Why???

[shocksrox]

yeah, i'm completely ignorant -

Perhaps the best and most truthful post of the day.

good to see your usual thought out contributions to a thread

[SubGod22]

yeah, i'm completely ignorant -

Perhaps the best and most truthful post of the day.

:good:

[ShockCity]

nope

it's in reaction to people fawning all over him simply for the fact that he's 7 foot tall and can (amazingly at that heighth) dunk a lot

i try to look at the product and performance that he (stutz) is putting on the court in a shocker uniform (without the gold and black shaded sunglasses that most who can't find a single thing negative to say about stutz tend to wear), rather then the glitz & glamour that goes into high school recruiting rankings that so many hold on to for far to long when a player is obviously not as good as advertised

OMG, you must not be a good shocker fan! A good Shocker fan wouldn't dare say a negative thing about a player or coach. How dare you!

:roll:

[ShockCity]

yeah, i'm completely ignorant -

Perhaps the best and most truthful post of the day.

Haaaaa! So true!

[swish1]

More Why's to ponder...

"They run their offense," Kyles said. "Most people just go through the motions. They actually sprint through everything."

Wow what a novel approach to the game. :sarcasm:

this is exactly why all the people saying kyles should be starting need to shut up. the only reason kyles should start is to maybe send a message to murry. for one game only.

also i would like to see more PT for kenny.

[RoyalShock]

yeah, i'm completely ignorant -

Perhaps the best and most truthful post of the day.

good to see your usual thought out contributions to a thread

Are you the same person posting as rockjshox on the Eagle? The one who had most of his posts removed for being abusive and was criticizing WSU for scheduling the Utah St. game? (I nearly laughed out loud at that moron.)

I wonder because you're looking forward to a "good 7-footer" coming in next year. You clearly haven't been paying attention to the EO thread. If you're disappointed in Stutz, I can't wait until you're complaining that we're playing 4 on 5 on offense.

[SB Shock]

yeah, i'm completely ignorant -

Perhaps the best and most truthful post of the day.

good to see your usual thought out contributions to a thread

got to clean the pop off my monitor ..

Sometimes the truth hurts, especially when it comes from the great WuDrWu. :whistle:

[im4wsu]

nope

it's in reaction to people fawning all over him simply for the fact that he's 7 foot tall and can (amazingly at that heighth) dunk a lot

i try to look at the product and performance that he (stutz) is putting on the court in a shocker uniform (without the gold and black shaded sunglasses that most who can't find a single thing negative to say about stutz tend to wear), rather then the glitz & glamour that goes into high school recruiting rankings that so many hold on to for far to long when a player is obviously not as good as advertised

How about a few facts?

Mr. Stutz is WSU's leading rebounder per minute played garnering .271 rebounds per minute (aside from Felter who is .308 in only 13 minutes); Blair is next at .231.

Mr. Stutz is WSU's leading scorer per minute played at .463 pts per minute; Durley is .462 and Hannah is .408.

Mr. Stutz grabs a larger percentage of available offensive rebounds at 13.6% than any other Shocker (except Felter at 15.4% in 13 minutes); nest ebst offensive rebounder is Blair at 11.0% of the offensive rebounds available to him.

Forpercentage of defensive rebounds available to grab, Mr Stutz is third at 17.7%, trailing Blair at 18.4% and Durley at 17.8%.

Statistically , I find it very difficult to believe in your comments, let alone justify them.

[shocksrox]

yeah, i'm completely ignorant -

Perhaps the best and most truthful post of the day.

good to see your usual thought out contributions to a thread

Are you the same person posting as rockjshox on the Eagle? The one who had most of his posts removed for being abusive and was criticizing WSU for scheduling the Utah St. game? (I nearly laughed out loud at that moron.)

I wonder because you're looking forward to a "good 7-footer" coming in next year. You clearly haven't been paying attention to the EO thread. If you're disappointed in Stutz, I can't wait until you're complaining that we're playing 4 on 5 on offense.

nope, not me - i don't know of any post on any message board that i've had removed, sorry

[shocksrox]

nope

it's in reaction to people fawning all over him simply for the fact that he's 7 foot tall and can (amazingly at that heighth) dunk a lot

i try to look at the product and performance that he (stutz) is putting on the court in a shocker uniform (without the gold and black shaded sunglasses that most who can't find a single thing negative to say about stutz tend to wear), rather then the glitz & glamour that goes into high school recruiting rankings that so many hold on to for far to long when a player is obviously not as good as advertised

How about a few facts?

Mr. Stutz is WSU's leading rebounder per minute played garnering .271 rebounds per minute (aside from Felter who is .308 in only 13 minutes); Blair is next at .231.

Mr. Stutz is WSU's leading scorer per minute played at .463 pts per minute; Durley is .462 and Hannah is .408.

Mr. Stutz grabs a larger percentage of available offensive rebounds at 13.6% than any other Shocker (except Felter at 15.4% in 13 minutes); nest ebst offensive rebounder is Blair at 11.0% of the offensive rebounds available to him.

Forpercentage of defensive rebounds available to grab, Mr Stutz is third at 17.7%, trailing Blair at 18.4% and Durley at 17.8%.

