Looking at this year and next year:
Post - Stutz/Durley
PF - Clemente/Ellis/Blair
SF - Hawkins/Ellis/Kyles (?)
Guards - Hannah/Chamberlain/Murry/Kyles/Hatch/Manigault
Sorry, but Durley is a post player. A bit undersized, but he had about as good a Fr year as Randall Falker had. There aren't any minutes available for Durley at PF in the next 2 years. There will be minutes available at the 5.
I think Durley can learn some D and I'm claiming to be a realist. If Durley can play some D, he and Stutz are serviceable at post this year and could be nasty next year. Then there's the possibility that Orukpe comes in the year after that. How in the world do you recruit a post player into that situation?
I think a 6'5" - 6'7" SF is the most logical recruit for 2009. That position is the first long-term spot that needs a player. If we need to go small and quick, we've got that covered for years. If we need to go taller there, that's the recruit we need and could get.
Post - Stutz/Durley
PF - Clemente/Ellis/Blair
SF - Hawkins/Ellis/Kyles (?)
Guards - Hannah/Chamberlain/Murry/Kyles/Hatch/Manigault
Sorry, but Durley is a post player. A bit undersized, but he had about as good a Fr year as Randall Falker had. There aren't any minutes available for Durley at PF in the next 2 years. There will be minutes available at the 5.
I think Durley can learn some D and I'm claiming to be a realist. If Durley can play some D, he and Stutz are serviceable at post this year and could be nasty next year. Then there's the possibility that Orukpe comes in the year after that. How in the world do you recruit a post player into that situation?
I think a 6'5" - 6'7" SF is the most logical recruit for 2009. That position is the first long-term spot that needs a player. If we need to go small and quick, we've got that covered for years. If we need to go taller there, that's the recruit we need and could get.
Comment