA Elite Eight
1988–89 29-8 9-5 NCAA Sweet 16
1989–90 21-13 8-6 NCAA Sweet 16
1990–91 29-6 10-4 NCAA Final Four
1991–92 23-10 9-7 NCAA Sweet 16
1992–93 34-4 14-2 NCAA champion
1993–94 28-7 11-5 NCAA second round
1994–95 28-6 12-4 NCAA Final Four
1995–96 21-11 10-6 NCAA second round
1996–97 28-7 11-5 NCAA Final Four
All seasons 879-254 364-136
Source: Sports Illustrated (1997)[42] and Detroit News.[43]

Hmmm...

1978 43 30 1 .588 Gene Stephenson
1979 65 15 .813 10 2 * Gene Stephenson
1980 53 12 1 .803 7 1 * Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament champion
NCAA Midwest Regional
1981 56 15 .789 15 1 1st (West) Gene Stephenson NCAA Atlantic Regional
1982 73 14 .839 15 1 1st (West) Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament champion
NCAA South Regional champion
College World Series (2nd place)
1983 55 18 .753 7 1 1st (West) Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest Regional
1984 40 22 .645 7 7 4th Gene Stephenson
1985 68 20 .773 15 5 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament champion
NCAA Midwest Regional
1986 45 18 .715 12 8 2nd Gene Stephenson
1987 59 20 .747 13 7 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament champion
NCAA West I Regional
1988 56 16 1 .778 16 4 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Midwest Reg. champion;
College World Series (3rd place)
1989 68 16 .810 13 5 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA West II Reg. champion
College World Series champion
1990 45 19 .703 14 6 t1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest Regional
1991 66 13 .835 21 3 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Midwest Reg. champion;
College World Series (2nd place)
1992 56 11 .836 18 3 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Midwest Reg. champion;
College World Series (0-2)
1993 58 17 .773 17 3 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Atlantic Reg. champion;
College World Series (2nd place)
1994 45 17 .734 19 2 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest II Regional (0-2)
1995 53 17 .757 24 8 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest I Regional (1-2)
1996 54 11 .831 24 4 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest Reg. Champion; CWS (0-2)
1997 51 18 .739 21 7 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA South II Regional (0-2)
1998 56 7 .889 26 1 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest Regional (1-2)
1999 59 14 .808 24 7 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Wichita Regional (2-2)
2000 44 21 .677 24 8 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament Champion; NCAA Minn. Reg. (2-2)
2001 42 24 .636 21 11 2nd Gene Stephenson
2002 47 17 .734 23 9 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament champion; NCAA Wichita Reg. (1-2)
2003 49 27 .645 19 13 2nd Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Houston Reg. (2-2)
2004 49 16 .754 28 4 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Fayetteville Reg. (2-2)
2005 51 24 .680 16 8 2nd Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Knoxville Reg. (2-2)
2006 46 22 .676 15 9 3rd Gene Stephenson NCAA Norman Regional (2-2)
2007 53 22 .707 20 4 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Wichita Regional (4-1); NCAA Wichita Super Regional (0-2)
2008 48 17 .738 19 5 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Stillwater Regional (3-0); NCAA Tallahassee Super Regional (1-2)

[William]

t7017s and SekShocker -- 1) I'm very proud of my alma mater's baseball program, in the past and now!

2) My statements on what I believe is downward trend of our offense is not based on this year alone, but that this year is somewhat a product of what has gone on since 2000. Yes, this team's position players are very young and they may very well turn out great. I hope so.

3) WSU baseball has a prestigious standing. However, being in the MVC, WSU does not have the advantage of a prestigious conference to help it recruit when times are not as good (pre-2000). KU and KSt were once our doormats ... no longer. I don't even want to think of our record against ORU. To keep our standing in the college baseball world, we will have to do a better job finding or producing a better offense. I want, and will leave, the "how to get there" to Gene.

4) Yes, changes have been made to the bats. However, it's odd that the average run production in college baseball has remained fairly level over the last 30 years. The average run production in college baseball from 2003-2007 is the same as it was from 1989-1995. It spiked in the late 90s, but it also spiked in the mid to late 80s.

5) Funny how success does breed a monster. And, oh, how much its fans want that monster to stay around. And Dean Smith's offensive production didn't slip for 7 straight years to a level that would have been considered sub-par the previous 20.

:wsu_posters:

Really...

