Originally posted by SubGod22
View Post
I've been hearing about a possible jump for FSU/Clemson to the B12 for a while now. Both schools set up exploratory committees regarding a move last year when everything was going down. There was talk that the Syracuse/Pitt move was to either keep them or to prepare for their departure (the ESPN TV contract being renegotiated with the addition possibly bringing in enough to keep them, and making sure they have at least 12 to keep the title game either way).
Originally, I had heard that FSU was requiring Miami to be included in the move. I still think Miami would be a good addition as well, as I think the Miami area alone in recruiting is better than most entire states, and they're going to be good again in a few years. But supposedly that requirement has changed to a preference as things have moved on.
Still ... I think FSU/Clemson/Miami/Louisville would be a very strong eastern expansion to capture new media/recruiting markets and expand outwards toward WVU. And give a B12 TV network a lot more interest outside of Texas, which already has it's own network anyway.
Most of this seems to be based on the ACC's terrible TV contract, which has every ACC school locked into roughly $13-14M a year, including Tier 3 TV rights, for another 10-15 years. Meanwhile the B12, with Tier 3 rights going to a B12 network, value added for teams coming in, and a championship game not on the books yet, could reach close to $30M a year. FSU especially has been hit hard by the economic downturn in Florida. Meanwhile, most ACC schools are very rich private universities, and their interests regarding TV rights have been for maximum exposure over revenue. Thus ... completely at odds with FSU, who has plenty of exposure already, but a budget shortfall.
And to make it actually relevant to this board, it could be a surprisingly important move for FSU/Clemson in basketball, if it goes down. Currently in the ACC, Clemson and FSU rank #11 and #12 in basketball revenue, respectively. When Syracuse/Pitt join, they fall to #13 and #14. Interestingly, they would be around 4/5 in the B12. I don't know that it would guarantee anything, but theorteically both teams would be more competitive in basketball with more comparable revenue. And that's with FSU winning the ACC conference tournament while being dead last in revenue. I've got tons of respect for Coach Hamilton for what he's done with FSU's basketball program despite the lack of support from the university and fanbase.
There is also a lot of fear in the ACC that Maryland and possibly Georgia Tech are actively wanting a spot in the B1G, and Virginia Tech wants into the SEC. Neither of those would likely happen any time soon, but the ACC's future as a viable football conference is definitely in danger.
FSU/Clemson seem to be linked together on this deal either way. It's either a both go or both stay put situation.
I don't know how much faith I put in that Clemson blog, though. I don't know that things are as wrapped up as they make it sound by any means. I think going to the B12 is a possibility, and they are talking about it. But I don't think it's a done deal in the slightest.
Update: Apparently the renegotiated ACC TV deal is done. Amazingly, it barely got better. It now comes out to $16 million per team, including the conference championship game, and including Tier 3 rights. The B12 contract starts out at $20 million per team, with Tier 3 rights not included, no championship game, etc. The benefits to jumping to the B12 are still definitely there, as I'd estimate the value of the B12 contract to be $25-30 million per team with all of that. Not sure if it'll happen, but I don't think the new ACC deal does anything to alleviate the problem FSU has in the ACC. An extra $2-3 million on an already terrible contract, which now goes even longer, through 2027. Ugh.
Comment