Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Flaming Burning Stinking & Predictable Disaster that is Creighton Basketball

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • WSU has 7 wins in the past 3 years of NCAA appearances.

    Creighton's prior 7 wins in the NCAA tournament have taken them a total 41 calendar years, and 16 NCAA tournament appearances.

    No joke.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by SHOCKvalue View Post
      WSU has 7 wins in the past 3 years of NCAA appearances.

      Creighton's prior 7 wins in the NCAA tournament have taken them a total 41 calendar years, and 16 NCAA tournament appearances.

      No joke.
      So they built a power house resume in the 90's by doing what ku did.. Winning their conference over and over. I think winning whatever conference your in is good for a variety of reasons, but making deep runs in the tournament is also a important compliment to that success.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bleed yellow View Post
        So they built a power house resume in the 90's by doing what ku did.. Winning their conference over and over. I think winning whatever conference your in is good for a variety of reasons, but making deep runs in the tournament is also a important compliment to that success.
        Not even that.

        In the past 20 years Creighton has won the MVC as many times as WSU has. Four times for each.

        They only won the MVC once in the 90's to be specific.

        They're complete poseurs in the college basketball realm. A mirage that doesn't exist in reality.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by SHOCKvalue View Post
          Not even that.

          In the past 20 years Creighton has won the MVC as many times as WSU has. Four times for each.

          They only won the MVC once in the 90's to be specific.

          They're complete poseurs in the college basketball realm. A mirage that doesn't exist in reality.
          Lol.. Thanks for clearing that up.

          Comment


          • Creighton basketball may be on the downhill slope to obscurity, but they're the number 1 ranked regional (midwest) university according to US News and World Report. Interesting, there are several MVC schools in the top 20 as well. What I just don't understand is WSU is not listed. Pitt State, Emporia St., Newman and Friends but not WSU. Are we that bad in their eyes, what the hell is WSU doing wrong? What will it take for WSU, as a whole, to start getting some love from an academic reputation standpoint? That's for another topic and another day to discuss I guess.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by KC Shox View Post
              Creighton basketball may be on the downhill slope to obscurity, but they're the number 1 ranked regional (midwest) university according to US News and World Report. Interesting, there are several MVC schools in the top 20 as well. What I just don't understand is WSU is not listed. Pitt State, Emporia St., Newman and Friends but not WSU. Are we that bad in their eyes, what the hell is WSU doing wrong? What will it take for WSU, as a whole, to start getting some love from an academic reputation standpoint? That's for another topic and another day to discuss I guess.

              http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...sities-midwest

              Hogwash

              Comment


              • Originally posted by KC Shox View Post
                Creighton basketball may be on the downhill slope to obscurity, but they're the number 1 ranked regional (midwest) university according to US News and World Report. Interesting, there are several MVC schools in the top 20 as well. What I just don't understand is WSU is not listed. Pitt State, Emporia St., Newman and Friends but not WSU.

                http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...sities-midwest
                That's because your brain is so tiny, regarding WSU. We are in the National listing because we have a "full range" of undergraduate, master's and doctoral programs. We didn't crack the top 200, but that's just a matter of getting Bardo's program underway.

                Tiny, tiny, tiny.
                Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by KC Shox View Post
                  Creighton basketball may be on the downhill slope to obscurity, but they're the number 1 ranked regional (midwest) university according to US News and World Report. Interesting, there are several MVC schools in the top 20 as well. What I just don't understand is WSU is not listed. Pitt State, Emporia St., Newman and Friends but not WSU. Are we that bad in their eyes, what the hell is WSU doing wrong? What will it take for WSU, as a whole, to start getting some love from an academic reputation standpoint? That's for another topic and another day to discuss I guess.

                  http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...sities-midwest
                  Meh. That methodology is SO subjective. Graduate performance is only 7.5% of that methodology. With our Co-op and Internship program, we have to be near the top of that factor. But again, it's only 7.5% of their criteria. Which I think is dumb. Don't you go to college so you can find gainful employment once you graduate?
                  "In God we trust, all others must bring data." - W. Edwards Deming

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by KC Shox View Post
                    Creighton basketball may be on the downhill slope to obscurity, but they're the number 1 ranked regional (midwest) university according to US News and World Report. Interesting, there are several MVC schools in the top 20 as well. What I just don't understand is WSU is not listed. Pitt State, Emporia St., Newman and Friends but not WSU. Are we that bad in their eyes, what the hell is WSU doing wrong? What will it take for WSU, as a whole, to start getting some love from an academic reputation standpoint? That's for another topic and another day to discuss I guess.

                    http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...sities-midwest
                    Let me help you out here. You're new to this apparently.

