I'm concerned about our Athletic Director. This is an opportunity to give him honest feedback on how you think he is doing - whether a great job or poor job with feedback. Why give him the grade you are giving? We all want WSU athletics to be the best it can be, and a great deal of that success starts with our AD. This poll expires on September 15th, so grade early.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Report Card for Sexton.
Collapse
X
-
I'm giving him a "D".
Positives:
-- Great guy with charisma
-- Seemingly good at raising money
-- Deep WSU and Wichita roots
-- Family tree of WSU football legend
-- Great contacts in the Wichita area
-- Good experience as an assistant AD which is a solid platform
-- Seems to ensure fiduciary responsibility with the Athletic Department
-- Seems to ensure the programs abide by NCAA rules/regulations
Challenges
-- Has not adjusted to new role of being a leader instead of simply raising money and being the assistant AD
-- Communication seems lacking at times
-- Lost a successful tennis coach to OSU
-- Has not communicated his vision for WSU athletics
-- Does not seem to grab the coaches by the horns when needed
-- Needs to work with the media better
-- Doesn't know when to "jump in" or "take a step back" (i.e jumped in with his opinion on the shot clock fiasco when he didn't have all of the facts, but has taken a step back and been rather lethargic in being proactive with the Adams issue and Coy issue).
Overall, I'll give him a D with hope that he takes a more leadership role in growing our athletic programs, positively promoting the programs, and communicating better with meda and coaches (and players and their parents).
-
Originally posted by Awesome Sauce MaloneHow is this an opportunity to give him honest feedback.
If anything its an opportunity to give him anonymous feedback.
But in reality how the heck is he going to get this? Does he have "Check Shockernet thread for poll results 2pm - 230pm" on his outlook calendar.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VeritasOriginally posted by Awesome Sauce MaloneHow is this an opportunity to give him honest feedback.
If anything its an opportunity to give him anonymous feedback.
But in reality how the heck is he going to get this? Does he have "Check Shockernet thread for poll results 2pm - 230pm" on his outlook calendar.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Awesome Sauce MaloneOriginally posted by VeritasOriginally posted by Awesome Sauce MaloneHow is this an opportunity to give him honest feedback.
If anything its an opportunity to give him anonymous feedback.
But in reality how the heck is he going to get this? Does he have "Check Shockernet thread for poll results 2pm - 230pm" on his outlook calendar.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Awesome Sauce MaloneHow is this an opportunity to give him honest feedback.
If anything its an opportunity to give him anonymous feedback.
But in reality how the heck is he going to get this? Does he have "Check Shockernet thread for poll results 2pm - 230pm" on his outlook calendar.
If this wasn't that important to you, then you shouldn't have clicked on the topic.
As for the grade, Sexton gets a D from me. Too much BS going on around here.Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
- a smart man
Comment
-
Originally posted by VeritasI'm giving him a "D".
Positives:
-- Great guy with charisma
-- Seemingly good at raising money
-- Deep WSU and Wichita roots
-- Family tree of WSU football legend
-- Great contacts in the Wichita area
-- Good experience as an assistant AD which is a solid platform
-- Seems to ensure fiduciary responsibility with the Athletic Department
-- Seems to ensure the programs abide by NCAA rules/regulations
Challenges
-- Has not adjusted to new role of being a leader instead of simply raising money and being the assistant AD
-- Communication seems lacking at times
-- Lost a successful tennis coach to OSU
-- Has not communicated his vision for WSU athletics
-- Does not seem to grab the coaches by the horns when needed
-- Needs to work with the media better
-- Doesn't know when to "jump in" or "take a step back" (i.e jumped in with his opinion on the shot clock fiasco when he didn't have all of the facts, but has taken a step back and been rather lethargic in being proactive with the Adams issue and Coy issue).
Overall, I'll give him a D with hope that he takes a more leadership role in growing our athletic programs, positively promoting the programs, and communicating better with meda and coaches (and players and their parents).
Exactly what vision did Schaus show for WSU athletics?
And exactly what could he have done about the shot clock fiasco? Stop his feet and throw a fit?
I give him a B. Losing a tennis coach to OSU is the way of the world.
