Re: status of the athletic department
I'll repsond.
a)Not too troubling, although I do think a little "fresh paint" on all the events wouldn't be a bad thing. BUT before anyone goes off half-cocked, first look at the bottom line. If the money taken in at these events has consistently increased over the last few years (and I don't know for sure) then it's hard to blame them, at all.
b)Maybe. Everyone has their own beliefs on where and when things should happen. I think this is a minor issue that does need to be addressed, inter-departmentally.
c)I have no idea of all the details, but if they are laid out as you say, this is disconcerting to say the least. If I were you, or your friend, I would send an email to Darron Boatright tonight, detailing the events, and ask for an immediate response. I promise you he'll get one.
d)Again, I have no idea of the details, but I would call Darron first thing in the morning. And if you already contacted him (and I would be STUNNED that he didn't get back to you) then call Ruth Matz in the AD's department and let her know and I FLIPPING GUARANTEE you it will get in Eric's hands.
I don't think things are perfect, they rarely are. However good things are being done. The problem that we (those of us on SN) is that we each have our priorities and expect them to be at or near the top of the WSU-ICAA priority list. And there is a decent chance their ideas of importance and ours don't often collide, as frustrating as that may be to you and me.
I also think there are underlying.....issues is too strong a word.....dynamics perhaps?....underlying dynamics that may have ultimate factoring on the end product that we might see as a shortcoming of one person or department, when in fact the blame belongs elsewhere.
Originally posted by InWuWeTrust
a)Not too troubling, although I do think a little "fresh paint" on all the events wouldn't be a bad thing. BUT before anyone goes off half-cocked, first look at the bottom line. If the money taken in at these events has consistently increased over the last few years (and I don't know for sure) then it's hard to blame them, at all.
b)Maybe. Everyone has their own beliefs on where and when things should happen. I think this is a minor issue that does need to be addressed, inter-departmentally.
c)I have no idea of all the details, but if they are laid out as you say, this is disconcerting to say the least. If I were you, or your friend, I would send an email to Darron Boatright tonight, detailing the events, and ask for an immediate response. I promise you he'll get one.
d)Again, I have no idea of the details, but I would call Darron first thing in the morning. And if you already contacted him (and I would be STUNNED that he didn't get back to you) then call Ruth Matz in the AD's department and let her know and I FLIPPING GUARANTEE you it will get in Eric's hands.
I don't think things are perfect, they rarely are. However good things are being done. The problem that we (those of us on SN) is that we each have our priorities and expect them to be at or near the top of the WSU-ICAA priority list. And there is a decent chance their ideas of importance and ours don't often collide, as frustrating as that may be to you and me.
I also think there are underlying.....issues is too strong a word.....dynamics perhaps?....underlying dynamics that may have ultimate factoring on the end product that we might see as a shortcoming of one person or department, when in fact the blame belongs elsewhere.
Comment