Hard to complain about the top 10 players; still, any subjective list of this type, which is so driven by memory and eye tests with no serious metrics to help out, lends itself to quibbles about specific positions.
Personally, I liked the top four but would have rearranged the next four, putting VanVleet ahead of Armstrong for his impact on winning, and maybe Baker ahead of Levingston for the same reason even though Cliff was a far higher NBA draft choice than Ron can plausibly hope to be. There may also have been a little bit of an agenda at play; Lutz has made it clear for years that he believes Armstrong is officially underappreciated (a rare case in which I agree with him -- I'm delighted to see Warren the Player way up there even though I think he may have been a shade too high).
Nice series, and now it's time for Fred and Ron to issue their call for a recount with some big postseason work.
Personally, I liked the top four but would have rearranged the next four, putting VanVleet ahead of Armstrong for his impact on winning, and maybe Baker ahead of Levingston for the same reason even though Cliff was a far higher NBA draft choice than Ron can plausibly hope to be. There may also have been a little bit of an agenda at play; Lutz has made it clear for years that he believes Armstrong is officially underappreciated (a rare case in which I agree with him -- I'm delighted to see Warren the Player way up there even though I think he may have been a shade too high).
Nice series, and now it's time for Fred and Ron to issue their call for a recount with some big postseason work.
Comment