Comment
-
First of all, what could Eric have done in StL?
We got screwed, but it was over. Nothing else could be done. I was there throwing a fit, but it did not do any good.
When you have 2 head coaches with egos, the Coy thing was going to happen. Did you want Eric to tell Gene and Gregg to play NICE? the same result was going to happen.
Could the WBB issues be handled better? Maybe. Who cares about the tennis team.
For the record Eric was not an assistant AD.
I give Veritas or whatever your name is an I for being an idiot. You can give your opinion, but you can't back it up with any facts or alternatives.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ABCOriginally posted by VeritasI'm giving him a "D".
Positives:
-- Great guy with charisma
-- Seemingly good at raising money
-- Deep WSU and Wichita roots
-- Family tree of WSU football legend
-- Great contacts in the Wichita area
-- Good experience as an assistant AD which is a solid platform
-- Seems to ensure fiduciary responsibility with the Athletic Department
-- Seems to ensure the programs abide by NCAA rules/regulations
Challenges
-- Has not adjusted to new role of being a leader instead of simply raising money and being the assistant AD
-- Communication seems lacking at times
-- Lost a successful tennis coach to OSU
-- Has not communicated his vision for WSU athletics
-- Does not seem to grab the coaches by the horns when needed
-- Needs to work with the media better
-- Doesn't know when to "jump in" or "take a step back" (i.e jumped in with his opinion on the shot clock fiasco when he didn't have all of the facts, but has taken a step back and been rather lethargic in being proactive with the Adams issue and Coy issue).
Overall, I'll give him a D with hope that he takes a more leadership role in growing our athletic programs, positively promoting the programs, and communicating better with meda and coaches (and players and their parents).
Exactly what vision did Schaus show for WSU athletics?
And exactly what could he have done about the shot clock fiasco? Stop his feet and throw a fit?
I give him a B. Losing a tennis coach to OSU is the way of the world.
:good: :good: :D
"You Just Want to Slap The #### Outta Some People"
Comment
-
Originally posted by jcdshockerFirst of all, what could Eric have done in StL?
We got screwed, but it was over. Nothing else could be done. I was there throwing a fit, but it did not do any good.
When you have 2 head coaches with egos, the Coy thing was going to happen. Did you want Eric to tell Gene and Gregg to play NICE? the same result was going to happen.
Frankly if Marshall/Stephenson were having issues with what was going on, they should be able to go to the AD to get the issues worked out. But at least from the Coy side neither coach would talk to each other - that is a sign of dysfunctional organization. Of course we don't know what the WSU side of the story is because the AD decided to just ignore it and hope it go away.
Frankly if there were truly promises made by the two coaches, then they should have honored them and the AD should be the one to make sure it happens.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jcdshockerFirst of all, what could Eric have done in StL?
We got screwed, but it was over. Nothing else could be done. I was there throwing a fit, but it did not do any good.
When you have 2 head coaches with egos, the Coy thing was going to happen. Did you want Eric to tell Gene and Gregg to play NICE? the same result was going to happen.
Could the WBB issues be handled better? Maybe. Who cares about the tennis team.
For the record Eric was not an assistant AD.
I give Veritas or whatever your name is an I for being an idiot. You can give your opinion, but you can't back it up with any facts or alternatives.
The Coy "thing" did not have to happen, and certainly did not have to happen in the manner in which it occurred. All of that "thing" should have and easily could have been negated by communication by those involved and that includes ADES leading the way.
The WBB "issues" were known beforehand by ADES (reported by The Eagle), and yet due to apparent lack of discussions with the women players, the majority of them vent to the media instead of using the proper outlet (probably because it wasn't there).
Additionally, we should do what we can to hang onto our good coaches - no matter the sport. Losing any top ranked MoVal coach has the potential to hurt our overall athletic program.
I want ADES to be successful as it bodes well for the overall health of our athletic program. I simply feel he has a very large learning curve and is off to a very rocky start.
However, as you so eloquently put it, it is indeed simply my opinion and I very well could be wrong. For the sake of our programs, I hope I am wrong.
Comment
Comment