Originally posted by revenge_of_shocka_khan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Coronavirus 2019-nCoV
Collapse
X
-
Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
- a smart man
-
Originally posted by ShockerFever View PostFauci expecting 100,000 - 200,000 US deaths?
Unless things change significantly I don't see how football happens in the fall. But that might be my pessimism again.The mountains are calling, and I must go.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockerFever View Post
If he's only predicting a million infections, he's saying the death rate will be around 10%? That seems extremely high. Is he basing that high of a death rate on a strained health system? If he's expecting 100,000 deaths, I would have to think there will be way more than a million infections.The mountains are calling, and I must go.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wsushox1 View Post
There's a million people with the disease in the US right now. I'm confident in saying that. I went back and listened to the tape and he said "millions of infenctions".Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
- a smart man
Comment
-
Originally posted by SB Shock View PostKung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
-
Originally posted by wsushox1 View Post
There's a million people with the disease in the US right now. I'm confident in saying that. I went back and listened to the tape and he said "millions of infenctions".Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
I'd like to see the math that makes you confident in that. And I'm not being argumentative, I just want to see the math that got you there.
Let's say that, of the 125,000 people that have currently tested positive that 80% of those have mild-to-severe symptoms. That's roughly 100,000 people with mild to severe symptoms and 25,000 with light or asymptomatic. Let's next assume that 50% of people have mild to severe symptoms and 50% have light to no symptoms. Let's also assume, for the sake of the model that everyone with mild to severe symptoms has been tested. So that 100,000 number is every single person in the US with COVID that has mild-severe symptoms. So, in this highly simplified and assumptious model that would mean there would really be 200,000 people with COVID-19 in the US.
Next, lets assume a 5 day lag time in symptoms showing and a 4 day lag time in getting results (meaning the 200,000 number is from 9 days ago) and we assume a 15% growth factor. That yields roughly 700,000 cases. Which I still think is conservative - especially with the symptoms and testing delay.
It's a rough, back of the envelope calculation that is far from scientific. But that's how I'm getting up to my numberThe mountains are calling, and I must go.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by wsushox1 View Post
Sure, it's going to have a lot of assumptions - but every forecasting model from weather (assuming pressure is hydrostatic and simplifying PDE's), to sports (assuming a player doesn't get hurt), to the Black-Scholes model have assumptions baked in.
Let's say that, of the 125,000 people that have currently tested positive that 80% of those have mild-to-severe symptoms. That's roughly 100,000 people with mild to severe symptoms and 25,000 with light or asymptomatic. Let's next assume that 50% of people have mild to severe symptoms and 50% have light to no symptoms. Let's also assume, for the sake of the model that everyone with mild to severe symptoms has been tested. So that 100,000 number is every single person in the US with COVID that has mild-severe symptoms. So, in this highly simplified and assumptious model that would mean there would really be 200,000 people with COVID-19 in the US.
Next, lets assume a 5 day lag time in symptoms showing and a 4 day lag time in getting results (meaning the 200,000 number is from 9 days ago) and we assume a 15% growth factor. That yields roughly 700,000 cases. Which I still think is conservative - especially with the symptoms and testing delay.
It's a rough, back of the envelope calculation that is far from scientific. But that's how I'm getting up to my number
I'll have to digest what you did a bit.Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
-
Originally posted by MelvinLoudermilk View PostFrance Officially Sanctions Chloroquine After 78 Of 80 Patients Recover From COVID-19 Within Five Days
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ature=emb_logoLivin the dream
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockerFever View PostFauci expecting 100,000 - 200,000 US deaths?
Dr. Fauci Predicts Up To 200,000 Deaths From Coronavirus
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1972Shocker View Post
Here is a media report on Dr. Fauci's comments and expectations.
Dr. Fauci Predicts Up To 200,000 Deaths From Coronavirushttps://www.redstate.com/jeffc/2020/...om-coronavirus"You Just Want to Slap The #### Outta Some People"
Comment
-
China's efforts to blame coronavirus on a US army delegation to Wuhan infuriate No. 10 as Boris Johnson's advisers say Beijing's statistics on its cases could be downplayed by a factor of 40- Ministers demand review of Britain's relationship with Communist super-state
- It comes amid fury over China's misinformation blitz around Covid-19 outbreak
- PM urged to block deal with technology giant
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment