Originally posted by WuDrWu
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NCAA Round 1 - Shocks vs Wildcats
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by WuDrWu View PostI hope this program has not hit it's peak, but we need to continue to grow the fan base (and I don't have any answers how to do that) and we need to find some of the "it" that we've seemed to miss, especially this year. You know UNI has "it" when you see them (and I don't just mean Bre Payton). You just know they'll win the 24-24 point...and likewise you know we're not. That's got to change if we're going to move forward.
I also agree that this team was missing that special "it". Hard to define it but you know it when you see it. Hopefully, we find that special "it" again going forward.
One thing that is true from my perpective though is that our Women's Volleyball program is easy to fall in love with if you give it a shot. Great coaches, wonderful student-athletes and a very entertaining product.
Comment
-
While I certainly want to grow the fan base, I can't buy the idea that consistent top 10 attendance is great support on a relative rather than absolute basis. If year-in year-out being in the top 10 is not great support on an absolute basis, I would be interested to know what is. Is there some financial support that WSU is lacking compared to other elite teams?"Cotton scared me - I left him alone." - B4MSU (Bear Nation poster) in reference to heckling players
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuDrWu View PostIt's now time to turn the page. We say goodbye, however sad, to the Mary Elizabeth Hooper era and usher in a new team. Will we move forward? I don't know. I hear people say the talent level keeps improving but I am nowhere near skilled enough to offer an opinion on that, but it's hard for me to believe we'll be better without MEH even if I think Feekin is uber talented (which I do).
That said I have faith that Lambo and team will figure it out and put another solid team on the floor next year. After all I am a fan and that means hope springs eternal. Wait till next year. Enjoy the ride.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Mad Hatter View PostWhile I certainly want to grow the fan base, I can't buy the idea that consistent top 10 attendance is great support on a relative rather than absolute basis. If year-in year-out being in the top 10 is not great support on an absolute basis, I would be interested to know what is.
Maximizing out your capacity and potential regardless of what others are doing is abosolute performance and we are a long way from that.
The fact that you (and no doubt the great majority of Shocker fans) are accepting our strong relative performance as satisfactory is exactly why I don't think we will grow our fan base much more than where it is.Last edited by 1972Shocker; December 2, 2011, 11:51 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1972Shocker View PostSee Hawaii. That is what I consider great support.
While I'd love to have Hawaii level attendance, so would Penn State, Texas, and Nebraska. None are up to their standard. By being consistently in the top 10, however, we are all in the same category of having high levels of support in absolute terms."Cotton scared me - I left him alone." - B4MSU (Bear Nation poster) in reference to heckling players
Comment
-
If your standard is how are we doing compared to others than you have established by definition a relative standard.
If you believe that 2,500 fans per match is outstanding attendance regardless of what others are doing then fine. I think we have the ability to do substantially better than that. However, I don't think we will do better than that. After all, we are in the Top 10 in attendance so we must be doing as well as we can.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Mad Hatter View PostSo great support in absolute terms means having the best support in the nation? Isn't that a bit like saying that LSU doesn't have great football support because they average almost 20,000 less fans than Michigan?
While I'd love to have Hawaii level attendance, so would Penn State, Texas, and Nebraska. None are up to their standard. By being consistently in the top 10, however, we are all in the same category of having high levels of support in absolute terms.
Comment
-
Nebraska 2-3 K-State!!
The Wildcats, 15-11 in the fifth. They move on to the Honolulu Regional.
A further note: of the sixteen first-round matches between non-nationally seeded teams (i.e., the 2/3 seeds in the sub-regionals), fourteen of them required a minimum of four sets. Of course, ours with K-State was one of the two that did not. Disappointing.
Comment
-
Last year, when the #5 seeded UNI team lost in 5 sets at home to a 20-10 Missouri team, everyone (or at least most of the folks at volleytalk) ranted about how the Panthers were grossly overrated and their seeding was "a joke".
This year, #2 seeded Nebraska lost in 5 sets at home to a 20-10 Kansas State team. Does that mean that Nebraska is even more grossly overrated this year than UNI was decried to be last year?
Comment
-
Originally posted by JayJ79 View PostLast year, when the #5 seeded UNI team lost in 5 sets at home to a 20-10 Missouri team, everyone (or at least most of the folks at volleytalk) ranted about how the Panthers were grossly overrated and their seeding was "a joke".
This year, #2 seeded Nebraska lost in 5 sets at home to a 20-10 Kansas State team. Does that mean that Nebraska is even more grossly overrated this year than UNI was decried to be last year?
And UNI plays in a very poor volleyball conference.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BCSCat View PostNo, the Nubbies are just as good as ever this year. The 'Cats have peaked at the right time after finishing 4th in one of the top conferences in volleyball. K-State has more victories at NU than any other team.
And UNI plays in a very poor volleyball conference.
Comment
Comment