Originally posted by Stickboy46
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WSU Versus UNLV Predictions and Pregame Discussions
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 1972Shocker View PostRK, is 1 for 7 from behind the arc this year and about half of those (it seems like) were air balls.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jdshock View PostThis probably isn't the thread for this discussion, but I really enjoy this argument. I think training is so much better now that the best players in the 50's and 60's couldn't compete with the best players today if they time travelled to today's game. If you could bring back Wilt, or Bill Russell, or whoever and have them grow up with today's training, though, they'd still be some of the best of all time. Even aside from training, the game is just so much more complicated today than it used to be. Players today have to know so many offensive and defensive schemes, and coaches have more knowledge than ever before.
To relate this back to the topic at hand, I believe the best college teams today are better than the best college teams around 1990-1992."Prediction is very difficult, especially if it is about the future."
--Niels Bohr
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1972Shocker View PostRK, is 1 for 7 from behind the arc this year and about half of those (it seems like) were air balls. McDuffie is 6-14 this year. I am not necessarily recommending that lineup but you were talking about how to space the floor on offense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave Stalwart View PostAfter tonight, Rauno will be 4 for 10 on the season. *Crosses fingers*
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuShock16 View PostI seem to remember from the last Creighton game in Wichita that there were consequences for those who picked Creighton to win that game after the Shockers were indeed victorious. Calling into the coaches show and 'fessing up to 3G was one of those consequences.
I'm not saying. I'm just saying.
I took my medicine and Shocked Coach Marshall and Mike."Prediction is very difficult, especially if it is about the future."
--Niels Bohr
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1972Shocker View Post4 for 7 tonight, huh? Now you are an optimist. Not sure I particularly like the dynamic of being in a position where Rauno is able to take 7 treys. That's getting into Ron Baker territory on attempts."I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
---------------------------------------
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
"We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".
A physician called into a radio show and said:
"That's the definition of a stool sample."
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1972Shocker View Post4 for 7 tonight, huh? Now you are an optimist. Not sure I particularly like the dynamic of being in a position where Rauno is able to take 7 treys. That's getting into Ron Baker territory on attempts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dan View PostI went to look at the UNLV Board to see what they're saying about the game tonight. A whopping 13 posts on the matchup. I guess I overestimated their fanbase. Not to mention the thread title misspelled Wichita.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dan View PostI went to look at the UNLV Board to see what they're saying about the game tonight. A whopping 13 posts on the matchup. I guess I overestimated their fanbase. Not to mention the thread title misspelled Wichita.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dan View PostI went to look at the UNLV Board to see what they're saying about the game tonight. A whopping 13 posts on the matchup. I guess I overestimated their fanbase. Not to mention the thread title misspelled Wichita.
Comment
Comment