Proposed rule changes for 2017-18

[RoyalShock]

[Shoxcity]

Ha. Marshall gets 10 more feet to scream at officials.

[1972Shocker]

Ha. Marshall gets 10 more feet to scream at officials.

I think most of the shouting 3G does is at his players although he takes his shot at officials when needed.

[Cdizzle]

Ha. Marshall gets 10 more feet to scream at officials.

This rule has the chance to help other teams more than WSU. There is a reason Marshall doesn't call timeouts. His players know what they need to be doing.

[RoyalShock]

I like the shotclock reset to 20 rule.
Not wild about yet another late-game situation where officials can stop play and go to the monitors.
The legal screen clarification with regards to feet placement is fine.
The leg-straddle interpretations should be interesting.

I'm mostly indifferent toward the rest.

[ShockerPhi]

I'd like to see them not call a shot clock violation if the defensive team immediately gets possession of the ball (like rebounding an airball or recoving a loose ball after the buzzer sounds). Just help improve the flow of the game.

[ShockerEngr]

I like the minimum .3 secs of the clock after touching. Should help speed up end of game situations.

[WheatShock]

I don't like the 1st rule. I prefer teams that are able to operate more independently of the coach at the far end of the floor to have the advantage.

I think the rest of the proposed changes are fine although allowing refs to use replay to determine block or charge at the end of a game sets an interesting precedent.

[Shoxcity]

I don't like the 1st rule. I prefer teams that are able to operate more independently of the coach at the far end of the floor to have the advantage.

I think the rest of the proposed changes are fine although allowing refs to use replay to determine block or charge at the end of a game sets an interesting precedent.

Going to add five extra minutes to the game.

[Rosewood]

I'm ok with this

[1979Shocker]

I'd like to see them not call a shot clock violation if the defensive team immediately gets possession of the ball (like rebounding an airball or recoving a loose ball after the buzzer sounds). Just help improve the flow of the game.

I think in a case like this, there should be no stoppage of play as long as the defense obtained possession.

[ShockerPrez]

Ha. Marshall gets 10 more feet to scream at officials.

Bruce Webber can dance and shimmy all over now.

[mini-shock]

Are offensive flops a foul?

I could go for that. This would eliminate the annoying head spasm flops on drives.

[Shoxcity]

Refs should only get a certain amount of fouls a game. See national championship for example.

[WuShock16]

Refs should only get a certain amount of fouls a game. See national championship for example.

You serious, Clark?

I can already think of several awful unintended consequences from this idea.