1961–62 8-9 7-7 ACC tournament first round
1962–63 15-6 10-4 ACC tournament semifinal
1963–64 12-12 6-8 ACC tournament semifinal
1964–65 15-9 10-4 ACC tournament first round
1965–66 ACC tournament semifinal
1966–67 26-6 12-2 NCAA Final Four
1967–68 28-4 12-2 NCAA runner-up
1968–69 27-5 12-2 NCAA Final Four
1969–70 18-9 9-5 NIT first round
1970–71 26-6 11-3 NIT champion
1971–72 26-5 9-3 NCAA Final Four
1972–73 25-8 8-4 NIT semifinal
1973–74 22-6 9-3 NIT first round
1974–75 23-8 8-4 NCAA Sweet 16
1975–76 25-4 11-1 NCAA first round
1976–77 28-5 9-3 NCAA runner-up
1977–78 23-8 9-3 NCAA first round
1978–79 23-6 9-3 NCAA first round
1979–80 21-8 9-5 NCAA first round
1980–81 29-8 10-4 NCAA runner-up
1981–82 32-2 12-2 NCAA champion
1982–83 28-8 12-2 NCAA Elite Eight
1983–84 28-3 14-0 NCAA Sweet 16
1984–85 27-9 9-5 NCAA Elite Eight
1985–86 28-6 10-4 NCAA Sweet 16
1986–87 32-4 14-0 NCAA Elite Eight
1987–88 27-7 11-3 NCAA Elite Eight
1988–89 29-8 9-5 NCAA Sweet 16
1989–90 21-13 8-6 NCAA Sweet 16
1990–91 29-6 10-4 NCAA Final Four
1991–92 23-10 9-7 NCAA Sweet 16
1992–93 34-4 14-2 NCAA champion
1993–94 28-7 11-5 NCAA second round
1994–95 28-6 12-4 NCAA Final Four
1995–96 21-11 10-6 NCAA second round
1996–97 28-7 11-5 NCAA Final Four
All seasons 879-254 364-136
Source: Sports Illustrated (1997)[42] and Detroit News.[43]

Hmmm...

1978 43 30 1 .588 Gene Stephenson
1979 65 15 .813 10 2 * Gene Stephenson
1980 53 12 1 .803 7 1 * Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament champion
NCAA Midwest Regional
1981 56 15 .789 15 1 1st (West) Gene Stephenson NCAA Atlantic Regional
1982 73 14 .839 15 1 1st (West) Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament champion
NCAA South Regional champion
College World Series (2nd place)
1983 55 18 .753 7 1 1st (West) Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest Regional
1984 40 22 .645 7 7 4th Gene Stephenson
1985 68 20 .773 15 5 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament champion
NCAA Midwest Regional
1986 45 18 .715 12 8 2nd Gene Stephenson
1987 59 20 .747 13 7 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament champion
NCAA West I Regional
1988 56 16 1 .778 16 4 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Midwest Reg. champion;
College World Series (3rd place)
1989 68 16 .810 13 5 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA West II Reg. champion
College World Series champion
1990 45 19 .703 14 6 t1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest Regional
1991 66 13 .835 21 3 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Midwest Reg. champion;
College World Series (2nd place)
1992 56 11 .836 18 3 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Midwest Reg. champion;
College World Series (0-2)
1993 58 17 .773 17 3 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Atlantic Reg. champion;
College World Series (2nd place)
1994 45 17 .734 19 2 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest II Regional (0-2)
1995 53 17 .757 24 8 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest I Regional (1-2)
1996 54 11 .831 24 4 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest Reg. Champion; CWS (0-2)
1997 51 18 .739 21 7 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA South II Regional (0-2)
1998 56 7 .889 26 1 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Midwest Regional (1-2)
1999 59 14 .808 24 7 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Wichita Regional (2-2)
2000 44 21 .677 24 8 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament Champion; NCAA Minn. Reg. (2-2)
2001 42 24 .636 21 11 2nd Gene Stephenson
2002 47 17 .734 23 9 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tournament champion; NCAA Wichita Reg. (1-2)
2003 49 27 .645 19 13 2nd Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Houston Reg. (2-2)
2004 49 16 .754 28 4 1st Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Fayetteville Reg. (2-2)
2005 51 24 .680 16 8 2nd Gene Stephenson MVC Tourn. champion; NCAA Knoxville Reg. (2-2)
2006 46 22 .676 15 9 3rd Gene Stephenson NCAA Norman Regional (2-2)
2007 53 22 .707 20 4 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Wichita Regional (4-1); NCAA Wichita Super Regional (0-2)
2008 48 17 .738 19 5 1st Gene Stephenson NCAA Stillwater Regional (3-0); NCAA Tallahassee Super Regional (1-2)

Very nice comparison, I see first you list the accomplishments of an apple, and then contrast with the accomplishments of an orange. Well done.