Statistically , I find it very difficult to believe in your comments, let alone justify them.

what?!?! the guy who's taller then anyone else on the team can rebound good? no way man!

and i would like to see what percentage of his points come off dunks - i'm sure you'd be much less impressed after you saw that stat

now if he was just smart enough to not foul every 30 seconds or in shape enough that he could play more then 5 minutes at a time, those per minute averages might actually mean something too

[TheUglyTruth]

nope

it's in reaction to people fawning all over him simply for the fact that he's 7 foot tall and can (amazingly at that heighth) dunk a lot

i try to look at the product and performance that he (stutz) is putting on the court in a shocker uniform (without the gold and black shaded sunglasses that most who can't find a single thing negative to say about stutz tend to wear), rather then the glitz & glamour that goes into high school recruiting rankings that so many hold on to for far to long when a player is obviously not as good as advertised

How about a few facts?

Mr. Stutz is WSU's leading rebounder per minute played garnering .271 rebounds per minute (aside from Felter who is .308 in only 13 minutes); Blair is next at .231.

Mr. Stutz is WSU's leading scorer per minute played at .463 pts per minute; Durley is .462 and Hannah is .408.

Mr. Stutz grabs a larger percentage of available offensive rebounds at 13.6% than any other Shocker (except Felter at 15.4% in 13 minutes); nest ebst offensive rebounder is Blair at 11.0% of the offensive rebounds available to him.

Forpercentage of defensive rebounds available to grab, Mr Stutz is third at 17.7%, trailing Blair at 18.4% and Durley at 17.8%.

Statistically , I find it very difficult to believe in your comments, let alone justify them.

:good: :clap: :good: :clap:

[ShockCity]

nope

it's in reaction to people fawning all over him simply for the fact that he's 7 foot tall and can (amazingly at that heighth) dunk a lot

i try to look at the product and performance that he (stutz) is putting on the court in a shocker uniform (without the gold and black shaded sunglasses that most who can't find a single thing negative to say about stutz tend to wear), rather then the glitz & glamour that goes into high school recruiting rankings that so many hold on to for far to long when a player is obviously not as good as advertised

How about a few facts?

Mr. Stutz is WSU's leading rebounder per minute played garnering .271 rebounds per minute (aside from Felter who is .308 in only 13 minutes); Blair is next at .231.

Mr. Stutz is WSU's leading scorer per minute played at .463 pts per minute; Durley is .462 and Hannah is .408.

Mr. Stutz grabs a larger percentage of available offensive rebounds at 13.6% than any other Shocker (except Felter at 15.4% in 13 minutes); nest ebst offensive rebounder is Blair at 11.0% of the offensive rebounds available to him.

Forpercentage of defensive rebounds available to grab, Mr Stutz is third at 17.7%, trailing Blair at 18.4% and Durley at 17.8%.

Statistically , I find it very difficult to believe in your comments, let alone justify them.

Shocksrox...you've officially been served!

[Aargh]

Shocksrox...you've officially been served!

And aced.

On match point.

I'm one of those who leans toward "if you can't say something good, sometimes it's best not to say anything at all", but I'm pretty happy to have a So post coming off the bench who's # 5 on the team in scoring at 7.0 ppg, and # 4 on the team in rebounding at 4.1 per game.

That's quality depth and that's all Stutz is expected to be or supposed to be this year.

The ESPN announcers were commenting on what a monster he's likely to be by his Sr year.

If Stutz was having the kind of year that some fans think he should be having, he'd be a first-round NBA pick after this year.

[im4wsu]

nope

it's in reaction to people fawning all over him simply for the fact that he's 7 foot tall and can (amazingly at that heighth) dunk a lot

i try to look at the product and performance that he (stutz) is putting on the court in a shocker uniform (without the gold and black shaded sunglasses that most who can't find a single thing negative to say about stutz tend to wear), rather then the glitz & glamour that goes into high school recruiting rankings that so many hold on to for far to long when a player is obviously not as good as advertised

How about a few facts?

Mr. Stutz is WSU's leading rebounder per minute played garnering .271 rebounds per minute (aside from Felter who is .308 in only 13 minutes); Blair is next at .231.

Mr. Stutz is WSU's leading scorer per minute played at .463 pts per minute; Durley is .462 and Hannah is .408.

Mr. Stutz grabs a larger percentage of available offensive rebounds at 13.6% than any other Shocker (except Felter at 15.4% in 13 minutes); nest ebst offensive rebounder is Blair at 11.0% of the offensive rebounds available to him.

Forpercentage of defensive rebounds available to grab, Mr Stutz is third at 17.7%, trailing Blair at 18.4% and Durley at 17.8%.

Statistically , I find it very difficult to believe in your comments, let alone justify them.

what?!?! the guy who's taller then anyone else on the team can rebound good? no way man!

and i would like to see what percentage of his points come off dunks - i'm sure you'd be much less impressed after you saw that stat

now if he was just smart enough to not foul every 30 seconds or in shape enough that he could play more then 5 minutes at a time, those per minute averages might actually mean something too

How short does one have to be before a rebound is considered a good thing?

How far away from the basket does one have to be before the two points count?

Shall we take away all dunks from the Shockers and reduce our record to 14-15? Makes sense to me!

[shocksrox]

The ESPN announcers were commenting on what a monster he's likely to be by his Sr year.

well, we should put him in the shocker hall of fame already - i mean, the ESPN announcers that saw him for the first time we sucking him off and all