Originally posted by shocka khan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Charlottesville riots
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by pinstripers View PostLink me
Charlottesville, Va. • A man accused of plowing a car into a crowd of activists here — killing one person and injuring 19 — long sympathized with Nazi views and had stood with a group of white supremacists hours before Saturday’s bloody crash.
Looks like he started young.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shockmonster View PostUntil both sides say there are problems that are on the right AND left, this problem will only get worse. Neither side was made up of Charlottesvillarians. The antifa is being bankrolled by George Soros and has been clashing with police, etc. for a while and the KKK has wanted to divide the country also. People like YOU and I need to call out extremists on both sides. Neither side was made up of Virginians and came to Va. from other states through social media and both side holds blame and to argue whether each side is equal is an exercise in futility and will get us nowhere.
However, for the alt-right to start to become paid professional agitators smacks of the old Black Panther Party. As a result, I do not believe there should be any sort of equivocation.
They should have never been allowed in Charlottesville and I hope they don't ever get another permit to march.
The good news is the violence over the weekend motivated Texas A&M to cancel an upcoming alt-right rally.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shocka khan View Post
Uh, no.........about 20 seconds in, "Who threw the first punch or launched the first rock was, it seemed, impossible to say"
Comment
-
Originally posted by shocka khan View PostI have to confess I have not read this entire thread, but I am really hoping you're not equivocating and excusing what happened.
Today's discussion should not be about what we dislike on the left and the various attributes we want to assign to them. Today's discussion should be what we, as a nation, are going to do about right-wing racist groups, not anyone on the left.
Something needs to be done about this. I think there are legitimate grievances, but the root of the problem was what the perpretrator did and who encouraged him to do it.
Several people on here said they didn't know who AntiFa was, so I was spelling it out for them. They were not the ones with the signs of love.Livin the dream
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockTalk View Post
Predictable that some idiots would use public sentiment on their side as free license to do stupid stuff.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shocka khan View PostThey should have never been allowed in Charlottesville and I hope they don't ever get another permit to march.
You know why, right? The ACLU knows why.
Personally, it wouldn't hurt my feelings if the KKK, Neo-Nazis, Antifa, and the Black Panthers all had a log chipper party and threw each other in, but until the very fabric of this country changes for the worst, they have a right to peacefully assemble and say whatever the heck they want, short of obvious legal limitations.
The national narrative right now about this weekend's events are chilling in the context of the above. So many people on the left throw around the fascist label at Trump, when in fact the words and wishes they utter fit the definition of the word perfectly.Last edited by SHOCKvalue; August 14, 2017, 09:34 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shocka khan View PostDon't disagree with you, what we had here was a bunch of people who were looking for trouble and found it.
However, for the alt-right to start to become paid professional agitators smacks of the old Black Panther Party. As a result, I do not believe there should be any sort of equivocation.
They should have never been allowed in Charlottesville and I hope they don't ever get another permit to march.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SHOCKvalue View PostWrong.
You know why, right? The ACLU knows why.
Personally, it wouldn't hurt my feelings if the KKK, Neo-Nazis, Antifa, and the Black Panthers all had a log chipper party and threw each other in, but until the very fabric of this country changes for the worst, they have a right to peacefully assemble and say whatever the heck they want, short of obvious legal limitations.
The national narrative right now about this weekend's events are chilling in the context of the above. So many people on the left throw around the fascist label at Trump, when in fact the words and wishes they utter fit the definition of the word perfectly.
2) I believe in freedom of speech, but disagree with anyone's right to yell 'fire' in a crowded theater just for the hell of it. Same with the people who were looking for trouble in Charlotteville this weekend on both sides.
If Canada, Europe and Australia can put sensible limits on what we might lump into the worst of "free speech", then we should be able to do it, too.
3) I don't always agree with the ACLU. I back probably 50 percent of their causes, but reject the other 50%. The ACLU does exist to defend our constitutional rights. I may only agree with about half the stuff they do, but
I believe they are a necessary evil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Play Angry View PostNot the right way to go about statue removal. Probably a crime and, if so, they should be punished.
Predictable that some idiots would use public sentiment on their side as free license to do stupid stuff.
Public sentiment or not, this cannot be tolerated. Such displays will only lead to more of the same and cause more likelihood of radical response. We cannot have groups like this throwing gas on the fire.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shocka khan View Post1) I voted for Trump. I probably would not do it now, but I did vote for him. Having said that, I am concerned about his embrace of dictators such as Dueterte in the Phillipines.
2) I believe in freedom of speech, but disagree with anyone's right to yell 'fire' in a crowded theater just for the hell of it. Same with the people who were looking for trouble in Charlotteville this weekend on both sides.
If Canada, Europe and Australia can put sensible limits on what we might lump into the worst of "free speech", then we should be able to do it, too.
3) I don't always agree with the ACLU. I back probably 50 percent of their causes, but reject the other 50%. The ACLU does exist to defend our constitutional rights. I may only agree with about half the stuff they do, but
I believe they are a necessary evil.
Comment
-
When David Duke shows up with 100 white guys marching through a Southern town at night carrying torches...that is absolutely begging for a confrontation.
That's what the Klan used to do back in the days when the march sometimes ended up with a lynching. The symbolism of carrying torches at night is one of the most provocative things that can be done in the South.
We have a right to expression, but we need to remember that the exercise of our rights can have consequences. In this case the consequences were predictable. If a peaceful protest was the intention, then this was the most poorly planned protest in history.The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aargh View PostWe have a right to expression, but we need to remember that the exercise of our rights can have consequences. In this case the consequences were predictable. If a peaceful protest was the intention, then this was the most poorly planned protest in history.
Comment
Comment