Dead Period

[jdmee]

From reading this it looks like the 16th is the last day of the dead period.

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/ncaa?ContentID=25072

[Shox21]

From reading this it looks like the 16th is the last day of the dead period.

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/ncaa?ContentID=25072

Couldin't get your link to open, but here is where I got my dates:

http://collegebasketball.about.com/od/recruiting/a/signing-dates.htm

[pinstripers]

I usually get my dates at the "Dewdrop", and normally not till after midnight...............

[Shox21]

From reading this it looks like the 16th is the last day of the dead period.

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/ncaa?ContentID=25072

Finallly got your link to open. I believe if they tried just a little harder they could make it totally incomprehensible. But the way I read it I believe you are correct. If I am understanding this right, the next contact period would be between April 17 and May 20. But who knows if I have my head screwed on right -- you practically have to draw a diagram to figure it out.

[rZ]

We have a world-class Exercise Science program at WSU!

Im not saying you dont get a solid education in that program. But world-class it is not.

[wu_shizzle]

This dead period is "killing" me.

Maybe we should do a poll on who we'll sign, or whether we'll sign somebody we're not aware of.

[RampageWSU]

We have a world-class Exercise Science program at WSU!

Im not saying you dont get a solid education in that program. But world-class it is not.

Nah...nothing big. Just 2 ACSM fellows... I tell ya, the program is one of the better in the country. It's not Texas, or Pittsburgh, but it's definitely one of the top 25 or so.

[rZ]

We have a world-class Exercise Science program at WSU!

Im not saying you dont get a solid education in that program. But world-class it is not.

Nah...nothing big. Just 2 ACSM fellows... I tell ya, the program is one of the better in the country. It's not Texas, or Pittsburgh, but it's definitely one of the top 25 or so.

A program that does not have enough faculty to teach the necessary number of courses, has outdated laboratory facilities, and has no PhD program is not in the top 25. Further more, the required courses to earn this degree do not provide the breadth of knowledge necessary when educating scientists.

That being said, one particular faculty member has applied for and received major $$$ to spend on new lab equipment. The program has potential, if it can separate itself from the College of Education.

Only 1 ACSM fellow in the dept. of human performance studies. Only 3 faculty total, and ruth is a joke so she doesn't count.

Edit: Found this for you as well, granted it's from 2006 however these reviews and program rankings are done on a 5 year basis.

T1. Penn St. and UCONN
T3. Arizona St., U. of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, U. of Maryland
6. UMASS-Amherst
7. Indiana U.
T8. Oregon St., Teachers College-Columbia U., U. of South Carolina
T11. Texas A&M, U. of Minnesota
13. UT-Austin
14. U. of Georgia-Athens
T15. U. of Houston, U. of Illinois-Chicago, U. of Wisconsin-Madison
T18. Michigan St., U. of Michigan
20. Iowa St.
21. Ohio St.
T22. Ohio St., West Virginia
T24. Purdue, UNC-Greensboro
T26. Oklahoma, Utah
28. Auburn
29. Texas Womans
30. Mississippi
31. Florida St.
32. North Dakota St.

Criteria based on faculty indices include Productivity (research publications, books and book chapters, research presentations) Funding (federal, internal, and external) and Visibility (number of faculty on editorial boards and number of professional association fellows)

Criteria based on student indices include Graduate Assistant Support, Student Quality (GRE scores), Employment (postdocs, and number of graduates employed in the field) and Admissions (selectivity and yield)

As a side note, there are some very prominent universities that chose not to participate in this latest ranking review

[tropicalshox]

This dead period is "killing" me.

Maybe we should do a poll on who we'll sign, or whether we'll sign somebody we're not aware of.

I would have to vote for players not yet on the summary. We don't appear to be close to any of them.

[wu_shizzle]

This dead period is "killing" me.

Maybe we should do a poll on who we'll sign, or whether we'll sign somebody we're not aware of.

I would have to vote for players not yet on the summary. We don't appear to be close to any of them.

I'd take Torye Pelham for a high energy guy off the bench. We could play offense/defense at the 3 with He and Johnny Coy. But again I have no idea what the interest level is there.

[tropicalshox]

He is visiting other schools. Doesn't appear like we are a match.

[tropicalshox]

Quintrell Thomas, mentioned earlier in this thread will be transfering to UNLV.