Conner Frankamp

[jdshock]

If we're down 3 with 10 seconds on the clock, who do you want taking the three? Assume we can set up our offense and we could have CF, LS, AR, MM, or whoever you want, on the floor.

Does Shamet's athleticism and height give him the nod over CF?

[Stickboy46]

If we're down 3 with 10 seconds on the clock, who do you want taking the three? Assume we can set up our offense and we could have CF, LS, AR, MM, or whoever you want, on the floor.

Does Shamet's athleticism and height give him the nod over CF?

You give it to whoever they decide to play off of. Throw RN as the 5th. You literally can't leave any of those 5 open at the 3 pt line.

[lemuel777]

If we're down 3 with 10 seconds on the clock, who do you want taking the three? Assume we can set up our offense and we could have CF, LS, AR, MM, or whoever you want, on the floor.

Does Shamet's athleticism and height give him the nod over CF?

You may need to start a new thread with that question.

[jdshock]

You give it to whoever they decide to play off of. Throw RN as the 5th. You literally can't leave any of those 5 open at the 3 pt line.

I'm not sure I've paid attention well enough to know if Shaq or Kelly are setting significantly better screens than Nurger. I get the sense Nurger is probably setting good enough screens, but the potential for him to drain a 3 after the screen makes him the best 5 in this scenario.

[Cdizzle]

If we're down 3 with 10 seconds on the clock, who do you want taking the three? Assume we can set up our offense and we could have CF, LS, AR, MM, or whoever you want, on the floor.

Does Shamet's athleticism and height give him the nod over CF?

I'd vote Shamet. Mostly because he's also a 40%+ 3pt shooter, but you could decoy the crap out of it with Frankamp.

[Stickboy46]

I'm not sure I've paid attention well enough to know if Shaq or Kelly are setting significantly better screens than Nurger. I get the sense Nurger is probably setting good enough screens, but the potential for him to drain a 3 after the screen makes him the best 5 in this scenario.

Without a doubt, Shaq is the best screen setter. He's just a big man to get around. He's also the most likely to get an incorrectly called foul IMO. I'd still go with RN.

[Aargh]

If we're down 3 with 10 seconds on the clock, who do you want taking the three? Assume we can set up our offense and we could have CF, LS, AR, MM, or whoever you want, on the floor.

Does Shamet's athleticism and height give him the nod over CF?

That's going to \depend on how the opponent is defending and what trends they've shown during the game. With Nurger, McDuffie, Shamet, and Frankmap on the floor, there are a lot of decoy opportunities.

If it's a 2-point deficit instead of 3, then it's Frankamp. McDuffie and Shamet can get up pretty high if there's an offensive rebound opportunity.

[Stickboy46]

That's going to \depend on how the opponent is defending and what trends they've shown during the game. With Nurger, McDuffie, Shamet, and Frankmap on the floor, there are a lot of decoy opportunities.

If it's a 2-point deficit instead of 3, then it's Frankamp. McDuffie and Shamet can get up pretty high if there's an offensive rebound opportunity.

If its a 2 point game, you probably want CF, LS, MM, RK, SM on the floor. CF taking a shot with LS, MM, RK, and SM crashing the boards.

[WuDrWu]

You guys all think we're going to be behind at some point the rest of the way?


Interesting......

[Cdizzle]

You guys all think we're going to be behind at some point the rest of the way?


Interesting......

And by rest of the way, you mean?

[pie n eye]

You guys all think we're going to be behind at some point the rest of the way?


Interesting......

Ha, very good. I was just thinking about posting, "if we continue in this trajectory it could be a while before we have to worry about that scenario."

[1972Shocker]

Had his 12 minutes in the first half been as productive as his second half, he'd have had 26.7 points on 20 shots, 5 rebounds and 5 assists in 30 minutes.

I question that he would have had 26.7 points.

[Stickboy46]

I question that he would have had 26.7 points.

I could see a scenario where Elgin creates an emergency rule change effective at half-time that Conner's 3's are only worth 2.7 points. Gotta make it fair and all.

[im4wsu]

I question that he would have had 26.7 points.

Isn't a rim-out worth 0.7?

[Cdizzle]

Isn't a rim-out worth 0.7?

If they are, MVC fans would think they won 80% of their games against WSU the last 5 years.