Indeed! JT was out of position constantly on defense and stood around and watched guys go for rebounds several times. No excuse for that, I'm sorry, but it's true. I thought he had been making some progress, but he definitely regressed tonight.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
J.T.Durley
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by t7017sAnd failed to spend any time in the paint at all on offense tonight... Some things just never change do they.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockCityIndeed! JT was out of position constantly on defense and stood around and watched guys go for rebounds several times. No excuse for that, I'm sorry, but it's true. I thought he had been making some progress, but he definitely regressed tonight.
These players had a good to average game:
Code:Hannah 0.499 Murray 0.423 Hawkins 0.319 Chamberlain 0.280 Griskenas 0.256
Code:Stutz 0.224 Durley 0.175 Ellis 0.147 Clemente 0.128 Hatch 0.022
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1979ShockerOriginally posted by ShockCityIndeed! JT was out of position constantly on defense and stood around and watched guys go for rebounds several times. No excuse for that, I'm sorry, but it's true. I thought he had been making some progress, but he definitely regressed tonight.
These players had a good to average game:
Code:Hannah 0.499 Murray 0.423 Hawkins 0.319 Chamberlain 0.280 Griskenas 0.256
Code:Stutz 0.224 Durley 0.175 Ellis 0.147 Clemente 0.128 Hatch 0.022
Comment
-
I wouldn't say Chamberlain and Griskenas had a good to average game, remember the 20's are equivalent to a 'D', which is poor in my books.
An average game is .350 performance. And you are not going to beat Creighton with an average performance as a team.
Comment
-
79 You're formula doesn't measure the times that Durley snoozes (such as the time that he went for a rebound without screening Walker and Walker rebounded the ball and had an open lane to the basket for a dunk). If Durley had put a body on Walker, the lane to the basket wouldn't have been open.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1979ShockerOriginally posted by ShockCityIndeed! JT was out of position constantly on defense and stood around and watched guys go for rebounds several times. No excuse for that, I'm sorry, but it's true. I thought he had been making some progress, but he definitely regressed tonight.
These players had a good to average game:
Code:Hannah 0.499 Murray 0.423 Hawkins 0.319 Chamberlain 0.280 Griskenas 0.256
Code:Stutz 0.224 Durley 0.175 Ellis 0.147 Clemente 0.128 Hatch 0.022
Good Game
Hannah 17 pts (+6.6 contribution) - the spark plug of this offense
Murry 16 pts (+4.9 contribution) - performance should help his confidence
Average Games
Hawkin 9 pts (-2.7 contribution) - been solid over 7 games
Below Average Game
Stutz 4 pts (-1.5 contribution) - has to get tougher and meaner
Chamberlain 5 pts (-2.7 contribution) - up and down
Non-Contributors (dead-weight)
Durley 2 pts (-6.9 contribution) - setback, seemed to be making progress
Clemente 1 pt (-2.1 contribution) - his worst game
Ellis 0 pts (-3.9 contribution) - he's struggle in 4 games
Hatch 0 pts (-3.2 contribution) - negative contributor in 7 of 9 games
Griskenas 2 pts (-1.9 contribution)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snapshot9I wouldn't say Chamberlain and Griskenas had a good to average game, remember the 20's are equivalent to a 'D', which is poor in my books.
An average game is .350 performance. And you are not going to beat Creighton with an average performance as a team.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockCityClemente had one of his worst nights, and was multiple times better than JT, because of his effort.
Code:FG 3FG FT REB PF TP A TO BLK S Clemente 0-4 0-0 1-2 4 3 1 0 0 0 1 Durley 1-6 0-1 0-0 8 2 2 0 3 1 0
Comment
Comment