[ShockTalk]

t7017s -- You're kidding, right? Just what are you trying to tell me here?

Eight straight appearences to either the S16 or E8 was sub-par to his previous record? Just within the 5 years previous to your "red" years, includes 3 bounces out in the first round, a runner-up, and a championship.

Can we not agree that making it to the E8 in basketball is equal to making the CWS?

And I'm not talking about post-season appearances.

By the way, how's our offense doing today against lowly Bradley?

[t7017s]

How about we compare to Joe Paterno...

Year Team Overall Conference Standing Bowl Coaches# AP°
Penn State Nittany Lions (Independent) (1966–1992)
1966 Penn State 5–5–0
1967 Penn State 8–2–1 T 17–17 Gator 11 10
1968 Penn State 11–0–0 W 15–14 Orange 3 2
1969 Penn State 11–0–0 W 10–3 Orange 2 2
1970 Penn State 7–3–0 19 18
1971 Penn State 11–1–0 W 30–6 Cotton 11 5
1972 Penn State 9–3–0 L 0–14 Sugar 8 10
1973 Penn State 12–0–0 W 16–9 Orange 5 5
1974 Penn State 10–2–0 W 41–20 Cotton 7 7
1975 Penn State 9–3–0 L 6–13 Sugar 10 10
1976 Penn State 7–5–0 L 9–20 Gator
1977 Penn State 11–1–0 W 42–30 Fiesta 4 5
1978 Penn State 11–1–0 L 7–14 Sugar 4 4
1979 Penn State 8–4–0 W 9–6 Liberty 18 20
1980 Penn State 10–2–0 W 31–19 Fiesta 8 8
1981 Penn State 10–2–0 W 26–10 Fiesta 3 3
1982 Penn State 11–1–0 W 27–23 Sugar 1 1
1983 Penn State 8–4–1 W 13–10 Aloha 17
1984 Penn State 6–5–0
1985 Penn State 11–1–0 L 10–25 Orange 3 3
1986 Penn State 12–0–0 W 14–10 Fiesta 1 1
1987 Penn State 8–4–0 L 10–35 Citrus
1988 Penn State 5–6–0
1989 Penn State 8–3–1 W 50–39 Holiday 14 15
1990 Penn State 9–3–0 L 17–24 Blockbuster 10 11
1991 Penn State 11–2–0 W 42–17 Fiesta 3 3
1992 Penn State 7–5–0 L 3–24 Blockbuster 24
Penn State Nittany Lions (Big Ten Conference) (1993–present)
1993 Penn State 10–2–0 6–2–0 3rd W 31–13 Citrus 7 8
1994 Penn State 12–0–0 8–0–0 1st W 38–20 Rose 2 2
1995 Penn State 9–3–0 5–3–0 T–3rd W 43–14 Outback 12 13
1996 Penn State 11–2 6–2 T–3rd W 38–15 Fiesta 7 7
1997 Penn State 9–3 6–2 T–2nd L 6–21 Citrus 17 16
1998 Penn State 9–3 5–3 5th W 26–14 Outback 15 17
1999 Penn State 10–3 5–3 T–4th W 24–0 Alamo 11 11
2000 Penn State 5–7 4–4 T–6th
2001 Penn State 5–6 4–4 T–4th
2002 Penn State 9–4 5–3 4th L 9–13 Capital One 15 16
2003 Penn State 3–9 1–7 T–9th
2004 Penn State 4–7 2–6 9th
2005 Penn State 11–1 7–1 T–1st W 26–23 Orange † 3 3
2006 Penn State 9–4 5–3 T–4th W 20–10 Outback 25 24
2007 Penn State 9–4 4–4 T–5th W 24–17 Alamo 25
2008 Penn State 11–2 7–1 T–1st L 24–38 Rose † 8 8
Penn State: 383–127–3 80–48
Total: 383–127–3
National Championship Conference Title Conference Division Title
†Indicates BCS bowl game. #Rankings from final Coaches Poll of the season.
°Rankings from final AP Poll of the season.