                    The US News rankings are stratified, much like college sports. Creighton being #1 in the US News midwest region, at the regional level, is sort of analogous to Pitt State being the #1 ranked D2 football program in the Great Plains and/or Midwestern US. WSU on the other hand is classified at the same level as all of the large, research universities in the country. We are unranked in US News because our competition for a spot in the rankings are Michigan, Texas, UCLA, et al. We are classified as a lower level FBS football team, as it were. If WSU had academics similar to most in the Big10, we would still not cross paths with Creighton on a US News list. Parallel universes.


                    Carnegie Classifications:

                    WSU -RU/H: Research Universities (high research activity)
                    CU - Master's L: Master's Colleges and Universities (larger programs)

                    We're two rungs above CU in Carnegie Classification, in the next level up (again... D1 versus D2).

                    The Carnegie Classifications of Institutions of Higher Education® are the nation’s leading framework for categorizing diverse U.S. higher education institutions.



                    University R&D Expenditures:

                    WSU - $61.4M
                    CU - $30.0M

                    We pretty much annihilate the MVC in this category as well. I haven't looked them all up in a while, but as I recall no one even comes close to touching WSU's R&D spending, and at the end of the day, research is one of the most fundamental characteristics that academic snobs look to for a pecking order.




                    Also, if it makes you feel any better, WSU is only one of 4 schools in the state of Kansas that make the Forbes America's Top College List (Kansas has around 25 legitimate, traditional colleges and universities that could make the list). Here are some school's you might recognize that are +/- 50 spots from WSU in that list of 650:

                    St Johns
                    UAB
                    Louisville
                    Southern Miss
                    Missouri State
                    Western Kentucky
                    SIU
                    UNLV
                    Memphis

                    ...and a lot of other schools you would easily recognize. Essentially all of the MVC publics are clustered within a rankings range of about 100 spots (2 are higher than WSU, 3 are lower). The MVC privates aren't knocking anyone's socks off in the Forbes list either, including former MVC member Creighton.




                    Lastly... you are a terrifically embarrassing poster, on all of the various forums you litter with your uninformed, battered-woman-style WSU apologetics. If _kai_ could rename you #FACEPALM on all the forums you skulk around in he would make my week.
                    Last edited by SHOCKvalue; April 16, 2015, 03:22 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by KC Shox View Post
                      Creighton basketball may be on the downhill slope to obscurity, but they're the number 1 ranked regional (midwest) university according to US News and World Report. Interesting, there are several MVC schools in the top 20 as well. What I just don't understand is WSU is not listed. Pitt State, Emporia St., Newman and Friends but not WSU. Are we that bad in their eyes, what the hell is WSU doing wrong? What will it take for WSU, as a whole, to start getting some love from an academic reputation standpoint? That's for another topic and another day to discuss I guess.

                      http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...sities-midwest
                      "You Just Want to Slap The #### Outta Some People"

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Kel Varnsen View Post
                        Meh. That methodology is SO subjective. Graduate performance is only 7.5% of that methodology. With our Co-op and Internship program, we have to be near the top of that factor. But again, it's only 7.5% of their criteria. Which I think is dumb. Don't you go to college so you can find gainful employment once you graduate?
                        The vast amounts of people flushing money down the toilet to major in something useless may disagree ;)

                        Comment


                        • I believe schools pay US News and Princeton Review, etc. to be evaluated/assessed.
                          “Losers Average Losers.” ― Paul Tudor Jones

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by DUShock View Post
                            I believe schools pay US News and Princeton Review, etc. to be evaluated/assessed.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by SHOCKvalue View Post
                              Let me help you out here. You're new to this apparently.

                              The US News rankings are strati . . .

                              . . . _kai_ could rename you #FACEPALM on all the forums you skulk around in he would make my week.

                              BAM!
                              Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by DUShock View Post
                                I believe schools pay US News and Princeton Review, etc. to be evaluated/assessed.
                                No, but there are ways to game the system. Acceptance rate is one way. A lot of schools actively recruit applicants that they know they will never admit just so that they can appear more "selective."
                                The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X