Originally posted by WuShock Reaper
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2017-18 National Rankings
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by WuShock Reaper View PostLooking at the AP Top 25 schedules for the next two weeks, there won't be a lot of opportunities for the Shockers to move. Not as many Top 25 Match ups and not as many games on the road for Top 25 teams,You do not have permission to view this gallery.
This gallery has 1 photos.Shocker Alumni
Shocker Club Soccer alumni
Jayhawk fan but the Shockers come first
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostI don’t think the Shox schedule is comparable to North Carolina’s last year. Better than WSU’s last season, sure, but still not elite.
24-6 would probably land the Shox around 10-12 in the polls.
Comment
-
What part of March polls, March SOS, and a 24-6 record did you not understand?
-
Caveat anyone?
Where'd I reference March?Last edited by ShockingButTrue; January 24, 2018, 05:15 PM.
-
-
"Power Rankings: Top Four Hold Firm While Three New Squads Join" - Sports illustrated
By MOLLY GEARY
January 24, 2018
"7. OKLAHOMA (15–4)
10. CINCINNATI (17–2)
Last Week (13): beat East Carolina
Next Week: vs. Temple, at Memphis
Of the top 10 teams people are most skeptical about, the Bearcats are probably at the top of the list. There’s reason for it—of the top 50 teams on kenpom.com, Cincy has the weakest strength of schedule at a rank of 257, and it lost both games against its toughest opponents so far (Xavier and Florida). Despite that though, the Bearcats and their stingy defense sit at No. 6 overall on kenpom, 10 points higher than they ever got last year amidst a 22–2 start. Cincinnati has the feeling of a team that will be very polarizing among bracket pickers in March, even if it were to sweep its games against Wichita State. For now though, it’s in the driver’s seat in the AAC after the Shockers dropped back-to-back games.
14. WICHITA STATE (15–4)
Last Week (5): lost to SMU, lost to Houston
Next Week: vs. UCF, vs. Tulsa
The Shockers got their “welcome to the AAC” moment—twice—in the last week in dropping games to SMU and Houston. Both of those teams are in the American’s upper tier, but they were the kind of games that seemed more likely to serve as résumé builders for Wichita State rather than losses. It’s easy to pinpoint the Shockers’ biggest issue right now, and that’s their defense. Despite ranking sixth in the nation in minutes continuity from last season and being one of its most experienced teams, the Shockers’ D has dropped from the No. 13 ranking in adjusted efficiency on kenpom.com to No. 59. The Mustangs, which have a top-30 offense, recently scorched them for 1.38 PPP, after scoring only 0.82 against AAC leader Cincinnati. We know Wichita State has the pieces to defend much better, and maybe it’s still partly a matter of not having Markis McDuffie operating at his 2016–17 level. But for now, the Shockers have lost their edge...."
- Likes 1
Comment
-
"Week 12 College Basketball Power Rankings" - Fansided
by Matt Kobold
Posted: 01/24/18, 10:30am CST
https://fantasycpr.com/2018/01/24/we...ower-rankings/
"14.) Wichita State Shockers 15-4 (5-2) PR: 7
It was shocking to see the Shockers drop two conference games this week. They lost to SMU at home before losing by 14 at Houston. They allowed SMU to shoot a blistering 64% from the field and 50% from deep. The latter game saw Wichita State shoot 33% from the field, 20% from deep, and commit 18 turnovers. They continue to share the ball though, averaging 18.8 assists per game (5th nationally). Wichita State will look to get back on track with two conference home games this week.
11.) Oklahoma Sooners 14-4 (4-3) PR: 8..."
Comment
-
Those #14s seem reasonable at this point; the Shocks are capable of playing better and being better, especially as McDuffie regains his form, which eventually he will. But until it happens, there's no good reason to rank them any higher than that, and if anything there still may be a little benefit of the doubt in placing them that high rather than down a couple of notches as in the polls.
Comment
-
2 more Top 25 losses last night to unranked teams, #20 Florida falls to South Carolina and #23 Nevada fallls to Wyoming
a lot of good games tonight and more chances for upsets
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockerFever View Post
My eyeballs don’t lie.
As Play Angry stated, they started extremely low and are stil victim to preseason stuff.
UT Arlington. Currently 13-9, 4-5, 6th place in the Sunbelt. Peaked at KenPom 72, now 119.
Yes, your eyeballs lie. Search your feelings. I can feel the conflict within you. Let go of your hate (for beautiful wonderful formulas).
Comment
-
Wow that was pinching your sphincter for a good 2 months.
I hope you can sleep better tonight now.
Btw, it’s easy to call out people when one never makes a prediction or observation like ever.Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
- a smart man
Comment
-
You were not proven right. UTA played like a Top 25 team in November. Go ahead and try to prove that wrong. All of your geeked out numbers from January won’t help you win this one.
I’ll go ahead and refrain from patting myself of the back by going back and looking back on all the things that I’ve called correctly.
Chin up. You got your whole life ahead of you now that you’ve got rid of all that weight you were carrying around with you the past 2 months.
-
Yeah, Nov 11 & 25 never happened.
-
Originally posted by Zubcut View Post
I understand perfectly how poll mechanics work. I know exactly why ASU is only ranked #5. But there is now enough sample size that some voters need to believe their eyes and vote based on results and not preconceived ideas from the preseason. One voter still has ASU ranked 18th, Kansas 6th and Xavier 10th. You can call that poll mechanics if you want. I call it stupid.
Actually, Xavier at 10 seems about right, but you can't have them six spots above an undefeated team with 4 top 50 KenPom wins that absolutely destroyed them on a neutral court. Now, Kansas at 6?!?!? Let's talk "poll mechanics".
I think it is wise to use some preseason expectations when generating rankings in December. No, there isn’t enough sample size at that time to rely solely on games played to date.
Comment
-
Eh, I have a difference in perspective -- I prefer the rankings to be used as a snapshot of quality and resume. You're looking at it as a projection. It's wise to use preseason expectations in December if your goal is to make the December poll as close as possible to what the March poll would look like. It's not wise if you want the December poll to look as close as possible to what teams have done by December. I see no need to reward teams like Kansas for playing cupcake schedules in the noncon before they've done anything worth rewarding.
I know Kansas is good, and I know they'll be a top team by March. But if they want to schedule the way they do, they deserve the slight punishment of lower AP rankings, IMO. I have KenPom to tell me who is actually the best(-ish) -- I don't need the polls for that.
-
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostWith a win Sunday, WSU gains a solid number of points, but despite tons of top 25 losses all around, stays at #17.
#NotAPredictionShocker Nation, NYC
Comment
Comment