Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pitt fans give us some respect.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by shocker22
    I think that Pitt will be too physical for us. It will be good experience, but the east coat style of play will be a little too much to handle, especially for GS and the freshman.
    I dunno about that one.

    Just ask Seton Hall, Syracuse, and Providence twice on how they used their size against us. Hell, LSU for that matter when Big Baby was playing for them.

    They should be favored and will more than likely win, we are still young and will need to shoot lights out to win but we won't be no easy win for these guys.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by KC Shox
      Originally posted by shocker22
      I think that Pitt will be too physical for us. It will be good experience, but the east coat style of play will be a little too much to handle, especially for GS and the freshman.
      I dunno about that one.

      Just ask Seton Hall, Syracuse, and Providence twice on how they used their size against us. Hell, LSU for that matter when Big Baby was playing for them.

      They should be favored and will more than likely win, we are still young and will need to shoot lights out to win but we won't be no easy win for these guys.
      Wasn't Big Baby already gone when we played them?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by verbeak
        Originally posted by KC Shox
        Originally posted by shocker22
        I think that Pitt will be too physical for us. It will be good experience, but the east coat style of play will be a little too much to handle, especially for GS and the freshman.
        I dunno about that one.

        Just ask Seton Hall, Syracuse, and Providence twice on how they used their size against us. Hell, LSU for that matter when Big Baby was playing for them.

        They should be favored and will more than likely win, we are still young and will need to shoot lights out to win but we won't be no easy win for these guys.

        Wasn't Big Baby already gone when we played them?
        Not when we played them the first time at their place.
        "He called me around noon and was thrilled," Brandt said. "He said he was going to be a Shocker forever." -- RIP Guy, you WILL indeed be a Shocker forever!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by verbeak
          Wasn't Big Baby already gone when we played them?
          No! That was the Phil-Thomasson-Is-The-Second-Coming-of-Kevin-McHale game. Phil had his way with him all night. Got a two-handed jam right over Davis.

          :clap: :wsu_posters: :yahoo: :clap:

          Comment


          • #35
            Big Baby was pretty good for only being 6'6".

            I don't think that Pitt will manhandle us. Stutz will have the hardest time, but I think JT will be okay. Actually Stutz may not play that much in the Pitt game, especially after his pitiful performance tonight. Most of our problems in the past from playing BCS teams was the fact that we were just a little undersized, but we are not anymore.

            Coach needs to sit Stutz down, and watch every game that Cole Aldrich has played in, and just say, "Watch and learn".

            It just struck me that Toure' wears Jordan's number 23.

            Kyles athleticism shows up more and more each game. How about that dunk? Pretty, wasn't it?

            Blair had a much better 2nd half.

            The jury is still out on Manigault.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by shocker22
              Originally posted by shockmonster
              Shocker 22 - Which freshman are you talking about?
              If Williams and Manigault play. The big East is just a different type of basketball.
              You know Kenny grew up on the east coast, right? He's more than familiar with that kind of play.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Snapshot9
                Big Baby was pretty good for only being 6'6".

                I don't think that Pitt will manhandle us. Stutz will have the hardest time, but I think JT will be okay. Actually Stutz may not play that much in the Pitt game, especially after his pitiful performance tonight. Most of our problems in the past from playing BCS teams was the fact that we were just a little undersized, but we are not anymore.

                Coach needs to sit Stutz down, and watch every game that Cole Aldrich has played in, and just say, "Watch and learn".

                It just struck me that Toure' wears Jordan's number 23.

                Kyles athleticism shows up more and more each game. How about that dunk? Pretty, wasn't it?

                Blair had a much better 2nd half.

                The jury is still out on Manigault.
                I see a lot of potential w/ Manigault. He did just play his 2nd collegiate game. The speed w/ Manigault, Williams, Kyles & even Murry will make us quite happy. Factor in Ellis & the length on defense was evident last night.
                Phi Alpha

                Comment


                • #38
                  Wonder what the line will be? I'm guessing Pitt by 1 or 2..no more than 4...Don't see the oddsmakers making us a favorite

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Snapshot9
                    Big Baby was pretty good for only being 6'6".

                    I don't think that Pitt will manhandle us. Stutz will have the hardest time, but I think JT will be okay. Actually Stutz may not play that much in the Pitt game, especially after his pitiful performance tonight. Most of our problems in the past from playing BCS teams was the fact that we were just a little undersized, but we are not anymore.

                    Coach needs to sit Stutz down, and watch every game that Cole Aldrich has played in, and just say, "Watch and learn".

                    It just struck me that Toure' wears Jordan's number 23.

                    Kyles athleticism shows up more and more each game. How about that dunk? Pretty, wasn't it?

                    Blair had a much better 2nd half.

                    The jury is still out on Manigault.

                    Sub has been correct about Kyles from the day we first started recruited him. I think he'll be a real piece of work before he leaves here.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by NYshocker
                      Sub has been correct about Kyles from the day we first started recruited him. I think he'll be a real piece of work before he leaves here.
                      When David puts it all together, he'll be just as good as Eldridge and Stinnett, I have no doubt.
                      "Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but by what you should accomplish with your ability."
                      -John Wooden

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by wu_shizzle
                        Originally posted by NYshocker
                        Sub has been correct about Kyles from the day we first started recruited him. I think he'll be a real piece of work before he leaves here.
                        When David puts it all together, he'll be just as good as Eldridge and Stinnett, I have no doubt.
                        I dunno, I think when David really gets going, he'll be able to kick the ball much higher in the student section than Stinnett ever did!

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Shoxfan11
                          Originally posted by wu_shizzle
                          Originally posted by NYshocker
                          Sub has been correct about Kyles from the day we first started recruited him. I think he'll be a real piece of work before he leaves here.
                          When David puts it all together, he'll be just as good as Eldridge and Stinnett, I have no doubt.
                          I dunno, I think when David really gets going, he'll be able to kick the ball much higher in the student section than Stinnett ever did!
                          :good:

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Sorry about that "recruited" typo. (my wife will have a cow)

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by wu_shizzle
                              Originally posted by NYshocker
                              Sub has been correct about Kyles from the day we first started recruited him. I think he'll be a real piece of work before he leaves here.
                              When David puts it all together, he'll be just as good as Eldridge and Stinnett, I have no doubt.
                              I was just thinking the same thing about Murry, although he is a little bit different type of player thanKyles, OE, and p'a s. Check out his line (through two games of week competition):

                              15.5 ppg, 7 assists, 4 boards, 2 steals, and 3 to's per game. Those are POY numbers if this team wins the MVC!
                              Livin the dream

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                David is pretty good right now.

                                He is a pretty damn good shooter. I really like his 3 ball shot. It always seems like it is on line.

                                He makes a lot of unglamourous, but effective plays with his athleticism.
                                "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it is about the future."

                                --Niels Bohr







                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X